Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ENIGMATIC MORPHO INSIGHT  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 18-19
 

The enigma of signet ring cells


Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pt. BD Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Date of Submission19-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance23-Mar-2020
Date of Web Publication08-May-2020

Correspondence Address:
Mala Kamboj
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pt. BD Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_77_20

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Sharma G, Kamboj M. The enigma of signet ring cells. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2020;24:18-9

How to cite this URL:
Sharma G, Kamboj M. The enigma of signet ring cells. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 4];24:18-9. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2020/24/1/18/283991




“Signet-ring” is a term used to describe the histologic appearance of a cell that presents as a large cytoplasmic vacuole, which compresses the nucleus in the form of a crescent, and the content of the vacuoles is variable (e.g., mucin, lipid, or glycogen).[1] It is seen in association with the basal layer of epithelium, although spinous layer may also be involved.[2] The histogenesis of signet ring cell (SRC) component is unclear. SRCs are an intermediate form of squamous or a glandular or mucin-secreting component.[3] The appearance of signet cells is a result of numerous mucin vacuoles that coalesce and compress the nucleus against the plasma membrane.[4] Ultrastructural examination has unveiled that vacuoles could represent cytoplasmic lumen, cytoplasmic pseudoinclusion, intracellular edema, or hydropic swelling of mitochondria.[1]

SRC change has been found in association with (a) carcinoma cells of the various body sites (gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, breast, lung, urinary bladder, prostate and salivary); (b) noncarcinomatous neoplasms (lymphoma and malignant melanoma); (c) nonneoplastic processes such as stromal nodule of prostate; and (d) precancerous condition such as oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF).[5],[6]

SRC could also result from different mechanisms such as mutations in the CDH1 gene, which encodes the important cell–cell adhesion glycoprotein E-cadherin.[7] Mucosal erosion and ischemia as a reactive change of damaged mucosa is another possible mechanism.[8] Although signet change is correlated with aggressive behavior of tumors such as gastric, prostate and ovary carcinoma, literature search has revealed two cases of benign salivary tumors with SRC and few malignant neoplasms such as adenocarcinomas where mucin-containing SRCs unexpectedly behaved as low-grade carcinomas.[1]

Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical studies showed intracytoplasmic lumens lined by a layer of short microvilli and positivity of the vacuole borders for epithelial membrane antigen and associated with the production of a secretory material. However, in these two cases, such production was not observed. This fact could be due to the removal of luminal substance during tissue processing, which leads to the empty appearance of cytoplasmic vacuoles. Immunohistochemical staining for keratin and alpha smooth muscle actin can be positive for SRCs.

Similarly, signet change has been reported in oral precancerous lesions such as OSMF [Figure 1] and [Figure 2], yet there is very limited data regarding their origin and mechanism of formation. Early studies on OSMF done in 1963 and 1964 by J. J. Pindborg and Sirsat involved four epidemiologic surveys on oral precancerous lesions which revealed atrophic epithelium exhibiting signet cells in 13% of cases.[6] In January 1970, studies done on 53 biopsies of suspected OSMF cases of 51 Indian villagers by Pindborg, Mehta and Daftary revealed 19.2% biopsies of OSMF, exhibiting a considerable number of signet cells, mostly in basal layers.[9]
Figure 1: A photomicrograph of oral submucous fibrosis showing signet ring cell change (H&E; ×40)

Click here to view
Figure 2: A hand-drawn illustration of signet ring cell change in oral submucous fibrosis ([1] Signet ring cell, [2] epithelium, [3] connective tissue)

Click here to view


In 1976, Pindborg et al. reported in detail the epithelial changes in OSMF, by studying 34 biopsy specimens and noticed in 91% of the cases a marked atrophy of the epithelium. Signet cell degeneration in the spinous cell layer and slight liquefaction in the basal cell layer were also observed.[2]

Hence, it was decided to evaluate this signet change in OSMF by staining with PAS, Mucicarmine and Alcian blue, which was negative for mucin, suggesting that it could be lost during processing, giving it the appearance of an empty vacuole. A possible hypothesis for formation could be mucosal erosion and ischemia as a reactive change of damaged mucosa. Although the mystery still shrouds the origin and presence of the signet cells, further evaluation is mandatory to decipher their origin.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Altemani A, Costa AF, Montalli VA, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Paes de Almeida O, León JE, et al. Signet-ring cell change in adenoid cystic carcinoma: A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of four cases. Histopathology 2013;62:531-42.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mani NJ, Singh B. Studies on oral submucous fibrosis. III. Epithelial changes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976;41:203-14.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kwon MS, Ko SO, Cho NP, Kim OH, Shin HK, Baek JA, et al. Gastric signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma metastatic to the gingiva: A case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:62-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Zappia JJ, Wolf GT, McClatchey KD. Signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma metastatic to the maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:89-90.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pindborg JJ, Poulsen HE, Zachariah J. Oral epithelial changes in thirty Indians with oral cancer and submucous fibrosis. Cancer 1967;20:1141-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pindborg J, Sirsat S. Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966;22:764-79.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Berx G, Becker KF, Höfler H, Van Roy F. Mutations of the human E-cadherin (CDH1) gene. Hum Mutat 1998;12:226-37.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Afsari A, Naab T, Hassan M. Diagnostic dilemma of epithelial signet ring cells in calculous cholecystitis. Am J Clin Pathol 2019;152 Suppl 1:S65.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Pindborg JJ, Mehta FS, Daftary DK. Occurrence of epithelial atypia in 51 Indian villagers with oral submucous fibrosis. Br J Cancer 1970;24:253-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (1,312 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed50    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded35    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007