Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ONLINE ONLY ARTICLES - ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 308
 

Assessment of epithelial–mesenchymal transition signatures in oral submucous fibrosis


1 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, The Oxford Dental College and Hospital, Bommanahalli, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Radiology, Raja Rajeswari Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, The Oxford Dental College and Hospital, Bommanahalli, Karnataka, India
4 Sri Krishna Sevashrama Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission24-Jul-2018
Date of Acceptance09-Mar-2019
Date of Web Publication20-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
R Shesha Prasad
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, The Oxford Dental College and Hospital, Bommanahalli, Bengaluru - 560 068, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_177_18

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: Recently, the concept of field cancerization has questioned the accuracy of biopsy site selection clinically. Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) has a global malignant transformation rate of 7.6% despite having less dysplastic changes clinically or histologically. Hence, this study was undertaken to evaluate the expression of vimentin, epithelial-cadherin (E-Cad) and collagen IV in OSMF, using immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty- five patients with OSMF (61), with habits and no OSMF (61) and patients without habit and OSMF (63) were subjected to biopsy for sample collection. The samples were analyzed immunohistochemically for vimentin, E-Cad and collagen IV. The PCR values for vimentin and E-Cad were also done.
Results: Vimentin expression was increased in OSMF patients, whereas E-Cad expression was decreased in OSMF patients.
Conclusion: Epithelial–mesenchymal transition signatures are definitely positive in OSMF cases.


Keywords: Collagen-IV, epithelial-cadherin, epithelial–mesenchymal transition markers, immunohistochemistry, oral submucous fibrosis, vimentin


How to cite this article:
Prasad R S, Pai A, Shyamala K, Bhadranna A, Shenoy S, Yaji A. Assessment of epithelial–mesenchymal transition signatures in oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019;23:308

How to cite this URL:
Prasad R S, Pai A, Shyamala K, Bhadranna A, Shenoy S, Yaji A. Assessment of epithelial–mesenchymal transition signatures in oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 18];23:308. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2019/23/2/308/264805





   Introduction Top


The concept of most invasive oral cancers arising from potentially malignant lesions such as leukoplakia, erythroplakia and oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is well accepted. Studies have found that over 5 million people are affected by oral cancers in India alone (0.5% of the Indian population).[1] A plethora of studies have been taken up for the early detection of oral cancer due to the limited ability of the current clinical/histological methods to predict high-risk precursor lesions for the conversion of malignant transformation and lack of adequate early predictive markers. With the recent advances in technology, focus is shifted from clinical to biological behavior and underlined molecular events to get better outcomes in detecting, treating and preventing the disease.[2] The concept of field cancerization further questions the validity of biopsy reports which is always debatable, as a seemingly normal tissue can have genetic changes which can eventually turnout to be malignant particular part of the tissue because a seemingly normal tissue can also have genetic changes which can eventually turn out to be malignant in future.[3]

The gold standard for the diagnosis of lesions ranging from PMDs to full-blown cancers is biopsy. The prognosis and treatment are based on the degrees of dysplasia and other histopathological changes seen in biopsy samples. Numerous studies emphasize on early genetic changes that eventually transform into malignancy without any clue, which is too early to be detected histopathologically.

Considering this, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers such as vimentin, E-Cad and collagen IV can be diagnostic in the early changes which cannot be detected from the biopsy. It is well known that frank dysplastic changes are seldom seen in OSMF, but yet considered to have a malignant potential of 7.6% globally.[4]

Epithelial-cadherin (E-Cad) expression is an important parameter in assessing the morphology and homeostasis of epithelial tissues. Loss of epithelial integrity is related to the lower expression of E-Cad which is an EMT marker.[5] Apart from E-Cad, connective tissue EMT markers such as vimentin are also involved in the morphology and regulation of cell behavior.[6] Recently, the hallmark EMT signatures with low E-Cad and high vimentin have shown greater metastasis in primary head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. Basement membrane (BM) integrity is often questioned in the process of carcinogenesis. Several degrees of discontinuity are noted in invasive carcinomas. Immunostaining for BM proteins such as collagen IV can reveal BM discontinuity.[7]

Considering the above facts, this study was undertaken to evaluate the expression of vimentin, E-Cad and collagen IV using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in OSMF.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was conducted in the outpatient department of Oxford Dental College with institutional ethical clearance. One hundred and eighty-five sample size were selected, wherein 63 were normal healthy patients without any habits, 61 patients were considered with a habit history (chewing gutkha and other forms of areca nut) without OSMF and the other 61 patients had a habit history with OSMF. Patients clinically diagnosed as OSMF and healthy controls with or without habits that consented to participate in the study were included in the study. Patients with systemic disorders which will contraindicate biopsy and extraction were excluded from the study.

After initial screening, patients' tissue samples were collected and stored in formalin for transportation. Tissues were dehydrated with a graded concentration of isopropyl alcohol and xylene. They were embedded in wax blocks and cut into 4-μ thin sections, transferred onto the slide and stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain. To identify epithelium and connective tissue on the slide and the tissue block, initially, a slide was observed under a compound microscope followed by naked eye. Later, the slides were overlapped on the tissue block to identify the epithelium and the connective tissue part. The previous microscopic image of epithelium and connective tissue was kept as reference and markings were done. After making the notches on the block, the block was mounted onto the soft-tissue microtome, and the ribbon tissues produced were picked up and run over a water bath.

On the water bath, using a forceps, the tissue was separated at the “line of separation” created by the notches made on the tissue block. Finally, the tissue was divided into epithelial part and connective tissue part, and the separated tissue bits were transferred into labeled bullets for molecular analysis.

  • Preparation of Aminopropyl triethoxysilane-coated slides – Before coating the glass slides with silane, they were subjected to pretreatment to enhance adherence to the tissue. Glass slides were washed well and rinsed for 2 h in Laxbro-soap solution, scrubbed well with a brush to remove the grease from the slides and then washed well again. The slides were then soaked in 1/10 N hydrochloric acid overnight. The slides were subjected to a thorough wash in autoclaved distilled water the next day and incubated at 56°C–60°C in an incubator overnight
  • The slides so pretreated were then coated with silane for adhesion of the tissues as follows: Glass slides were first dipped in acetone for 3 min and then in 2% silane, i.e., 2 ml of 3 aminopropyl triethoxysilane solution in 98 ml of acetone for 5 min and then the slides were dipped in distilled water and dried using hot air oven at 55°C–60°C for 48 h. Then, the slides were stored in refrigerator till use.


Preparation of wash buffer

Tris-buffer-silane (TBS) used in this study was prepared by adding 6.6 g of Tris buffer to 1 L of distilled water and then the pH was adjusted to 7.4–7.6 by adding hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. The pH range was checked using a digital pH meter.

Preparation of citrate buffer for antigen retrieval

2.94 g of sodium citrate was added to 1 L of distilled water and the pH was adjusted to 6.0–6.4 by adding hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide solution. The pH range was checked using a digital pH meter. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of OSMF were stained by hematoxylin and eosin, and the serial sections of the same were stained by immunohistochemical reagents. All the antibodies in the procedure were incubated at room temperature, in a moist chamber.

Immunohistochemistry procedure for vimentin, E-Cad and collagen IV

The sections of 4 μm thickness were cut and mounted on the 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-coated glass slides. The slides were incubated at 55°C–60°C overnight before the day of staining. The sections were deparaffinized in two changes of xylene for 5 min each, and then the slides were hydrated through different grades of iso-propyl alcohol (100%, 50% for 3 min each) and brought to distilled water.

The tissues were then incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide block for 5–10 min in room temperature to block the endogenous peroxidase activity. The tissues were then washed in TBS for 5 min and subjected to antigen retrieval. The slides were then antigen retrieved using a solution of sodium citrate buffer in a microwave oven for three cycles of 800 W for 6 min, 800 W for 4 min and 200 W for 14 min and then allowed to cool back to room temperature; the sections were subjected to two washes of TBS.

The sections were then incubated with a protein block to eliminate background staining. The sections so treated were then incubated with primary antibody for 60 min. The slides were then washed with TBS twice for 5 min each. Subsequently, they were incubated with BIOGENEX SS Polymer for 30 min. The slides were then washed as before in TBS and incubated with fresh DAB chromogen for 4–5 min. DAB chromogen was prepared by adding DAB to the buffer at the ratio of 1:2. The slides were then washed in water to stop the chromogen reaction and remove the excess DAB and counterstained with hematoxylin provided in the kit for 1 min. The slides were then dehydrated through iso-propyl alcohol, cleared using xylene and mounted with DPX. Similarly, E-Cad and collagen IV were assessed using appropriate primary and secondary antibody kits. Dako IHC kit for vimentin and E-Cad and Biogenx kit for collagen IV were used.

Evaluation of staining for e-cadherin, vimentin and collagen IV markers

The criteria used to define E-Cad-positive cells were brown staining in cell membrane of epithelial cells; for vimentin, brown staining in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells and for collagen IV, brown staining along the BM [[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], respectively].
Figure 1: Epithelial cadherin-negative expression in oral submucous fibrosis cases

Click here to view
Figure 2: High expression of vimentin in epithelium

Click here to view
Figure 3: Mild expression of collagen IV in oral submucous fibrosis

Click here to view


The percentage of positively stained cells was scored as well as staining intensity was assessed in comparison with the positive control tissue and scored accordingly [Table 1].
Table 1: Scoring for percentage of positive cells and intensity of cell staining

Click here to view


Qualitative analysis is made by intensity of staining and quantitative analysis is made by percentage of cells stained; hence, both are considered.

Polymerase chain reaction for epithelial tissue-specific expression of E-cadherin and vimentin

Samples of 40 μm-sized shavings of paraffin-embedded epithelial tissue were provided after separating the connective tissue and epithelial tissue, for tissue-specific E-Cad and vimentin expression by real-time PCR. Tissue sections were deparaffinized with 500 μl 100% xylene under a fume hood. Then, contents were vortexed for 1 min and left in a 65°C water bath for 15 min. The xylene solvent was decanted immediately, and the procedure was repeated two more times to remove the wax content completely. After this to remove the residual xylene, the samples were washed five times with ethanol first by adding 1 ml of absolute ethanol and mixed by vortex for 10 s and removed after 10 min. Then, 1 ml of absolute ethanol was added and mixed by vortex for 10 s and removed after 30 min. Later, the ethanol concentration was gradually decreased by adding 1 ml of 90% ethanol and mixed by vortex for 10 s and after 20 min, the tube was centrifuged at 8000 rpm and then ethanol was removed out. This was followed by adding 1 ml of 70% ethanol, mixed by vortex for 10 s and after 20 min, the tube was centrifuged at 8000 rpm and then ethanol was removed out. Finally, 1 ml of 50% ethanol was added and mixed by vortex for 10 s and after 20 min, the tube was centrifuged at 8000 rpm and then ethanol was removed out.

The microtubes were then left in a 40°C oven to dry the tissues and to evaporate the residual ethanol. After the tissues were dried, 500 μl lysis solution was added to each microtube (40 mM Tris, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.5% Tween 20, 0.5 μg/μl proteinase k, pH, 8); the proteinase k was added after pH adjustment and the microtubes were left in a 60°C water bath and were inverted every 30 min until the tissue was completely lysed (temperatures over 60°C will inactivate the enzyme rapidly). Then, the resulting cell lysate was heated at 95°C for 8 min to inactivate the proteinase k.

For the DNA extraction from cell lysate, phenolchloroform was used as follows: An equal volume of trissaturated phenol (pH, 8) was added and the tubes were left on a rotating wheel for 10 min and then centrifuged at 12,000 for 2 min. Then, 300 μl of the upper phase was transferred to a new microtube and an equal volume of phenol: chloroform mixture (1:1) the tube contents were mixed on the rotating wheel for 10 min and were centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 2 min. The upper phase was transferred to a new microtube and 2.5 μl of cold absolute ethanol was added. For DNA precipitation, the microtube was left overnight at 20°C. Then, tubes were centrifuged for 30 min at 4 and ethanol was decanted. The DNA pellet was gently washed two times with cold 70% ethanol and then the pellet was dried completely at room temperature. The pellet was dissolved in 30–70 μl of sterile distilled water, depending on the size. To complete the solubilization, the microtubes were put in 40°C water bath for 1 h. To check the extracted DNA, 5 μl of the solution was run on a 1% agarose gel.

Agarose gel electrophoresis

0.8 g of agarose powder was measured and added to a 250-ml conical flask. To the flask, 100 ml TAE (1x) buffer was added and mixed properly. The agarose was melted in a microwave oven or hot water bath until the solution became clear. The solution was allowed to cool to about 50°C–55°C with swirling of the flask occasionally to cool evenly. 1–2 μl of ethidium bromide solution was added to the melted agarose gel and mixed well. Ends of the casting tray were sealed and combs were placed. Molten agarose solution was poured into the casting tray without forming air bubbles and let to cool until it attained solid state. The combs were carefully pulled out, the tape was removed and the gel was placed in the electrophoresis chamber. Sufficient amount of 1x TAE buffer was added so that there is about 2–3 mm of buffer over the gel. 6 μl of 6x sample loading buffer was added to each 25 μl of the DNA sample. Each sample/DNA ladder was carefully pipetted into separate wells in the gel. Electrode wires were connected to the power supply, making sure that the positive (red) and negative (black) are connected correctly. Power supply was turned on to about 100 V (should not exceed 5 V/cm between electrodes). After sufficient run, the power pack was turned off, and the gel was removed by using gloves. The DNA in the gel was visualized with ultraviolet (UV) light, photographed and documented using UV trans-illuminator.

No band of DNA was present in the samples isolated. As there was no band detected in the gel, the DNA was quantified using spectrophotometer, and all the samples had no nucleic acid detected. This could be because of the smaller size of the samples. As there are wax removing steps and further purification steps, the concentration of DNA would have reduced to detect in the PCR. Further, PCR done for Ecad and vimentin along with human actin PCR did not yield an expected amplification. This confirmed the lack of required concentration of DNA for the primers to probe the complementary region in the DNA.

Later, 50-μm tissue shavings from the paraffin blocks were used for DNA isolation as per the above mentioned method. The isolated DNA was checked on the agarose gel, and the presence of DNA was detected for the samples [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Gel image showing the DNA bands from the tissue shavings

Click here to view


Primer designing

The primers for E-Cad and vimentin were designed using Primer Express software, synthesized and purified by high-performance liquid chromatography for real-time PCR purpose.

  • E-Cad forward: 5′-TGC CCA GAA AAT GAA AAA GG-3′
  • Reverse: 5′-GTG TAT GTG GCA ATG CGT TC-3′
  • Vimentin forward: 5′-AAA GCG TGG CTG CCA AGA AC-3′
  • Reverse: 5′-GTG ACT GCA CCT GTC TCC GGT A-3′.


The primers were validated for the samples, and it was observed that, when PCR was performed with two randomly picked samples, both the primers yielded the expected band, i.e., 240 bp as shown in [Figure 4].

Real-time PCR (RT-PCR quantification) was performed in Applied Biosystems StepOne Real Time PCR (Foster City, CA, USA). All reaction components were procured from Life Technologies, USA. Standard reaction volume 10 μl contains 1x SYBR Green master mix, 50 ng DNA template and 100 nM of oligonucleotide primer. The initial step of RT-PCR was 2 min hold at 95°C. Cycles (n = 40) consisted of a 10 s melt at 95°C, followed by a 30 s annealing and extension at 60°C. All reactions were performed in duplicates against a serially diluted standard. PCR amplicons of E-Cad and vimentin were cloned into the plasmid and used as a standard for the quantification of the sample. Threshold cycle (Ct) analysis of all samples was either set at 0.5 relative fluorescence units or left to automatic detection by the system.

Absolute quantification analysis

A standard curve with the highest R2 value was constructed based on the values generated by the quantitative PCR, and the quantity of E-Cad and Vimentin in each sample was calculated against the standard values.

Using the above criteria, intensity of staining and percentage of cells stained were calculated by a single observer.


   Results Top


Males dominated the three study groups compared to females. The mean age of the study population in each group was comparable and was in the third decade [Table 2].
Table 2: Age and Gender comparison between different groups

Click here to view


The percentage of positive vimentin cells between 11% and 50% was maximum in OSMF group (72.1%) as compared to other groups. OSMF group was the only group to have 1.6% of cells above 50%. When compared with other two groups, these were statistically significant. OSMF cases had maximum intensity of 39.3% in moderate group, followed by 16.4% in strong group and 1.6% in very strong group which was higher intensity compared to other groups. Maximum number of negative staining was seen in normal cases. Weak staining was maximum in cases with a habit of chewing gutkha and other forms of areca nut. Intergroup comparison showed statistical significance [Table 3].
Table 3: Comparison of percentage of positive cells and level of intensity for vimentin, E cadherin and collagen IV between the three groups using Chi-square test

Click here to view


OSMF group showed marked reduction in E-Cad levels with 68.9% below or equal to 10% of positive cells as compared to other groups. Normal cases (healthy) showed 61.9% in 51%–81% category. Group with a habit history also showed marked reduction in E-Cad levels, with 72.1% at below or equal to 10% of positive cell category [Table 3].

Collagen IV analysis showed OSMF group had maximum cases in negative (19.7%) and ≤10% (68.9%) category followed by the habit cases (39.3% in ≤10% category). Normal cases showed maximum of 68.3% positive cells in 51%–80% category. Intergroup results were statistically significant. The above results indicate a very early event in breach of the BM depicted by collagen IV in OSMF group followed by habit group [Table 3].

PCR values for percentage of positive cells stained for vimentin were statistically significant in OSMF group. This implied that PCR values corresponded to the aberrant vimentin expression in OSMF [Table 4]. However, the intensity of staining and PCR values were not statistically significant in all the three groups. No statistically significant results were seen in comparison of PCR values and intensity and the number of positive cells stained for E-Cad in all the three groups.
Table 4: Comparison of mean polymerase chain reaction values between percentage of positively stained cells and for vimentin and E-cadherin using Kruskal-Wallis test

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Being a member of the classical cadherins, E-Cad is a large single-pass transmembrane glycoprotein (120 kDa) involved in calcium-dependent cell–cell adhesion.[8],[9] CDH1 which is located at chromosome 16q22.1 encodes E-cad whose tail end is associated with many different cytoplasmic proteins. These proteins are mainly composed of the a-, b- and p120-catenins.[9]

Different E-Cad-binding partners mediate and regulate the activity of E-Cad, particularly its association with the actin–myosin cytoskeleton, its transport and recycling and interactions with the epithelial cells. The cadherin switch plays an important role in cancer propagation.[9]

In OSMF, changes in oral epithelium and BM thickness with numerous alterations in molecular level are noted. E-Cad is considered an indicator of EMT induction in OSMF. Increased expressions of p-63 gene and its oncogenic isoform 1 with reduction in E-Cad levels and beta catenin levels are seen in OSMF.[10]

Vimentin, a type III intermediate filament protein, is another EMT marker involved in a number of diseases and conditions, including cancer, inflammation and congenital cataracts.[11] It is predominantly expressed in mesenchymal, many undifferentiated and cultured cells and also associated with the metastasis of cancer.[12],[13],[14]

The role of vimentin is increasingly recognized in carcinogenesis and is seen to be upregulated in many invasive cancers. Vimentin might play a key role in EMT associated with stress or pathological situations.[12]

Aberrant vimentin expression of oral dysplastic and fibrotic tissues such as OSMF has been reported in literature. In addition, vimentin has shown a significant correlation with aggressive phenotype and survival of the OSCC patients.[12]

Loss of E-Cad and gain of vimentin could be used as important EMT markers in the progression of carcinoma in situ to microinvasive or invasive squamous cell carcinoma.[13] Hence, the expression of E-Cad and vimentin using PCR in OSMF cases was considered in our current research.

Sawant et al. studied 71 samples of OSMF using IHC and reported aberrant vimentin expression in the epithelial cells to be suggestive of EMT. They also observed 227 cancer cases which showed positive EMT.[15] An IHC study conducted on 100 biopsy samples of normal, dysplastic and squamous cell carcinoma cases by Chaw et al. revealed decreased E-Cad expression but increased vimentin expression that correlated with increased disease severity.[16]

Fernández et al. reported downregulation of E-Cad in dysplastic cells by evaluating the expression of E-Cad, vimentin, CD31 and CD117 in 16 oral epithelial dysplasia, 19 oral squamous cell carcinoma and 16 normal mucosa samples. In addition, epithelial cells expressed vimentin which is a mesenchymal marker.[17] Our IHC observations showed similar vimentin and E-Cad expressions.

Our study results showed that percentage of cells stained for vimentin was maximum in OSMF group followed by habit group. PCR values for vimentin were highest in OSMF group. The expression of E-Cad was less in OSMF group when compared to habit group.

Tosios et al. conducted an IHC study using mouse monoclonal antibodies for analyzing laminin and collagen IV in 30 dysplastic tissue (leukoplakia) and 50 invasive squamous cell carcinoma tissue specimens. The study revealed alterations in the distribution of laminin and type IV collagen indicating the loss of continuity of the subepithelial BM which in turn implies the neoplastic transformation process in oral epithelium.[18] Agarwal et al. evaluated the expression of type IV collagen in three histological grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma in comparison with that in normal oral mucosa.[19] IHC using monoclonal mouse antibodies noted discontinuity of BM in squamous cell carcinoma. Normal mucosa showed no breach in the BM. OSMF and habit groups in the present study showed discontinuity of BM.


   Conclusion Top


This observational study suggests that EMT signatures are definitely positive in OSMF cases. Surprisingly, habit cases also showed positive EMT signatures even before the manifestation of any disease. These signatures occur even before dysplastic changes are evident histopathologically. Exposure to the habit of areca nut chewing may initiate EMT signatures long before clinical manifestations irrespective of the duration or frequency of the habit. Hence, this study gives valuable inputs for initial changes instigating disease process before classic clinical or histopathologic changes.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Arakeri G, Brennan PA. Oral submucous fibrosis: An overview of the aetiology, pathogenesis, classification, and principles of management. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:587-93.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sawant SS, Vaidya MM, Chaukar DA, Alam H, Dmello C, Gangadaran P, et al. Clinical significance of aberrant vimentin expression in oral premalignant lesions and carcinomas. Oral Dis 2014;20:453-65.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Nayyar AS. Novel biochemical markers: Early detection and prevention of malignant transformation a pilot study. Acta Med Iran 2012;50:597-602.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Arakeri G, Patil SG, Aljabab AS, Lin KC, Merkx MA, Gao S, et al. Oral submucous fibrosis: An update on pathophysiology of malignant transformation. J Oral Pathol Med 2017;46:413-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wong TS, Gao W, Chan JY. Interactions between E-cadherin and microRNA deregulation in head and neck cancers: The potential interplay. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:126038.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014;15:178-96.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pinto GA, Vassallo J, Andrade LA, Magna LA. Immunohistochemical study of basement membrane collagen IV in uterine cervix carcinoma. Sao Paulo Med J 1998;116:1846-51.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ren X, Wang J, Lin X, Wang X. E-cadherin expression and prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Evidence from 19 published investigations. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:2447-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Coopman P, Djiane A. Adherens junction and E-cadherin complex regulation by epithelial polarity. Cell Mol Life Sci 2016;73:3535-53.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ekanayaka RP, Tilakaratne WM. Oral submucous fibrosis: Review on mechanisms of malignant transformation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;122:192-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Chan SW, Kallarakkal TG, Abraham MT. Changed expression of E-cadherin and galectin-9 in oral squamous cell carcinomas but lack of potential as prognostic markers. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:2145-52.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dmello C, Sawant S, Alam H, Gangadaran P, Tiwari R, Dongre H, et al. Vimentin-mediated regulation of cell motility through modulation of beta4 integrin protein levels in oral tumor derived cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2016;70:161-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Akhtar K, Ara A, Siddiqui SA, Sherwani RK. Transition of immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin and vimentin from premalignant to malignant lesions of oral cavity and oropharynx. Oman Med J 2016;31:165-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ridge KM, Shumaker D, Robert A, Hookway C, Gelfand VI, Janmey PA, et al. Methods for determining the cellular functions of vimentin intermediate filaments. Methods Enzymol 2016;568:389-426.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sawant SS, Vaidya MM, Chaukar DA, Alam H, Dmello C, Gangadaran P, et al. Clinical significance of aberrant vimentin expression in oral premalignant lesions and carcinomas. Oral Dis 2014;20:453-65.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Chaw SY, Abdul Majeed A, Dalley AJ, Chan A, Stein S, Farah CS, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) biomarkers – E-cadherin, beta-catenin, APC and vimentin – In oral squamous cell carcinogenesis and transformation. Oral Oncol 2012;48:997-1006.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Fernández A, Marshall M, Santibañez N, Martínez C, Fernández J. Comparing the immuno-expression of endothelial markers in normal oral mucosa, oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma: Relationship between E-cadherin, vimentin, CD31, CD117 and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. MOJ Anat Physiol 2017;4:00135.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tosios KI, Kapranos N, Papanicolaou SI. Loss of basement membrane components laminin and type IV collagen parallels the progression of oral epithelial neoplasia. Histopathology 1998;33:261-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Agarwal P, Ballabh R. Expression of type IV collagen in different histological grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma: An immunohistochemical study. J Cancer Res Ther 2013;9:272-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,189 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed90    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded13    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007