|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 371-374
Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis
Renu Sukumaran, Thara Somanathan, Jayasree Kattoor
Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
|Date of Submission||27-Jan-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Dec-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||21-Jan-2016|
Regional Cancer Centre, Medical College Campus, Post Bag No. 2417, Trivandrum, Kerala
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma (OGCC) is an exceptionally rare malignant odontogenic epithelial tumor. It is characterized by ameloblastic-like islands of epithelial cells with aberrant keratinization in the form of ghost cells with varying amounts of dysplastic dentin. Malignant histological characteristics include infiltration, cellular pleomorphism, numerous mitosis and necrosis. Its biological behavior varies from slow-growing locally invasive lesions to rapidly growing highly aggressive tumors. OGCC metastasizing to distant sites is extremely rare. Only three cases of metastasis have been reported in literature. We are reporting the case of a 54-year-old male patient who presented with tender swelling in the malar region. Histopathological examination revealed OGCC and he received postoperative radiotherapy. Two years later, he presented with a lung mass. Biopsy from the lung lesion showed the same morphology as that of maxillary tumor with scattered ghost cells. This case points to the aggressive behavior of OGCC and its metastatic potential. It also highlights the need for long-term follow-up of these patients.
Keywords: Maxillary pathology, odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma, odontogenic tumors, pulmonary metastasis
|How to cite this article:|
Sukumaran R, Somanathan T, Kattoor J. Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2015;19:371-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Sukumaran R, Somanathan T, Kattoor J. Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Sep 28];19:371-4. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2015/19/3/371/174626
| Introduction|| |
Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma (OGCC) is a rare odontogenic tumor characterized by the presence of ghost cells. It can appear as a de novo tumor or may arise in a preexisting calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC). Until now, only 31 cases of OGCCs have been reported in literature. Because of the limited number of published cases, the clinical behavior of the tumor is not well-understood. Local recurrences have been reported, but distant metastasis is extremely rare. Only three cases of metastasis have been reported in medical literature.
| Case Report|| |
A 54-year-old male presented with pain in the left malar prominence and epistaxis.
On examination, there was tenderness in the malar region. Intraorally left gingivobuccal sulcus showed a smooth swelling measuring 3 cm × 3 cm. Imaging showed irregular soft tissue density mass in the left maxillary antrum measuring 4.6 cm × 4.5 cm × 3.8 cm with destruction of the wall.
Biopsy revealed poorly differentiated carcinoma. Total maxillectomy was done.
The maxillectomy specimen showed a solid gray-white growth, filling the antrum. Microscopy showed a neoplasm composed of islands of odontogenic epithelium resembling that of ameloblastoma [Figure 1] and epithelial cells transforming into ghost cells [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]. There were areas of calcification and necrosis. Focal cellular areas composed of pleomorphic cells with increased nuclear cytoplasmic ratio and hyperchromatic nuclei were noted. Mitotic rate was high in these cellular areas [Figure 5]. MIB1 labeling index was around 50–60%, suggesting high proliferative activity. Based on these findings, diagnosis of ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma was made.
|Figure 1: Photomicrograph showing ameloblastoma-like epithelial proliferation and hemorrhagic areas (H&E stain, ×100)|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Photomicrograph showing islands of epithelial cells admixed with ghost cells (H&E stain, ×100)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Photomicrograph highlighting the features of ghost cells with loss of nuclei and preserved cell outlines (H&E stain, ×200)|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Area of high cellularity with increased number of mitotic figures (H&E stain, ×200)|
Click here to view
The patient was given postoperative radiotherapy. Two years later, the patient presented with dyspnea. Imaging showed a mass lesion in the lower lobe of the lung. Biopsy of the lung mass showed the similar morphology as the maxillary tumor with ghost cells [Figure 6]. Tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin and p63 and were negative for TTF1 and CK7 [Figure 7].
|Figure 7: Immunohistochemistry on lung tumor showing (a) cytokeratin.positivity (IHC stain, ×100), (b) p63-positivity (IHC stain, ×200) (c) CK7-negativity(IHC stain ×200) and (d) TTF1-negativity (IHC stain, ×200)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
OGCC is an extremely rare malignancy. Only 31 cases have been reported to date., More than half of the reported cases are from Asia. Males are more commonly affected with male: female ratio of 2:1. The peak incidence occurred in the fourth decade with age ranging from 13 to 72 years., OGCC generally appears as a painful, hard swelling in the maxilla or mandible.
OGCC is believed to be one end of the spectrum of a heterogeneous entity known as COC also known as Gorlin cyst, first identified by Gorlin in 1962. In the initial years, COC was considered a nonneoplastic cyst. However, later, some of these lesions showed a solid component also. In 1981, Praetorius et al. classified COCs into cystic and neoplastic (solid) types. They further classified the cystic type into three subtypes such as simple unicystic, odontoma-producing type and ameloblastomatous proliferating type. The neoplastic (solid) type was called dentinogenic ghost cell tumor because of its tendency to produce dentinoid material. Hong et al. proposed the term epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumor (EOGCT) to these neoplastic solid types and these authors classified the neoplastic form of COC into ameloblastoma ex COC, peripheral EOGCT (which occurred in gingival or alveolar mucosa) and central EOGCT (which occurred intraosseously). Ledesma-Montes et al. divided the calcifying cystic odantogenic tumors into four subtypes which included simple cystic, odontoma associated, ameloblastomatous proliferating and CCOT associated with benign odontogenic tumors other than odontomas. They separated the dentinogenic ghost cell tumor into central aggressive DGCT and a peripheral nonaggressive counterpart.
The WHO considered all COC as neoplastic and termed the cystic form as calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor and the neoplastic solid form as dentinogenic ghost cell tumor whereas ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma is a malignant odontogenic epithelial tumor with features of one or both of these lesions. In 1985, Ikemura et al. described the first well-documented case of malignancy arising in a COC. In their case report, there were areas of COC and foci of malignant transformation.
The histological features of OGCC are an ameloblastoma-like epithelial proliferation, ghost cells that may be calcified, admixed with areas of atypical features such as increased cellularity, pleomorphism, mitosis, necrosis and infiltrative growth pattern., The accurate diagnosis of OGCC requires extensive sampling of the specimen as the features of malignancy can be focal and the other areas may show benign histology.
The ghost cells are a characteristic feature of OGCC. They are large polygonal epithelial cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm that have lost their nuclei but maintain a faint outline of cellular and nuclear membrane. The intracytoplasmic keratin preserves the cell outline and the corresponding previous site of the nucleus., These cells are resistant to degradation. According to Gorlin, the ghost cells represent different stages of normal or abnormal keratinization. Levy proposed that the formation of ghost cells is due to squamous metaplasia of odontogenic epithelium caused by ischemia. In general, the cell outlines of ghost cells are well-defined but, in some cases, it may be blurred. In such cases, groups of ghost cells will appear fused. Ghost cells may undergo dystrophic type of calcification. Roh et al. that suggested some of the cytokines produced by ghost cells play roles in the bone resorption. They detected tartrate resistant acid phosphatase and vitronectin receptor in the ghost cells. Another feature of OGCC is the formation of dentinoid or osteoid material.
The biological behavior of OGCC is unpredictable. These tumors may be indolent or locally aggressive. It can behave as slowly growing locally aggressive neoplasm or rapidly growing highly invasive tumor. The overall 5-year survival rate is estimated to be 73%., In the first case of OGCC described by Ikemura et al., the patient died due to brain invasion. Locally aggressive and frequently recurring tumors have been reported, but distant metastasis is definitely uncommon. Review of literature shows only three previous cases of metastatic OGCC. In the case described by Grodjesk et al., the patient died due to lung metastasis. In the second case, the patient developed metastasis in the skin, lung and brain. The third case was reported by Cheng et al. where the patient developed metastasis in the cranium. In our case, 2 years after the initial diagnosis, the patient developed metastasis in the lung. Because of the unpredictable biological behavior of the tumor, a long-term follow-up is recommended.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Cheng Y, Long X, Li X, Bian Z, Chen X, Yang X. Clinical and radiological features of odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: Review of the literature and report of four new cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:152-7.
Nazaretian SP, Schenberg ME, Simpson I, Slootweg PJ. Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:455-8.
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. p. 293-5.
Lu Y, Mock D, Takata T, Jordan RC. Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma: Report of four new cases and review of the literature. J Oral Pathol Med 1999;28:323-9.
Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ, Odont, Clausen FP, Vickers RA. The calcifying odontogenic cyst – A possible analogue of the cutaneous calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe. An analysis of fifteen cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1962;15:1235-43.
Praetorius F, Hjørting-Hansen E, Gorlin RJ, Vickers RA. Calcifying odontogenic cyst. Range, variations and neoplastic potential. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:227-40.
Hong SP, Ellis GL, Hartman KS. Calcifying odontogenic cyst. A review of ninety-two cases with reevaluation of their nature as cysts or neoplasms, the nature of ghost cells, and subclassification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:56-64.
Ledesma-Montes C, Gorlin RJ, Shear M, Prae Torius F, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Altini M,et al
. International collaborative study on ghost cell odontogenic tumours: Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour, dentinogenic ghost cell tumour and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37:302-8.
Ikemura K, Horie A, Tashiro H, Nandate M. Simultaneous occurrence of a calcifying odontogenic cyst and its malignant transformation. Cancer 1985;56:2861-4.
Goldenberg D, Sciubba J, Tufano RP. Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2004;26:378-81.
Grodjesk JE, Dolinsky HB, Schneider LC, Dolinsky EH, Doyle JL. Odontogenic ghost cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:576-81.
Roh GS, Jeon BT, Park BW, Kim DR, Hah YS, Kim JH, et al.
Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma of the mandible: A case report demonstrating expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and vitronectin receptor. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:419-23.
Kao SY, Pong BY, Li WY, Gallagher GT, Chang RC. Maxillary odontogenic carcinoma with distant metastasis to axillary skin, brain, and lung: Case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:229-32.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]