Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 243-247
 

Ex vivo culture of oral keratinocytes using direct explant cell culture technique


1 Department of Oral Pathology, Maratha Mandal's N G Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Oral Pathology, Chaitanya Dental Clinic, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral Pathology, Central Research Laboratory, Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
4 Department of Microbiology, Central Research Laboratory, Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
5 Center for Incubation, Innovation, Research and Consultancy, Jyothy Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission24-May-2019
Date of Acceptance02-Jun-2019
Date of Web Publication20-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
H R Shwetha
#156/10, 24th Cross, Kempamma Devi Layout, Hulimavu, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru - 560 076, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_105_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: Culture of cells and tissues is a standard research method practiced in many laboratories. In most of the cases, these cultures are being used as substrates for cell products or as investigative tools for delving the mechanism of gene expression, cell proliferation and transformation. Primary monolayer cell culture has been beneficial to study the general biology of both oral and skin keratinocytes. There are two different techniques of primary cell cultures followed, which include direct explant and enzymatic techniques.
Aims: The aim of the study was to optimize the culture of keratinocytes obtained from patients with normal oral mucosa by direct explant technique.
Materials and Methods: Keratinocytes were isolated from 15 patients and were cultured in vitro and observed under an inverted microscope. The cultured cells were characterized by immunocytochemistry method using pan-cytokeratin.
Results: The total success rate of primary culture of the oral epithelial cells by direct explant technique was 88.6%. No contamination of microorganisms in the primary cell cultures was obtained.
Conclusion: Within the limited numbers of samples used in the current pilot study, we conclude that the direct explant technique appears to be a simple and successful technique for the isolation of oral mucosal keratinocytes if we follow the appropriate protocol.


Keywords: Cell culture, direct explant technique, immunocytochemistry, oral keratinocytes


How to cite this article:
Shwetha H R, Kotrashetti VS, Babu N C, Kumbar V, Bhat K, Reddy R. Ex vivo culture of oral keratinocytes using direct explant cell culture technique. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019;23:243-7

How to cite this URL:
Shwetha H R, Kotrashetti VS, Babu N C, Kumbar V, Bhat K, Reddy R. Ex vivo culture of oral keratinocytes using direct explant cell culture technique. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 18];23:243-7. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2019/23/2/243/264794





   Introduction Top


Cell culture is one of the major tools used in cellular and molecular biology, which provides excellent model systems for studying the normal physiology and biochemistry of cells, the effects of drugs and toxic compounds on the cells, mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Primary culture refers to the stage of the culture after the cells are being isolated from the tissue and have been proliferated under the appropriate conditions until they reach adequate confluence. It is used for drug screening and development and for large-scale manufacturing of biological compounds such as vaccines, therapeutic proteins, tissue/organ replacement and stem cell therapy.[1],[2]

The oral mucosa which is produced ex vivo has the ability to provide oral tissues that have similar characteristics of the original mucosa composed of an epithelial or dermal component. Most of the attention developed in recent years on kinetics of stem cell regeneration, mechanisms of differentiation and neoplasia has been focusing on the epithelial cells. Apart from this, cell culture of the oral and dermal keratinocytes has gained popularity in oral and maxillofacial surgery due to loss of epithelial structure found in thermal or chemical burns, trauma, penetrating gunshot injuries or ablative cancer surgery in the maxillofacial region.[3],[4] Cells can be isolated from tissues for ex vivo culture by either purification from the blood (blood cells), released from soft tissue by enzymatic digestion (mononuclear cells) or explant culture.[5] Primary cells generally have limited lifespan in culture, known as the Hayflick limit, after which they stop dividing yet remain metabolically active, a phenomenon known as senescence.[6]

The first technique of culturing oral epithelial cells in vitro using 3T3 mouse fibroblasts as a feeder layer was proposed by Rheinwald and Green in 1975.[7] Although this method made it possible to grow keratinocytes with superior yield, these cultured sheets of oral mucosa with an irradiated feeder cell layer had the risk of introducing high mouse DNA content onto proliferating human cells.[8],[9] This procedure was later modified by Kitano and Okada, who later introduced dispase to separate the epithelial sheet from the underlying dermis of the skin.[10] Boyce and Ham introduced a serum-free medium for the culture of primary keratinocyte, where the 3T3 feeder layer was no longer needed for the growth of keratinocytes, and it has benefits for use in clinical applications.[11]

Two techniques have been used to cultivate the oral keratinocytes from tissues for ex vivo cultures. Cells can be isolated from solid tissues by digesting the extracellular matrix using enzymes such as trypsin, collagenase or pronase in various concentrations, before agitating the tissue to release the cells into suspension.[12] The other method involves pieces of tissue placed in growth media, and the cells that grow out are available for culture. This method is known as explant culture and appeared to be more successful than the enzymatic technique in culturing human oral keratinocytes.[13],[14] Carrel and Burrows in 1910 described a method for the extraction of epithelial cells called direct explant to culture human gingival and buccal sample.[9] In addition, Klingbeil et al. stated that the direct explant technique obtained the first keratinocytes yield faster than the enzymatic technique.[15] The aim of the present study was to re-evaluate the percentage of success in culturing oral mucosa keratinocytes by direct explant technique.


   Materials and Methods Top


Isolation of primary gingival keratinocytes

The study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. Oral tissue samples were obtained from volunteers undergoing dental surgeries such as implant surgery, third molar extraction and crown lengthening procedures at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department. Primary cell cultures were performed from the keratinized gingival tissues of 10 healthy human subjects (4 males and 11 females aged ranging from 20 to 55 years). Patients were asked to rinse with 10% povidone-iodine solution before collecting the tissue sample. The tissue specimens were later carried to the cell culture laboratory in a 10 ml culture medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium [DMEM/F-12]: Gibco, New York, USA; pH 7.2) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 0.5% amphotericin B (Gibco, New York, USA) to prevent growth of microorganisms. All tissue culture was undertaken inside a laminar flow hood using aseptic technique. The tissue specimens were later washed and disinfected in a 10% povidone-iodine solution for 1 min followed by washing twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and later with culture medium. The tissue specimens were then cut into pieces, approximately 1 mm in size, and placed in the six-well culture plates using a sterile needle of a dental injector. Tissue pieces were left in the culture plate for 45 min to 1 h. The culture media were gently dropped on the tissue pieces placed inside the plates. After 18–20 h, the culture plate was flooded with 5 ml culture media. The culture plate was incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The culture plates were examined daily by an inverted microscope. The old culture medium was replaced with a fresh one twice a week. After the keratinocytes, which were squamous in shape, started to multiply around the tissue sample origin to a diameter of 2–5 mm [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b, the culture medium was changed to keratinocyte serum-free media (defined keratinocyte SFM from Gibco) containing basal media, keratinocyte growth supplement and bovine pituitary extract, 125 μg/ml gentamycin and 1 μg/ml amphotericin B (Gibco, USA) as described by Izumi et al.[3],[16] with a calcium concentration of 0.06 mM. Thus, fibroblast overgrowth was prevented, and fibroblasts were eliminated [Figure 2]. The culture was fed every other day with the culture medium. After about 10 days, when the primary cell culture reached 50%–60% confluence [Figure 3], oral mucosa keratinocytes were harvested with a solution of 0.025% trypsin-ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) at 37°C. After 4–5 min, trypsin-EDTA activity was inhibited with an equal volume of 0.0125% trypsin inhibitor. Disaggregated cells were collected, counted, centrifuged, re-suspended and re-plated into a new different culture plate at a density of 105 cells/ml. The first passage was subcultured to a 24-well culture plate and then later seeded on to the coverslip (HiMedia 12–15 mm, surface coated) kept on another well for the next passages. After the cells got adhered on the coverslip and started proliferating, the coverslip was removed and placed on a slide followed by rinsing briefly with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature for immunocytochemistry analysis of pan-cytokeratin.
Figure 1: (a) Tissue has attached to the plates, and cells have started to disintegrate around the tissue. (b) Cells seen disintegrating from the tissue

Click here to view
Figure 2: Mix population of polygonal- and spindle-shaped cells

Click here to view
Figure 3: Monolayer of keratinocytes

Click here to view


Immunocytochemistry

After fixing the cells with 4% paraformaldehyde on coverslip, the cells were washed twice with PBS solution. Cells were incubated with peroxidase block for 10 min followed by rinsing with deionized water and then with PBS. The antigen retrieval buffer (100 mM Tris, 5% urea, pH 9.5) was preheated to 95°C for 3 min. The coverslip with cells was placed in the antigen retrieval buffer in the staining jar and heat for 10 min at 95°C. Remove the solution and rinse the coverslip thrice with PBS. Application of power block was done for 5–10 min to minimize nonspecific binding. Prediluted cocktail primary antibody of pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3 from Biocare) was added for 1 h and rinsed with PBS. The tissue was later covered with a super-enhancer reagent for 20 min and rinsed with PBS. Polymer HRP reagent was added for 30 min and then rinsed with PBS. 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) substrate solution was added for 10 min and rinsed well with deionized water. Counterstaining was done using Mayer's hematoxylin for 10 min, and the side was rinsed gently under tap water, immersed in ammonia water for 10 s and then rinsed with tap water.[17]


   Results Top


The results showed that none of the primary culture of oral epithelial cells by direct explant technique failed, and the total success rate was 88.6%. Tissue samples of a size approximately 1 mm × 1 mm were found to adhere and grow faster than those tissues larger than 1 mm × 1 mm. The average days required for the epithelial cells to grow and migrate from the tissue was 5–7 days and to reach 50% confluency was 12–15 days. In this study, few wells with contamination of microorganisms in the primary cell cultures were observed. Morphology of the cells initially was round to polygonal and few cells with spindle shaped. Once the media were changed to keratinocyte growth media, cells appeared polygonal and formed a monolayer of sheet of cells. The structure of the oral keratinocytes in vitro was the same in primary and subcultures. The age and sex of the subjects did not influence much on the growth of cells during their culture.

Immunocytochemistry showed overall positivity of the cells which had taken up brown staining in the cytoplasm of keratinocytes [Figure 4]a: 40X, 4b: 4X magnification].
Figure 4: (a and b) Keratinocytes showing positivity for pan-cytokeratin antibody (a: 40X, b: 4X magnification)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The literature shows many published studies related to enzymatic and direct explant techniques for keratinocyte cultivation but still uncertainty remains about which one is ideal for obtaining the utmost number of clonogenic cells with good culture life span.[15] Freshney stated that when the tissue sample is limited, the direct explant technique should be opted for cell culture.[18] According to Breidahl et al., the direct explant method is more appropriate to grow more cells in number with good quality and viability.[19] Hence, we chose this method considering patient discomfort in extracting bigger tissue for isolation and growth of oral keratinocytes.

In our study, we could successfully isolate normal oral keratinocytes from the tissue sample. Kedjarune et al.[14] in their study compared both the direct explant technique and the enzymatic method in cultivation of human oral keratinocytes. They observed direct explant technique to be more successful for culturing human oral tissue keratinocytes than the enzymatic method and also found high rate of cell proliferation. They also noted that the direct explant method required only small pieces of samples when compared with the enzymatic method. However, more time was needed to subculture in the direct explant technique. However, these findings were in contrast with the results of the study performed by Klingbeil et al.,[15] who stated that the enzymatic method showed the best results in less time with good life span whereas the tissue size was larger to provide good seeding density. In their study, the average time required for cell growth by direct explant technique was 14.2 and 11.9 days for enzymatic method. In our study, it was 10–12 days for direct explant method where we used 12-well culture plates. This difference may be due to the use of bigger culture flask for culture of keratinocytes by Klingbeil et al. The success rate for the culture technique in our study was similar to Wanichpakorn and Kedjarune-Laggat's study, which was 88.9%, higher than Kedjarune et al.[14] and Reid et al. which was 82% and 80%, respectively.[1],[4],[20] The success rate of the culturing method was defined as the ability of the cells to grow from the original tissue sample, to become 60%–70% confluent and to survive at least until the second passage. The reason behind failure of the culture could be due to the placement of tissue in povidone-iodine for long time, tissue not getting adhered to the culture plate and microbial contamination. We also used rat tail collagen-coating solution from Sigma to enhance the adherence of keratinocytes. No difference was noted in the growth, adherence and subculture of keratinocytes between collagen-coated wells and noncollagen-coated wells.

The age and sex of the subjects who provided the tissue samples did not influence the success rate in the culture, which is consistent with the findings of Reid et al. and Kedjarune et al.[14],[20] However, our results were in contrast with the study done by Lauer,[9] who found that keratinocyte growth and viability were influenced by age as tissue from younger subjects was cultured at the rate of 80% of cases when compared to older subjects with 65% success rates.

The disadvantage of the direct explant technique is that there is requirement of feeder layer when desired cell propagation is needed. Fibroblast overgrowth was also an issue in our study. The use of feeder layer and fibroblast growth was overcome by changing the culture medium from DMEM to keratinocyte growth media. Another issue we had to deal with was microbial contamination from the tissue samples associated with direct explant technique during removal of the tissue from the patient, transportation to the laboratory, tissue processing and media preparation.[5],[13],[20] Wanichpakorn and Kedjarune-Laggat [1] in their article stated that microbial contamination could be correlated with the size of the tissue sample being processed which can affect the success rate of cultivation. In our study, the tissue contaminated was overcome after placing it in a 10% povidone-iodine solution for 1–2 min and adding antibiotics and antimycotics to the media.


   Conclusion Top


The direct explant technique for isolation and culturing of keratinocytes is a simple and easy method with minimum steps. It can be used in the research field which involves cell cultures and isolation from other tissues of the body. The age and sex of the subjects did not influence the growth and viability rate in culturing the oral keratinocytes. However, limitations were reported with contamination by oral flora and fibroblast overgrowth. By taking appropriate measures, both the problems can be resolved. Further research could be helpful to study histological, immunocytochemical characteristics and cell behavior of the cells grown by the direct explant technique.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Wanichpakorn S, Kedjarune-Laggat U. Primary cell culture from human oral tissue: Gingival keratinocytes, gingival fibroblasts and periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 2010;32:327-31.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Handbook of cell culture basics. www.invitrogen.com/cellculturebasics.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Izumi K, Takacs G, Terashi H, Feinberg SE. Ex vivo development of a composite human oral mucosal equivalent. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:571-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Izumi K, Feinberg SE. Skin and oral mucosal substitutes. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2002;14:61-71.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Abbott A. Cell culture: Biology's new dimension. Nature 2003;424:870-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Campisi J, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence: When bad things happen to good cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007;8:729-40.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rheinwald JG, Green H. Formation of a keratinizing epithelium in culture by a cloned cell line derived from a teratoma. Cell 1975;6:317-30.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Raghoebar GM, Tomson AM, Scholma J, Blaauw EH, Witjes MJ, Vissink A. Use of cultured mucosal grafts to cover defects caused by vestibuloplasty: An in vivo study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:872-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Carrel A, Burrows MT Cultivation of adult tissues and organs outside of the body. JAMA 1910;55:1379-81.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kitano Y, Okada N. Separation of the epidermal sheet by dispase. Br J Dermatol 1983;108:555-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Boyce ST, Ham RG. Calcium-regulated differentiation of normal human epidermal keratinocytes in chemically defined clonal culture and serum-free serial culture. J Invest Dermatol 1983;81:33s-40s.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Daniels JT, Kearney JN, Ingham E. Human keratinocyte isolation and cell culture: A survey of current practices in the UK. Burns 1996;22:35-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Bernice MM. Tissue Culture Techniques: An Introduction. Ann. Arbor, MI, U.S.A: Brown-Brumfield, Inc.; 1994. p. 116-24.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kedjarune U, Pongprerachok S, Arpornmaeklong P, Ungkusonmongkhon K. Culturing primary human gingival epithelial cells: Comparison of two isolation techniques. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:224-31.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Klingbeil MF, Herson MR, Cristo EB, dos Santos Pinto D Jr., Yoshito D, Mathor MB. Comparison of two cellular harvesting methods for primary human oral culture of keratinocytes. Cell Tissue Bank 2009;10:197-204.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gurkan RB, Yavuz SA, Aydin G, Pinar E, Meral S. A pilot study of the primary culture of the oral mucosa keratinocytes by the direct explant technique. OHDM 2011;10:88-92.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Calenic B, Ishkitiev N, Yaegaki K, Imai T, Costache M, Tovaru M, et al. Characterization of oral keratinocyte stem cells and prospects of its differentiation to oral epithelial equivalents. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2010;51:641-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Freshney RI. Primary culture. In: Willey-Liss Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Techniques. 5th ed. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Liss; 2005. p. 176-97.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Breidahl AF, Judson RT, Clunie GJ. Review of keratinocyte culture techniques: Problems of growing skin. Aust N Z J Surg 1989;59:485-97.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Reid CB, Cloos J, Snow GB, Braakhuis BJ. A simple and reliable technique for culturing of human oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Acta Otolaryngol 1997;117:628-33.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,406 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed60    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007