Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ONLINE ONLY ARTICLES - FORENSIC CORNER  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 480
 

Sex determination using maxillary arch width of pediatric population of Namakkal district, India: A forensic study


1 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Vivekananda Dental College for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Rajah Muthiah Dental College and Hospital, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
4 Department of Pedodontic and Preventive Dentistry, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariar Dental College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
5 Vivekananda Dental College for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission31-Jul-2019
Date of Acceptance24-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication19-Dec-2019

Correspondence Address:
S Shankar
3-B, Marvel Signature Apartment, Thiruvagoundanoor Bypass, Salem - 636 005, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_226_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is to compute a new formula for sex determination using maxillary arch width of a pediatric population of Namakkal district.
Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 146 females and 218 males of South Indian origin aged between 4 and 6 years. Alginate impressions of the upper and lower dental arch were made, and casts were poured immediately. A digital vernier caliper was used to obtain measurements. Arch width at canine, first molar and second molar for both maxilla and mandible were considered for measurement. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 20.0 software.
Results: The Student's t-test was used to find out the significance between male and female among the different predictor variables at P < 0.05. Significant sexual dimorphism was found in maxillary intercanine width and maxillary first and second intermolar width with conical discriminant function coefficient of 0.732, −0.177 and −0.244, respectively.
Conclusion: The formula derived from the present study could be of great value in sex determination of pediatric populations of Namakkal district.


Keywords: Arch width, dimorphism, discriminant function analysis, sex determination


How to cite this article:
Shankar S, Nirmal R M, Aswathnarayanan M B, Kruthika M, Fathima M A. Sex determination using maxillary arch width of pediatric population of Namakkal district, India: A forensic study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019;23:480

How to cite this URL:
Shankar S, Nirmal R M, Aswathnarayanan M B, Kruthika M, Fathima M A. Sex determination using maxillary arch width of pediatric population of Namakkal district, India: A forensic study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 21];23:480. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2019/23/3/480/273493





   Introduction Top


Forensic science often uses the skeletal, dental remains as sources for human identification; in particular, the teeth and jaw are unique as they are always protected in a hard casting.[1] They are tissues characterized by structures with extraordinary resistance to putrefaction and effects of external agents that cause destruction of soft tissues of the body. Hence, the teeth and jaw form an excellent structure for forensic investigation.[2]

Sexual dimorphism is the systematic difference in form between males and females of the same species. Identification of sex is more significant in narrowing down a victim. It allows the exclusion of one-half of the population, thereby aiding a more precise search for the identity of the deceased.[3]

Sexual dimorphism in the orofacial tissue is of monumental value to the physical anthropologist due to its applications in forensic identification.[4] Arch width may provide insignificant feature differences among and within a population but form a stronger data for identification purposes.

Traditionally, mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) diameters of the crowns of teeth form the basis for assessing sex differences. Several studies have been conducted, which demonstrated significant sexual dimorphism in dimensions of permanent [5],[6],[7],[8],[9] and deciduous crowns [10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] using diagnostic dental casts, but only few studies are conducted using the arch width as parameters which were in permanent dentition.[17],[18],[19],[20]

This study emphasizes the importance of arch width in sexual dimorphism for the following reasons: (1) the pelvis, which is the most precise structural indicator, maybe fragmented, (2) sex characteristics in pediatric bone are not fully developed and (3) DNA analysis can give precise results but is expensive and relatively time-consuming.[21]

If sexual dimorphism in deciduous dentition is proved for its significance in sex determination like permanent dentition,[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] then it could be useful to precisely identify the sex of the children. Deciduous dentition-based studies have been carried out by Black,[22] De Vito and Saunders [23] and Zadzińska et al.,[24] they have published a series of discriminant functions for sex determination, but they have taken odontometric into consideration. On a thorough search of the literature in the English language, there is, however, no such evidence explored in the Indian population for deciduous dentition with arch width as parameters.

The magnitude and pattern of sexual dimorphism in the size of jaw differ from one population to another. Hence, there is a need for finding out differences in the arch width parameters in deciduous dentition among males and females of Indian natives with discriminant function, which may aid in establishing sex in juveniles.

MD, BL and the diagonal measurements of deciduous teeth of canines and molars were recorded in previous studies.[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27] However, the present study considered only the maxillary intercanine width (Max ICW) and intermolar width as a predictor variable in determining sex, and it was applicable in deriving the discriminant functions. To the best of our knowledge, this is a maiden attempt. The present study aimed to compute a new formula using discriminant function analysis and to verify the accuracy of such methods in sex determination by using maxillary arch width in children of Namakkal district from South Indian origin.


   Materials and Methods Top


Study design

The study was a cross-sectional study conducted for a period of 3 months.

Sample selection

The study sample consisted of 364 children who were selected from 940 children aged between 4 and 6 years of South Indian origin by cluster random sampling method. The clusters were government elementary schools in Namakkal district. Among the selected, 146 were girls and 218 were boys. The sample for the study included teeth that were fully erupted which had no caries, restorations, occlusion with flush terminal plane and participants with full complement of deciduous dentition were only considered. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee, JKK Natarajah Dental College and Hospital, Namakkal district, Tamil Nadu, India.

Procedures and parameters

Alginate impressions (Tropicalgin, Zhermack Clinical, New Jersey, USA) of the upper dental arch were made using perforated trays and casts were poured immediately with Type IV dental stone. A digital vernier caliper calibrated to an accuracy of 0.01 mm (Mitutoyo Absolute Digimatic Sliding Caliper, Tokyo, Japan, 0.05-mm resolution) was used for obtaining the measurements.

The arch width at canine, first molar and second molar of maxilla was considered for analysis [Figure 1]. All measurements were recorded by one of the investigators and calibration was done by the senior author. A total of three parameters were used as a predictor variable.
Figure 1: Line diagram showing the maxillary arch with different variables and measuring methods

Click here to view


The three variables included were Max ICW which is the distance between the cusp tips of canine [Figure 2], maxillary intermolar width at first molar which is the distance between the central fossa of first molars [Figure 3] and maxillary intermolar width at second molar which is the distance between the central fossa of second molars [Figure 4].
Figure 2: Measuring method for intercanine width of maxillary arch

Click here to view
Figure 3: Measuring method for inter first molar width of maxillary arch

Click here to view
Figure 4: Measuring method for intersecond molar width of maxillary arch

Click here to view


Reliability measures

To estimate intraobserver variability, a second determination was made after 2 months by the same investigator. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to access the intraobserver variability. The ICC for all the measurements were 0.953 (95% confidence interval: 0.914–0.992), indicating that the difference attributed to the measurement error was very small or practically nonexistent.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) was computed for each variable and Student's t-test was used to determine if statistically significant differences existed between the sexes. The level of significance was kept at P < 0.05. All the predictor variables were subjected to step-wise discriminant function analysis, which has the potential to optimally separate the sexes; further the statistical significance was assessed using Wilks' lambda. The variables having the higher discriminant function coefficient were included in the discriminant function for developing the formula.



Where DFS is the discriminant function score, df is the discriminant function coefficient, x is the score of the predictor variable, n is the sample size and C is the discriminant function constant.


   Results Top


The intraobserver reliability calculated during the second examination after 2 months revealed the ICC value to be 0.953. Hence, the measurements made at two different points showed negligible difference. Therefore, the initial measurements were taken into consideration for calculation.

In the observed mean dimensions, male values were higher than the female values for all parameters. The different predictor variables of arch width selected between male and females were subjected to Student's t-test, and the level of significance was P < 0.05. Statistically significant difference was found among Max ICW [Table 1].
Table 1: Student t-test for the comparison of all the predictor variables between both the sexes

Click here to view


Further, the parameters included in the functional analysis were checked for step-wise entry for the tests of equality of group means for its significance, and it was also found that they were statistically significant with P < 0.05 for the Max ICW [Table 2]. The overall Wilk's Lamda for all the predictor variables was calculated, and it showed a very high statistically significant value among the parameters with P < 0.05 [Table 3].
Table 2: Tests of equality of group means

Click here to view
Table 3: Overall Wilk's Lambda to test the significance among the predictor variables

Click here to view


[Table 4] shows the conical discriminant function coefficient values for the predictor variables which entered the functional analysis by Wilk's Lamda.
Table 4: Conical discriminant function coefficient of the entered predictor variables

Click here to view


The discriminant analysis produced the best discriminant functions, and all the predictor variables were included in the functions based on the greatest univariate discriminant coefficient [Table 5]. Before the formula was calculated with the greatest univariate discriminant coefficient, the predictor variables were subjected to a test of significance using Wilks' lambda. It was found that the entire assigned predictor variables showed statistical significance at P < 0.05 [Table 3].
Table 5: Group centroid for both the sex using unstandardized canonical discriminant functions

Click here to view


The best discriminant function was



Expansion of abbreviation:−

DFS: Discriminant function score

Man. I1MW: Mandibular first intermolar width

Max. ICW: Maxillary intercanine width

From the step-wise discriminant analysis, the group centroid was also generated for both the sexes. A group centroid is the mean discriminant score for each sex. A cutoff point, which separates one sex from the other, is the average of the two centroids; a smaller value than this is considered as a female and vice versa. The cutoff point between the sexes was −0.0385. The male group centroid was 0.208 and the female group centroid was −0.285 [Table 6]. Raw coefficients, the discriminant function coefficients, were used to calculate the discriminant score.
Table 6: Classification accuracy checked using cross-validation for the developed discriminant function

Click here to view


The value obtained using discriminant function for the casts of males and females is calculated, respectively. Hence, it shows that this discriminant function formula can accurately identify sexual dimorphism in this population. To assess whether it is possible to generate accurate sex models from the data collected for this study, discriminant functions were calculated and tested using cross-validation. This was performed using SPSS software and the leave-one-out method was chosen to calculate the cross-validation error rate [Table 6].

The discriminant function used in the present study describes the optimal separation between the sexes and also shows that there are significant variations between them, and it is substantiated by classification accuracy of functions provided in [Table 6]. Hence, the original grouped cases correctly classified were 85.75%.


   Discussion Top


Sexual dimorphism in the arch width of deciduous dentition varies population to population and hence the criteria set for one population may not be applicable to another. Considering the fact that there are differences in arch width parameter of deciduous dentition in specific populations, even within the same population in the historical and evolutional perspective, it is necessary to determine precise population values in order to make identification possible on the basis of dental measurements. These values can be of use as an adjunct in determining sex in specific cases: in individuals as well as in groups (mass disasters, archeological sites, etc.,).[26]

The coronal morphology and dimension of a deciduous dentition remain unchanged during growth and development except for specific conditions such as nutritional abnormality, inherited disorders and other pathological conditions. Hence, arch width of deciduous dentition can be used in determining the sex after the tooth has erupted even in child skeletons or samples whose skeletal features are not defined.

The study of dental stone models has been in use in forensic odontology for a very long time. The accessibility to measure various dimensions using geometric devices is simpler and easier using dental stone models rather than direct intraoral measurements. Dental stone models serve a greater purpose for the intra-arch measurements in particular. This is a maiden study in using the maxillary intra-arch measurements in deciduous dentition for sex determination using discriminant function analysis.

In the present study, it has been identified that significant sex differences exist in arch width parameter in the upper jaw. It was also found that these differences were large enough to determine the sex with classification accuracy between 89.7% and 77% from cross-validation of discriminant function analysis for male and female, respectively, when using all the parameters explained in the methodology.

In the present study, the equation developed by this study ranges in accuracy from 89.7% and 77%. This cannot be directly compared for sex determination among pediatric population because no study is conducted using arch width using discriminant function analysis. This was considerably higher when compared to that developed by Black,[22] De Vito and Saunders [23] and Zadzińska et al.[24] with 33.3%–75%, 35.7%–45.9% and 38.5%–73.3%, respectively, and similar to the study conducted by Shankar et al.,[25] but all these studies used odontometric parameters for sex determination.

This shows that the present study provides robust evidence to identify the sex in a pediatric population using its formula. Such population variations may result from differences in the quality of environment during growth and development, particularly maternal health, which may influence tooth size.


   Conclusion Top


The present study elicits the fact that the level of sexual dimorphism in deciduous maxillary arch width dimensions of an Indian population is sufficiently large enough for determining sex to an accuracy of 89.7% and 77% from discriminant function analysis using all variables. Hence, the discriminant function derived would help in sex determination in a pediatric population of South Indian origin by substituting the arch width values in the function and referring it to the cutoff point which discriminates the sex.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Murali Sundararajulu (Life member of Indian Association of Forensic Odontology), Mrs. Meenamurali and Mrs. S Kokilambal for their immense support toward the research work.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Seno M, Ishizu H. Sex identification of a human tooth. Int J Forensic Dent 1973;1:8-11.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Astete JC. Sexual dimorphism in the tooth dimensions of Spanish and Chilean peoples. Int J Odontostomat 2009;3:47-50.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Camps FE. Gradwohl's Legal Medicine. 3rd ed. Australia: Wright and Son, Bristol John; 1976.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Taylor RM. Variation in Morphology of Teeth: Anthropologic and Forensic Aspects. Springfield, Illinois: USA; 1978.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jensen E, Kai-Jen Yen P, Moorrees CF, Thomsen SO. Mesiodistal crown diameters of the deciduous and permanent teeth in individuals. J Dent Res 1957;36:39-47.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Stroud JL, Buschang PH, Goaz PW. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dentin and enamel thickness. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:169-71.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hillson SW. Dental Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Schwartz GT, Dean MC. Sexual dimorphism in modern human permanent teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005;128:312-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ditch LE, Rose JC. A multivariate dental sexing technique. Am J Phys Anthropol 1972;37:61-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Margetts B, Brown T. Crown diameters of the deciduous teeth in Australian aboriginals. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;48:493-502.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lysell L, Myrberg N. Mesiodistal tooth size in the deciduous and permanent dentitions. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:113-22.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Axelsson G, Kirveskari P. Crown size of deciduous teeth in Icelanders. Acta Odontol Scand 1984;42:339-43.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Farmer V, Townsend G. Crown size variability in the deciduous dentition of South Australian children. Am J Hum Biol 1993;5:681-90.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kuswandari S, Nishino M. The mesiodistal crown diameters of primary dentition in Indonesian Javanese children. Arch Oral Biol 2004;49:217-22.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Harris EF, Lease LR. Mesiodistal tooth crown dimensions of the primary dentition: A worldwide survey. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005;128:593-607.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Clinch LM. A longitudinal study of the mediodistal crown diameters of the deciduous teeth and their permanent successors. Eur J Orthod 2007;29 Suppl 1:i75-81.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Jonathan Daniel M, Khatri M, Srinivasan SV, Jimsha VK, Marak F. Comparison of inter-canine and inter-molar width as an aid in gender determination: A preliminary study. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2014;36:168-72.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Venkat Rao G, Kiran G. Sex determination by means of inter-canine and inter-molar width- a study in Telangana population. Asian Pac J Health Sci 2016;3:171-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Gupta J, Daniel MJ. Crown size and arch width dimension as an indicator in gender determination for a Puducherry population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8:120-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
20.
Fernandes LC, Veloso CV, Oliveira JA, Genu PR, Santiago BM, Rabello PM. Odontometric analysis of molars for sex determination. Braz J Oral Sci 2016;15:35-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Vodanoic M, Demo Z, Njemirovskij V. Odontometrics: A useful method for sex determination in an archeological skeletal population? J Archeol Sci 2007;34:905-13.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Black TK 3rd. Sexual dimorphism in the tooth-crown diameters of the deciduous teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;48:77-82.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
De Vito C, Saunders SR. A discriminant function analysis of deciduous teeth to determine sex. J Forensic Sci 1990;35:845-58.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Zadzińska E, Karasińska M, Jedrychowska-Dańska K, Watala C, Witas HW. Sex diagnosis of subadult specimens from medieval polish archaeological sites: Metric analysis of deciduous dentition. Homo 2008;59:175-87.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Shankar S, Anuthama K, Kruthika M, Kumar VS, Ramesh K, Jaheerdeen A, et al. Identifying sexual dimorphism in a paediatric South Indian population using stepwise discriminant function analysis. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20:752-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Işcan MY, Kedici PS. Sexual variation in bucco-lingual dimensions in Turkish dentition. Forensic Sci Int 2003;137:160-4.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Teschler-Nicola M, Prossinger H. Sex determination using tooth dimensions. In: Alt KW, Rosing FW, Teschler-Nicola M, editors. Dental Anthropology, Fundamentals, Limits and Prospects. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1998. p. 479-501.  Back to cited text no. 27
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,300 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed167    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007