|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 150
Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia masquerading as benign cementoblastoma: A diagnostic dilemma
Gayathri S Rao1, Muralidhar G Kamalapur2, Swetha Acharya3
1 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Radio-diagnosis and Imaging, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||6-May-2014|
Gayathri S Rao
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad 580 009, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Context: Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD) is a fibro-osseous lesion that is a nonneoplastic reactive lesion. Case Report: A case of 47-year-old female patient presenting with a diagnostic dilemma to the clinician is reported. Methods to achieve definitive diagnosis are discussed. Conclusions: FCOD can present with features of periapical pathology or other osseous lesions. Hence, to arrive at a definitive diagnosis biopsy and histopathologic examination is imperative.
Keywords: Cemento-osseous dysplasia, fibro-osseous lesion, focal cemento-osseous dysplasia, periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia
|How to cite this article:|
Rao GS, Kamalapur MG, Acharya S. Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia masquerading as benign cementoblastoma: A diagnostic dilemma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2014;18:150
|How to cite this URL:|
Rao GS, Kamalapur MG, Acharya S. Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia masquerading as benign cementoblastoma: A diagnostic dilemma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 Sep 19];18:150. Available from: https://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2014/18/1/150/131949
| Introduction|| |
Focal cemento-osseous dysplasias (FCOD) are benign fibro-osseous lesions of the jaw. The term focal cemento-osseous dysplasia was coined by Summerlin and Tomich.  Formerly Waldron reported the case and named it as localized fibro-osseous cemental lesion observing its localized nature.  The etiology is unknown but is thought to be reactive in nature secondary to injury like former tooth extractions. 
FCOD is termed when it is seen in the posterior quadrant in the periapical region of vital teeth. If the same process is seen in the anterior region then periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia (PCOD) is used. 
Mostly FCOD is asymptomatic and is discovered only on radiographic examination.  When FCOD is present in close approximation or attached to the tooth root, the diagnosis can be bewildering with periapical pathology or other lesions thus necessitating a histological examination.
| Case report|| |
A 47-year-old female patient reported to the department of oral diagnostics with pain in the left lower back region and food lodgedment in the right lower back region of the jaw for 1 year.
The pain was severe throbbing type that aggravated on sleeping and consuming food. It was relieved on taking analgesics. Clinically, on examination there was decayed 38 that was of concern. On right lower jaw missing 46 and silver amalgam restored 47 was seen [Figure 1]a.
|Figure 1: (a) Intraoral view revealing silver amalgam-restored 47, (b) Intraoral periapical radiograph of 47 revealing a well-defi ned radiopacity surrounded by uniform radiolucent halo at the periapex of 47. DVT of 47 region, (c) DVT further characterizing the lesion in three different sections and its relationship with the tooth, (d) Surgically extracted tooth specimen, (e) Postoperative intra-oral radiograph revealing the site of extraction and curettage|
Click here to view
An intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPA) was advised as a part of investigative procedure for 38 and 47. Tooth 38 showed periapical pathology suggesting abscess and tooth 47 showed an interesting finding in the periapical region. Crown showed radiopacity involving occlusal and mesial aspect with a distal radiolucency involving the crown suggestive of dentinal caries. Periapically, a small well-defined radiopacity was seen in relation to mesial root that was attached to the apex of the root measuring approximately 1 cm [Figure 1]b. Surrounding the radiopacity a uniform radiolucent halo was seen. To enhance the view, digital volume tomography (DVT) was taken [Figure 1]c. Coronal, axial and sagittal view of the concerned area showed a rounded well-defined radiopaque mass attached to the root of the respective tooth surrounded by a well-defined radiolucent halo. A differential diagnosis of condensing osteitis and benign cementoblastoma was considered. Other lesions considered were PCOD and osteoblastoma.
Further, vitality test of 47, 48, 37 and 38 was carried out. Tooth of concern 47 showed delayed response, indicating that the tooth was vital. Teeth 48 and 37 were vital, whereas 38 was nonresponsive.
Based on the findings of the vitality test, IOPA of 47 and DVT, a diagnosis of benign cementoblastoma was made. It was decided to extract 47 along with the periapical mass followed by a through curettage. The specimen was obtained as gritty fragments [Figure 1]d inset] and was sent for histopathologic examination.
The decalcified sections showed anastomosing curvilinear bony trabeculae (ginger root pattern) in a fibrous stroma with basophilic outlines, noted focally [Figure 2]a and b]. Areas of hemorrhage were appreciated close to the mineralized masses [Figure 2]b. Section from other fragments revealed cellular mesenchymal tissue composed of spindle-shaped fibroblasts, collagen fibers and several engorged capillaries with mixture of short, irregular and thick trabeculae of immature bone/and irregular basophilic cementum-like masses [Figure 2]c]. Irregular thick trabeculae of immature bone with osteocytes and osteoblastic rimming [Figure 2]d and few osteoclasts on the edge of bony trabecule within a homogenous fibro-cellular background [Figure 2]e were also evident.
|Figure 2: (a) Photomicrograph reveals anastomosing curvilinear bony trabeculae in a fi brous connective tissue stroma (H&E stain, x100), (b) Photomicrograph reveals anastomosing curvilinear bony trabeculae (ginger root pattern) with interspersed hemorrhage (arrow) (H&E stain, x40), (c) Photomicrograph depicts irregular thick trabeculae immature bone and irregular basophilic cementum-like structures scattered in a cellular mesenchymal tissue (H&E stain, x100), (d) Photomicrograph represents immature bony trabeculae with osteocytes and osteoblastic rimming (arrows) (H&E stain, x400), (e) Photomicroragph shows the presence of osteoclasts on the edge of bony trabecule within a fi brocellular stroma (arrow) (H&E stain, x400)|
Click here to view
Based on the findings of the histopathology, a final diagnosis of FCOD was made. No postoperative complications were seen [Figure 1e] and patient was followed up for a period of 6 months with no signs of recurrence.
| Discussion|| |
FCODs are subcategory of cemento-osseous dysplasia that are nonneoplastic reactive lesions.
They occur either in the periapical region of vital teeth or at the sites of previous extraction.  In the initial stage (osteolytic stage), they appear radiolucent radiographically and in the later stage (osteosclerotic stage), they have mixed radiolucent-radiopaque appearance with ill-defined borders.  In the present case, the lesion was mostly radiopaque and the unusual thing about the case was that it was attached to the tooth root with a uniform radiolucent halo thereby presenting a diagnostic dilemma of benign cementoblastoma as diagnosis. However, procuring the lesion in fragments along with the histopathologic features aided in the definitive diagnosis of FCOD.
Histologically, FCOD has features similar to cemento-ossifying fibromas (COF). The ossifying fibromas are neoplasms that contain a capsule and thus are surgically removed as a single whole lesion.  But in case of FCOD, lesion is obtained in fragments as seen in the present case. In FCOD, the trabeculae show ginger root pattern with thick curvilinear branching along with diffuse hemorrhage [Figure 2b] unlike COF.  Diagnosis is made considering the clinical, radiological and histopathologic features.
Once FCOD is diagnosed, no treatment is required other than a periodic follow up for recurrences.  In the current case, the case was followed up after excision of the lesion and showed no recurrence. But to arrive at a definitive diagnosis biopsy and histopathologic examination is imperative.
| Conclusion|| |
It is of paramount importance to follow up FCOD, as it can progress to florid COD where multiple posterior quadrants of the jaw are involved with the similar pathologic process.  Florid COD is difficult to manage and thus requires an early implementation of prophylaxis and good home oral hygiene care to control periodontal disease and prevent tooth loss. 
Other clinical importance of FCOD lies when ossteo-integrated implant is to be placed thereby making surgical removal of the lesion mandatory. 
| Acknowledgment|| |
Authors would like to thank the Principal, Dr. Shrinath Thakur, for technical support required for the case.
| References|| |
|1.||Summerlin DJ, Tomich CE. Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia: A clinicopathologic study of 221 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:611-20. |
|2.||Waldron CA. Fibro -osseous lesions of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43:249-62. |
|3.||Su L, Weathers DR, Waldron CA. Distinguishing features of focal cemento-osseous dysplasias and cemento-ossifying fibromas: I. A pathologic spectrum of 316 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:301-9. |
|4.||White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation. 5 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 500. |
|5.||Su L, Weathers DR, Waldron CA. Distinguishing features of focal cemento-osseous dysplasias and cemento-ossifying fibromas. II. A clinical and radiologic spectrum of 316 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:540-9. |
|6.||Dagistan S, Tozoglu U, Goregen M, Cakur B. Florid cemento- osseous dysplasia: A case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:E348-50. |
|7.||Macdonald-Jankowski DS. Focal cemento-osseous dysplasia: A systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:350-60. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]