Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 158-161
 

Oral pulse granuloma associated with ameloblastoma: Report of a case and review of literature


1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, MGV's Dental College, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Oral Surgery, MGV's Dental College, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission15-Feb-2016
Date of Acceptance26-Dec-2016
Date of Web Publication5-Apr-2017

Correspondence Address:
Uma Vasant Datar
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Sangli - 416 415, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-029X.203766

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Oral pulse granuloma (PG) is a rare lesion that presents as a foreign body granulomatous reaction to implanted food particles of plant or vegetable origin. It is classified as a central or a peripheral lesion depending on the location. Rarely, a central oral PG may be associated with a cyst or tumor, thus leading to a deceptive histopathological picture. This is exemplified in the present case of 27-year-old female patient who reported with a swelling on the left posterior region of mandible which was diagnosed as ameloblastoma. The excisional specimen depicted a varied histopathological picture showing follicular ameloblastoma and foreign body granulomas associated with hyaline rings. Based on histopathological, histochemical and polarized microscopy findings; these hyaline rings were diagnosed to be remnants of a plant cell/legume. The aim of this article was to present a case of PG associated with ameloblastoma and discuss its histochemical and polarizing microscopic features.


Keywords: Follicular ameloblastoma, foreign body granuloma, oral pulse granuloma, oral vegetable granuloma


How to cite this article:
Datar UV, Patil RB, Mahajan AM, Dahivelkar S. Oral pulse granuloma associated with ameloblastoma: Report of a case and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2017;21:158-61

How to cite this URL:
Datar UV, Patil RB, Mahajan AM, Dahivelkar S. Oral pulse granuloma associated with ameloblastoma: Report of a case and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jul 24];21:158-61. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2017/21/1/158/203766





   Introduction Top


Oral pulse granuloma (PG) was reported by Lewars in 1971.[1] Endogenous theory[2],[3] and exogenous theory[4],[5],[6],[7] have been put forth to explain the etiology of PG. The exogenous theory is most accepted, and the lesion is termed as “pulse granuloma” since it is a foreign body reaction to entrapped leguminous food/pulses.[5],[6] Microscopically, PG is characterized by the presence of giant cells and hyaline rings.[6] PG has been reported in the walls of odontogenic cysts.[5],[7],[8],[9],[10] Only one case has been reported till date of PG associated with ameloblastoma.[9] Herein, we report a case of PG associated with ameloblastoma and discuss its etiopathogenesis, polarizing microscopy and histochemical findings.


   Case Report Top


A 27-year-old female patient presented with a history of swelling in mandibular left posterior region for 1 year and pain for 1 month [Figure 1]. Intraoral examination revealed a bony hard swelling extending from the left mandibular second premolar till retromolar area. Obliteration of buccal and lingual vestibule was noted. The mucosa overlying the lesion appeared normal. The patient had undergone extraction of mandibular first molar of the same side earlier.
Figure 1: Clinical photograph shows a diffuse solitary swelling on the left side of the face, involving the angle of mandible

Click here to view


The radiographic examination revealed a multilocular radiolucency involving left mandibular region [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b. The lesion extended from the second premolar and posteriorly it involved the coronoid and the condylar processes. The expansion of buccal and lingual plate of the mandible was evident on occlusal radiographic images. Differential diagnoses of ameloblastoma and keratocystic odontogenic tumor were considered. Incisional biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of follicular ameloblastoma. Based on the histopathological diagnosis, segmental block resection was carried out with the surgical margin 1 cm away from the radiographic boundary of the lesion. The excised specimen was sent for histopathological diagnosis. No evidence of recurrence was noted after 1 year of resection.
Figure 2: (a) Orthopantomograph showing multilocular radiolucency in the mandibular body-ramus area on the left side. (b) Cone beam computed tomography image showing buccal expansion due to the lesion

Click here to view


The gross specimen showed expansion of buccal and lingual plates of mandible and bone erosion in the retromolar area. On grossing, a large cystic lesion was noted involving body and ramus of mandible. Microscopic examination of the excised tissue specimen revealed follicles of ameloblastoma of varying sizes [Figure 3]a. The stroma was mature, collagenous and it demonstrated foreign body granulomas with numerous multinucleated giant cells [Figure 3]b and [Figure 3]c. On careful examination, it was evident that these foreign body granulomas were associated with multiple, amorphous, eosinophilic masses enclosed in densely hyalinized eosinophilic matrix/rings [Figure 3]b and [Figure 3]c.
Figure 3: (a) Photomicrograph demonstrating follicles of ameloblastoma in mature fibrous stroma (H&E, ×10). (b) Foreign body and associated granulomas (H&E, ×10). (c) Multinucleated giant cells phagocytosing hyaline ring-like foreign particles (H&E, ×40). (d) The foreign body demonstrating periodic acid.Schiff positivity (periodic acid-Schiff, ×10)

Click here to view


Histochemical staining was done to understand the nature of hyaline rings. The hyaline rings were periodic acid–Schiff positive [Figure 3]d. The peripheral portion of the foreign body was positive for Masson's trichrome stain suggesting it to be condensation of collagen.

To prove the similarity of the foreign body and plant cells, grains such as gram, wheat, rice, split pigeon pea were boiled and processed. Moreover, vegetables such as carrot, cabbage were processed raw. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff. We observed that a section of a legume [Figure 4]b bore a striking resemblance, to the foreign body we encountered. Both the legume and the foreign body showed peripherally smaller angular to rectangular cells and centrally larger cells enclosing amorphous substance. When viewed under polarized light, the hyaline structures exhibited birefringence [Figure 5]a and [Figure 5]b and the fragments of material similar to hyaline rings were noted within the giant cells [Figure 5]c and [Figure 5]d.
Figure 4: (a) Foreign body showing peripheral smaller rectangular cells (demonstrated by arrowhead) and arrow pointing larger more angular cells in the center enclosing amorphous eosinophilic material (H&E, ×40). (b) Processed pulse showing structure similar to the foreign body (H&E, ×40)

Click here to view
Figure 5: (a and b) Photomicrographs showing the features of irregular foreign body particles in light microscopy and polarizing microscopy, respectively (H&E, ×40). (c and d) Foreign body giant cells with ingested material which shows birefringence and hence is evident on polarizing microscopy (H&E, ×40)

Click here to view


Based on these observations, the foreign bodies were identified as remnants of food particles of vegetable origin. To rule out other local and systemic granulomatosis, hematological investigations were done, and the results were within normal limits. Tuberculosis was ruled out by normal findings of chest radiography and negative tuberculin test. Hence, the lesion was diagnosed as follicular ameloblastoma with PG. Patient's consent has been obtained for publishing clinical findings and images.


   Discussion Top


PG is a rare granulomatous lesion characterized with so-called hyaline ring structures which are always associated with multinucleated giant cells.[4] PG is known by many terminologies such as chronic periostitis,[1] giant cell hyaline angiopathy,[2] hyaline ring granuloma,[3] vegetable granuloma[4] and oral pulse/hyaline ring granuloma.[5]

According to a recent review by Philipsen and Reichart,[5] 173 cases of PG have been reported till date. In oral and maxillofacial region, these lesions often are noted in association with odontogenic and nonodontogenic cysts, but very rarely in odontogenic tumors.[5],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] Talacko and Radden[7] in their retrospective study, found evidence of PG in periapical lesions and odontogenic cysts which were missed initially at the time of diagnosis. Similarly, Henriques et al.[10] retrospectively studied inflammatory odontogenic cysts and found that 3.3% (22 of 661 cases) of inflammatory cysts were associated with PG. In the majority of cases, the response to foreign body is minimal; hence, it can be missed and which may be reason for underreporting of PG.[11] Thorough literature search revealed that only one case of PG has been reported in association with ameloblastoma.[9] This may be because the prevalence of ameloblastoma is low, and histopathologists are unfamiliar with PG; hence, such a lesion may have been overlooked in the past.

Over the years, etiopathogenesis of PG has invited a lot of controversies. Two paradoxical theories have been proposed to explain the etiopathogenesis of PG.

  1. The endogenous theory states that the hyaline rings originate due to degenerative change in blood vessels[2] or due to extravasated serum proteins[3]
  2. The exogenous theory states that PG is a foreign body granuloma, which is induced by the presence of food particles of vegetable/plant origin.


Harrison and Martin[4] proved the vegetable nature of hyaline rings based on ultrastructure findings. Talacko and Radden[6] through animal model have suggested that PG results from traumatic implantation of food particle of plant origin. The starch in the plant cell gets digested easily leaving behind cellulose which is undigestable and it invokes a granulomatous response. The cellulose of legumes is more noxious than other vegetable cells because of its resistance to digestion by phagocytes. They also have suggested that legumes are rich in phytohemagglutinin, which are known to have granuloma enhancing properties.[6]

PG may present as a central lesion or a peripheral lesion. In case of the central lesions, the theory of exogenous origin is based on the premise that the implantation of vegetable particles occurs through extraction sockets, pericoronal flap, grossly decayed teeth, deep periodontal pockets, unfilled canals and through a pathological communication with oral cavity.[8],[9] In the present case, perforation of cortical plates was noted in the retromolar area which could have helped in entry of vegetable matter.

Microscopically, PG is characterized by aggregates of thick eosinophilic hyaline matrix or hyaline rings surrounded by chronic inflammatory cells and multinucleated giant cells. The number of giant cells is variable, and the stroma may or may not be fibrosed. These hyaline rings are of varying size, shape and thickness. The hyaline rings often enclose starch.[4] This characteristic arrangement is reminiscent of vegetable starch cell.[5] A legume (pulse) has an outer shell surrounding a cotyledon. The cotyledon has a honeycomb structure within which stored food, i.e., starch is noted.[12] In the present case, the foreign body was composed of vertically oriented stratified cells. The cells at periphery were rectangular, joined end to end; each cell had a well-defined cell wall. The outer rectangular cells demonstrate thick outer wall which indicates it to be a part of seed coat [Figure 4]a. Thus, the histology of foreign body in present case bore a striking resemblance to a cooked legume [Figure 4]b. Hence, we are of the opinion that the term “oral PG” is more appropriate for this lesion.

The hyaline rings have been reported to be birefringent under polarized light[6],[8] which was evident in the present case. Numerous giant cells were seen to contain ingested birefringent material [Figure 5]b and [Figure 5]d.

The chronic granulomatous reaction triggered by cellulose moiety of PG may be confused with other granulomatous lesions such as tuberculosis, Wegener's granulomatosis, midline lethal granuloma, Crohn's disease, allergic oral granulomatosis, Melkersson–Rosenthal syndrome and sarcoidosis to name a few.[9] In the present case, erythrocyte sedimentation rate was not raised, hemoglobin levels, differential white blood cell, total white blood cell and red blood cell counts were within normal limits. The systemic granulomatosis was ruled out based on the absence of clinical signs and negative hematological investigations.[9]

According to Philipsen and Reichart,[5] for diagnosis of PG, the following histopathological features are essential:

  • Eosinophilic hyaline rings in the form of circular homogenous or fibrillar masses
  • A chronic inflammatory lesion
  • Foreign body giant cells.


Thus, the histopathological, histochemical, polarizing microscopy findings and the observations of Philipsen and Reichart[5] lead to the final diagnosis of PG. Adequate tissue sampling, serial sectioning, use of special stains and microscopy techniques may be beneficial to establish the diagnosis of PG. The treatment of PG is complete excision and it does not recur after excision.[8]


   Conclusion Top


We report a rare case of PG associated with follicular ameloblastoma and highlight the diagnostic features of PG. The present case emphasizes that histopathologists should be acquainted with PG to avoid misdiagnosis, especially when it occurs in conjunction with other discrete histopathologic entity.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Lewars PH. Chronic periostitis in the mandible underneath artificial dentures. Br J Oral Surg 1971;8:264-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Dunlap CL, Barker BF. Giant-cell hyalin angiopathy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;44:587-91.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chen SY, Fantasia JE, Miller AS. Hyaline bodies in the connective tissue wall of odontogenic cysts. J Oral Pathol 1981;10:147-57.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Harrison JD, Martin IC. Oral vegetable granuloma: Ultrastructural and histological study. J Oral Pathol 1986;15:322-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Philipsen HP, Reichart PA. Pulse or hyaline ring granuloma. Review of the literature on etiopathogenesis of oral and extraoral lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:121-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Talacko AA, Radden BG. The pathogenesis of oral pulse granuloma: An animal model. J Oral Pathol 1988;17:99-105.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Talacko AA, Radden BG. Oral pulse granuloma: Clinical and histopathological features. A review of 62 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:343-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kotrashetti VS, Angadi PV, Mane DR, Hallikerimath SR. Oral pulse granuloma associated with keratocystic odontogenic tumor: Report of a case and review on etiopathogenesis. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2011;1:83-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Manjunatha BS, Kumar GS, Raghunath V. Histochemical and polarization microscopic study of two cases of vegetable/pulse granuloma. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19:74-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Henriques AC, Pereira JS, Nonaka CF, Freitas RA, Pinto LP, Miguel MC. Analysis of the frequency and nature of hyaline ring granulomas in inflammatory odontogenic cysts. Int Endod J 2013;46:20-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Keskin A, Duran S, Alkan A, Günhan O. Hyaline ring granuloma in inflammatory odontogenic cysts: Report of two cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:115-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Desai RS. Hyaline ring granuloma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2015;19:120-1.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,873 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1550    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded154    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007