|
 |
|
CASE REPORT |
|
|
|
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 26
| Issue : 5 | Page : 91-95 |
| |
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of buccal mucosa: Innocuous but invasive
Vaishali Narayen, N D V N Shyam, Renukuntla Shravani, Mudududla Priyanka
Department of Oral Pathology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| Date of Submission | 12-Nov-2020 |
| Date of Decision | 07-Jul-2021 |
| Date of Acceptance | 04-Aug-2021 |
| Date of Web Publication | 28-Feb-2022 |
Correspondence Address:
Vaishali Narayen
Room No: 331, Department of Oral Pathology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Afzalgunj, Hyderabad - 500 012, Telangana
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_460_20
 Abstract | | |
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) was first described in the 19th century which is usually seen in association with lung cancer and is very rare in the oral cavity. Here, we report one such case in a 39-year-old male patient who presented with swelling on the left middle third of the face for 6 months. This is the 12th SNEC of oral cavity case so far reported in the English literature and the third case to be present on buccal mucosa. It presented as a nodular swelling over the buccal mucosa and was clinically diagnosed as a traumatic fibroma. The histopathological sections showed diffuse sheets of round cells with granular chromatin. Immunohistochemical findings helped us arrive at a final diagnosis. SNECs are highly proliferative tumors characterized by early and widespread metastases through the vascular channels. Hence, the diagnosis and appropriate management of these lesions is important to decrease the morbidity and mortality rate.
Keywords: Lung carcinoma, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, traumatic fibroma
How to cite this article:
Narayen V, Shyam N D, Shravani R, Priyanka M. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of buccal mucosa: Innocuous but invasive. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2022;26:91-5 |
How to cite this URL:
Narayen V, Shyam N D, Shravani R, Priyanka M. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of buccal mucosa: Innocuous but invasive. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 24];26:91-5. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2022/26/5/91/338768 |
| Introduction | |  |
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) is a poorly differentiated and a high-grade tumor that occurs most commonly in lungs.[1] It is an aggressive malignant neoplasm with regional and distant metastasis. Extrapulmonary SNECs account for 2.5%–5% of all SNECs among which head-and-neck SNECs contribute to 10%–15% and they tend to arise in different structures of head-and-neck region.[2] Among these, larynx is the most common site, followed by the salivary glands and sinonasal region.[3]
To the best of our knowledge, 12 cases of primary SNECs occurring in the oral cavity have been reported in the English literature.[1] They have predominantly occurred on the tongue, with two cases reporting on buccal mucosa. Here, we report a rare case of SNEC on the left buccal mucosa.
| Case Report | | |
A 39-year-old male came to the Outpatient Department of Government Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, with a chief complaint of swelling on the left middle third of the face for 6 months. The patient developed swelling on the left cheek region which was initially small in size with a gradual increase to the present size and was not associated with pain.
On extraoral examination, a diffuse swelling was noticed on the left middle third of the face measuring approximately 5 cm × 4 cm in size leading to mild facial asymmetry. Superoinferiorly, the swelling extended from the infraorbital rim to the line joining ala of nose and ear lobule. Anteroposteriorly, it extended 2 cm from ala of the nose to the tragus of the ear. A single submandibular lymph node was palpable which was mobile, tender and soft to firm in consistency. The swelling was firm and nontender on palpation with no local rise in temperature.
Intraorally, a solitary swelling was seen on the left buccal mucosa measuring approximately 3 cm × 3 cm, slightly erythematous in color with white pebbled surface. Anteroposteriorly, it extended on the buccal mucosa from the distal aspect of 24–28 region [Figure 1]. On palpation, the swelling was nontender and firm in consistency. It was clinically diagnosed as traumatic fibroma, and thus, no imaging techniques were advised. An incisional biopsy was performed and sent for histological evaluation. | Figure 1: Intraoral picture showing swelling on the left buccal mucosa with white and pebbled surface
Click here to view |
On macroscopic examination, a single soft-tissue bit was received, which was creamish brown in color measuring about 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm and firm in consistency [Figure 2]. The tissue was sent for routine histological processing. | Figure 2: Macroscopic picture showing single creamish brown soft-tissue bit measuring about 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm
Click here to view |
Microscopically, the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections showed a highly cellular connective tissue stroma with nests and sheets of small round-to-ovoid cells with ill-defined borders, scanty cytoplasm and finely granular nuclear chromatin [Figure 3]. Surrounding these cells, numerous foci of spindle-shaped cells with pleomorphic, hyperchromatic nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli were evident [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]. The tumor cells showed increased mitoses (2–3 per five high-power field) intermixed with foci of necrosis and hemorrhage. The connective tissue surrounding the cells was dense with collagen fiber bundles. | Figure 3: Photomicrograph showing sheets and nests of round cells with surrounding capsular tissue (H&E, ×4)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 4: Photomicrograph showing small cells with ill-defined borders surrounded by oval-to-spindle-shaped cells with pleomorphism (H&E, ×10)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 5: Photomicrograph showing nests of round-to-oval small cells with hyperchromatic nucleus and pleomorphism (H&E, ×40)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 6: Photomicrograph showing cells with ill-defined borders, scanty cytoplasm and finely granular nuclear chromatin (H&E, ×40)
Click here to view |
With the above H&E findings, a diagnosis of poorly differentiated round cell tumor was made. The histological differential diagnoses included were lymphoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma.
Immunohistochemical analyses were performed on a panel of markers to arrive at a final diagnosis which included CD45, CD56, CK20, CK8/18 and S-100. The analysis revealed strong and moderate positive expression to CK 8/18, CD56, respectively, and negative to CK20, CD45 and S-100 [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]. With these histopathological findings and immunohistochemical analyses, a definite and final diagnosis of SNEC of the buccal mucosa was made. | Figure 7: Photomicrograph showing tumor cells with uniform and strong membranous positivity to CK8/18 (immunohistochemistry ×40)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 8: Photomicrograph showing tumor cells with uniform and moderate positivity to CD56 ((immunohistochemistry ×10)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 9: Photomicrograph showing tumor cells with negative expression to CK20 ((immunohistochemistry ×10)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 10: Photomicrograph showing tumor cells with negative expression to CD45 ((immunohistochemistry ×10)
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
NEC is a poorly differentiated and aggressive carcinoma commonly occurring in the lungs with rare occurrence in nonpulmonary (head and neck, mucosal and salivary gland) areas. It has well-defined clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics and are characterized by the presence of secretory granules and peptide substances.[4] The World Health Organization (2017) has classified NECs into three categories: well, moderate and poorly differentiated which, in turn, is divided into two subtypes - small cell and large cell types,[5] whereas the primary NEC occurring in the oral cavity has been classified into typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, large cell and small cell NEC. The SNEC is known by other terminologies such as “small-cell carcinoma,” “oat cell carcinoma” and “anaplastic small cell carcinoma.”[6]
Oral SNECs occur in the age group of 40–83 years (average of 67.5 years). In the present case, the patient was a 39-year-old which is similar to the case reported by Esmati et al.[4] Both pulmonary NECs and SNECs of oral cavity occur commonly in males (81.8%) than in females which is comparable to our current case.[1]
The most common risk factors for SNEC include smoking and alcohol consumption as per the cases reported till date.[7] On the contrary, the patient in the present case had no history of tobacco smoking but consume alcohol occasionally.
The sites commonly involved in the oral cavity are tongue (64%), gingiva (9%) and buccal mucosa (18%).[1] In the present case, the lesion has occurred on the left buccal mucosa which is one of the rare sites of involvement reported so far.
The histopathological features of our case are similar to those of classic small-cell carcinoma, consisting of tightly packed round-to-ovoid cells, small in size with scanty eosinophilic cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei with fine granular chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli.[8] The tumor cells were arranged in nests and sheets with frequently occurring mitotic figures and areas of necrosis. On considering these findings, a provisional histological diagnosis of poorly differentiated round cell tumor was given.
Immunodiagnosis was done using a panel of markers where the tumor cells showed moderate positive expression to CD56 which is a neural cell adhesion molecule and an integral membrane glycoprotein indicating the neuroendocrine differentiation of tumor cells. Furthermore, the cells showed strong positive expression to CK8/18 which is a low molecular weight cytokeratin ascertaining the epithelial origin of the tumor cells.
As the lesion was negative for CD45 (common leukocyte antigen), the diagnosis of lymphoma was ruled out. Even S-100 immunomarker was negative excluding melanoma from the diagnosis. Negative expression of tumor cells to CK20 which is a major cellular protein and specific for Merkel cells helped us to rule out Merkel cell carcinoma.
Since SNECs are highly aggressive in nature with distant metastasis, they are more effectively treated by a multimodality approach.[9] In localized SNEC of the oral cavity, surgical excision with postoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy is usually considered as an effective treatment, whereas chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic high-grade head-and-neck NECs as found by Barker et al.[10],[11] In our case, the patient was referred to a cancer institute for further treatment which included surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The patient was under regular follow-up for 1 year every 2 months and no recurrences were observed. The prognosis of SNECs of head and neck is unpredictable. Majority of cases showed a very poor prognosis with high metastatic potential.[12] The study conducted by Baugh et al. has shown a median survival rate of 19 months in patients who received chemotherapy whereas 11 months in those who did not receive any chemotherapy.[13] The site of primary tumor may also be prognostically important as reported by Hatoum et al. They found that SNECs arising from salivary glands have a better prognosis when compared to other areas in the head-and-neck region.[14]
| Conclusion | | |
Primary SNEC of the oral cavity is very rare with only limited number of cases published so far. The present case reported on buccal mucosa is the third such case to be published in the English literature. The overall prognosis remains poor owing to rarity of these tumors in the head-and-neck region, with lower survival rates and no definite treatment approach till date. Hence, more such cases need to be reviewed for understanding the biologic behavior and also for proper treatment planning.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initial s will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Zhou Y, Zhou HC, Peng H, Zhang ZH. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the right posterior tongue. World J Meta Anal 2020;8:285-91.  |
| 2. | Galanis E, Frytak S, Lloyd RV. Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma. Cancer 1997;79:1729-36. |
| 3. | Wakasaki T, Yasumatsu R, Masuda M, Matsuo M, Tamae A, Kubo K, et al. Small cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2019;128:1006-12. |
| 4. | Esmati E, Babaei M, Matini A, Ashtiani MS, Hamed EA, Nosrati H, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the tongue. J Cancer Res Ther 2015;11:659. |
| 5. | Gale N, Poljak M, Zidar N. Update from the 4 th Edition of the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumours: What is new in the 2017 WHO blue book for tumours of the Hypopharynx, Larynx, Trachea and Parapharyngeal space. Head Neck Pathol 2017;11:23-32. |
| 6. | Mahomed F. Neuroendocrine cells and associated malignancies of the oral mucosa: A review. J Oral Pathol Med 2010;39:121-7. |
| 7. | Zeng M, Yang SD, Zhang JL, Chen XM. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the oral cavity: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2015;10:887-90. |
| 8. | Terada T. Small cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (cheek mucosa): A case report with an immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013;6:780-7. |
| 9. | Pointer KB, Ko HC, Brower JV, Witek ME, Kimple RJ, Lloyd RV, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the head and neck: An analysis of the National Cancer Database. Oral Oncol 2017;69:92-8. |
| 10. | Lee DH, Kim JH, Yoon TM, Lee JK, Lim SC. Metastatic small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the submandibular gland from the lung: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e19018. |
| 11. | Barker JL Jr., Glisson BS, Garden AS, El-Naggar AK, Morrison WH, Ang KK, et al. Management of nonsinonasal neuroendocrine carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer 2003;98:2322-8. |
| 12. | Renner G. Small cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A review. Semin Oncol 2007;34:3-14. |
| 13. | Baugh R, Gregory T, Wolf MD, Charles J, Krause MD, Theodore F, et al. Small cell carcinoma of larynx: Results of therapy. Laryngoscope 1986;96:1283-90. |
| 14. | Hatoum GF, Patton B, Takita C, Abdel-Wahab M, LaFave K, Weed D, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the head and neck: The university of Miami experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;74:477-81. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
A primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNC) of the oral cavity (cheek mucosa): Description of a case report |
|
| Raffaele Longo, Sebastien Colin, Camille Streiff, Claire Gamelon Benichou, Chloé Wendel, Marco Campitiello, Francesca Plastino, Claire Bastien, Julie Egea | | Oral Oncology. 2023; 137: 106295 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
