ONLINE ONLY ARTICLES - FORENSIC CORNER
|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 450
Evaluation of canine sexual dimorphism in deciduous and permanent dentition
Pramod Ingaleshwar1, Vina Vaswani2, Satish Subrao Bhosale3, V Deepak4, Pramod Redder5, T Smitha6
1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, P.M.N.M Dental College and Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, RR Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
4 Department of Dentistry, ESIC Medical College, PGIMSR and Model Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
5 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
6 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, VS Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
|Date of Submission||22-May-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||17-Aug-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||14-Dec-2018|
Satish Subrao Bhosale
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, RR Dental College and Hospital, Umarda, Udaipur - 313 015, Rajasthan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Teeth are an excellent material in living and nonliving populations for anthropological, genetic, odontologic and forensic investigations. Among the various calcified structures in the human body, teeth have gained lot of popularity in estimating the sex of an individual as they are highly resistant to destruction and decomposition. The present study aims to assess the importance of canines in sexual dimorphism in both primary and permanent dentition as well as to describe the dimensional characteristics of canines among the population of Bagalkot district of Karnataka, India.
Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty participants belonging to Bagalkot district of Karnataka population, 100 adults (50 males and 50 females) in the age group of 17–30 years and 50 children (25 boys and 25 girls) in the age group of 3–6 years were included in the study. Impressions were made using alginate and study models were prepared using dental stone. Clinical crown height (CCH), maximum mesiodistal diameter (MMD) and maximum buccolingual width (MBL) of maxillary and mandibular canines of both dentitions were measured using digital vernier caliper.
Results: In deciduous dentition, significant differences were noted between maxillary and mandibular deciduous canines in male and female children using three dimensions, except mandibular canine, i.e., CCH did not show a significant difference. In permanent dentition, CCH and MMD showed significant differences except mandibular canines not showing significant differences in MBL (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Thus, canines can act as a valuable tool in gender determination as there is significant sexual dimorphism in maxillary and mandibular deciduous and permanent dentition.
Keywords: Canines, mesiodistal diameter, sexual dimorphism
|How to cite this article:|
Ingaleshwar P, Vaswani V, Bhosale SS, Deepak V, Redder P, Smitha T. Evaluation of canine sexual dimorphism in deciduous and permanent dentition. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2018;22:450
|How to cite this URL:|
Ingaleshwar P, Vaswani V, Bhosale SS, Deepak V, Redder P, Smitha T. Evaluation of canine sexual dimorphism in deciduous and permanent dentition. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 28];22:450. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2018/22/3/450/247355
| Introduction|| |
Identification of living as well as the dead using skeletal remains and dentition is of paramount importance in routine forensic practice. The only method that can give the most accurate result is DNA technique, but it cannot be employed in all cases. Teeth being hardest and chemically the most stable tissue in the body are selectively preserved and fossilized, thereby providing the best record for evolutionary change and forensic investigation. Their durability in the phase of fire and bacterial decomposition makes them invaluable for identification of age, sex and race based on odontometric parameters.
“Sexual dimorphism” refers to those differences in size, stature and appearance between male and female that can be applied to dental identification because no two mouths are alike.
Sex determination using dental features is mainly based on the comparison of tooth dimensions in males and females. Canines are least frequently extracted teeth being less affected by periodontal disease. Mesiodistal diameter of mandibular and maxillary canines provides evidence of sex determination due to dimorphism. According to Suazo et al (2008), teeth are known to have sexual dimorphism. Tooth crowns being larger in males than in females may be because of longer period of amelogenesis for both temporary and permanent dentitions in males.
The present study shows that there are significant differences between maxillary and mandibular deciduous and permanent canines in males and females, and thus, canines are key teeth in gender determination and may act as a valuable tool in cases of mass disaster and when the bodies are decomposed or in extreme burnt cases.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study group consisted of 150 participants from Bagalkot district. Out of which, 100 were adults (50 males and 50 females) in the age group of 17–30 years and 50 were children (25 boys and 25 girls) in the age group of 3–6 years. The inclusion criteria for the study are as follows:
- No diagnosed dental or periodontal disease
- No worn tips at the cervical thirds
- No cultural or cosmetic modification
- No restoration–cervical thirds–mesial/distal surface
- No crown restoration, orthodontic treatment and/or trauma.
Partially erupted/ectopically erupted teeth, patients with dental/occlusal abnormalities, teeth showing physiologic/pathologic wear and tear as with bruxism were excluded from the study.
Maxillary and mandibular impressions of all the samples were made with alginate and the study models were prepared in dental stone [Figure 1]. On the study model, the following measurements were taken for all the participants using digital vernier caliper.
|Figure 1: (a and b) Maxillary and mandibular impressions of all the samples made with alginate and study models were prepared in dental stone|
Click here to view
- Clinical crown height (CCH)
- Maximum mesiodistal diameter (MMD)
- Maximum buccolingual width (MBL).
Clinical crown height
The CCH was measured from the tip of the cusp to the cervical line of canine using digital vernier caliper [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: (a and b) The clinical crown height was measured from the tip of the cusp to the cervical line of canine using digital vernier caliper|
Click here to view
Maximum mesiodistal diameter
The maximum width of canine teeth was taken as greatest mesiodistal width on either side of the jaw [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: The maximum width of canine teeth was taken as greatest mesiodistal width on either side of the jaw|
Click here to view
Maximum buccolingual width
The maximum width of canine buccolingually was measured using digital vernier calipers [Figure 4].
|Figure 4: The maximum width of canine buccolingually was measured using digital vernier calipers|
Click here to view
According to Garn and Lewis, sexual dimorphism: (Xm/Xf) − 1 × 100
- Xm = mean value of measurement for males
- Xf = mean value of measurement for females.
All the measurements were noted, and the statistical analysis was done using SPSS graduate pack 11.5 for windows, (SPSS Inc., Chicago III, USA) to evaluate the data using Student's t-test and discriminant function analysis.
| Results|| |
[Table 1] shows a comparison of males and females with respect to CCH, MMD and MBL in the right and left sides of maxillary and mandibular deciduous teeth by t-test. [Table 2] with discriminant function analysis between male and female deciduous maxillary canine teeth is showing statistically significant value, whereas [Table 3] showing discriminant function analysis between male and female deciduous mandibular canine teeth did not show statistically significant value. [Table 4] shows a comparison of males and females with respect to CCH, MMD and MBL in the right and left sides of maxillary and mandibular teeth of permanent dentition by t-test. [Table 5] and [Table 6] show discriminant function analysis between male and female maxillary and mandibular teeth of permanent dentition.
|Table 1: Comparison of males and females with respect to clinical crown height, maximum mesiodistal diameter and maximum buccolingual width in the right and left sides of maxillary and mandibular teeth of deciduous by t-test|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Comparison of males and females with respect to clinical crown height, maximum mesiodistal diameter and maximum buccolingual width in the right and left sides of maxillary and mandibular teeth of permanent by t-test|
Click here to view
Applying student's t-test results showed a significant difference. Significant differences were found between maxillary and mandibular deciduous canines in males and female children using three dimensions, except mandibular canines CCH did not show a significant difference.
In permanent dentition applying discriminant function analysis, CCH and MMD showed significant differences except maxillary canines not showing significant differences in MBL (P < 0.05).
| Discussion|| |
Identification is the basis of individuality of a person. Numerous methods of identification are in use. Although these methods have their own merits, there are limitations too, as they might not fit in all situations. Dentition is one part of the body that resists all environmental insults for maximum time and thus can be a valuable tool in identification.
“Morphological characteristic” data of deciduous teeth are very valuable tools for pediatric dentists, orthodontists and anthropologists in treating malocclusion and in identification of the diseased in crimes. A study by Richardson and Malhotra revealed that both the mean mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions were larger in boys than in girls. Margetts and Brown showed that mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of the deciduous dentition of males were larger than that of females for all primary tooth types. Koora et al. in their study revealed that the mean mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of maxillary and mandibular canines showed a greater significant difference in males than in females. Black, in his study, proved the sexual dimorphism in the tooth crown diameter of the deciduous teeth. Similar results were reported in this study in case of deciduous teeth, and the results were found to be statistically significant, except mandibular canine, wherein CCH does not show a significant difference (P < 0.05). This study did not employ univariate statistics (Al Ri Faiy et al. 1997, Boaz and Gupta 2009 and Potter et al., 1981) of measurements. As it is concerned with the three dimensions and their interactions which is more useful in predicting sex.
According to the present study, there exists a significant sexual dimorphism in all canine dimensions, both maxillary and mandibular, as shown by the results. However, among all dimensions, CCH and MMD show very significant difference among permanent canines. Similarly incase of deciduous dentition significant differences were found between maxillary and mandibular canine in male and females using three dimensions except mandibular canine CCH did not show a significant difference. However the study with larger samples can increase the accuracy of the findings.
Multivariate methods in sex determination based on teeth measurements have been explored by Ditch and Rose and Acharya and Mainali. However, the studies are multivariate not only in dimensions but also in terms of teeth – their formulae cannot be applied on human remains with incomplete or missing teeth. The present study, on the other hand, can be useful in cases even when only one canine in good condition is present.
| Conclusion|| |
From the present study, it can be concluded that there is a significant sexual dimorphism in maxillary and mandibular in both permanent and deciduous dentition canines of the Bagalkot population. There is no evidence of reverse dimorphism in permanent teeth where dimensional measurements are greater in females than in males.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Rastogi P, Jain A, Kotian S, Rastogi S. Sexual dimorphism – An odontometric approach. Anthropology 2013;1:1-4.
Kieser JA. Human Adult Odontometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
Parekh D, Patel SV, Zalawadia AZ, Patel SM. Odontometric study of maxillary canine teeth to establish sexual dimorphism in gujrat population. Int J Biol Med Res 2012;3:1935-7.
Suazo GI, Cantin LM, Lopez FB, et al
. Sexual Dimorphism in mesiodistal and buccolingual tooth dimensions in Chilean people. Int. J. Morphol. 2008;26:609-14.
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Buccolingual size asymmetry and its developmental meaning. Angle Orthod 1967;37:186-93.
Koora K, Sriram CH, Muthu MS, Chandrasekhar Rao R, Sivakumar N. Morphological characteristics of primary dentition in children of chennai and hyderabad. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010;28:60-7.
] [Full text]
Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of american negroes. Am J Orthod 1975;68:157-64.
Margetts B, Brown T. Crown diameters of the deciduous teeth in australian aboriginals. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;48:493-502.
Black TK 3rd
. Sexual dimorphism in the tooth-crown diameters of the deciduous teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;48:77-82.
Boaz K, Gupta C. Dimorphism in human maxillary and mandibular canines in establishment of gender. JOFS 2009;1:42-4.
Ditch LE, Rose JC. A multivariate dental sexing technique. Am J Phys Anthropol 1972;37:61-4.
Acharya AB, Mainali S. Are dental indexes useful in sex assessment? J Forensic Odontostomatol 2008;26:53-9.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]