|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 73-76
Juvenile primary extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma, presenting as cheek swelling
J Nandhini1, S Ramasamy1, Ronak Nazir Kaul2, Ravi David Austin1
1 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Rajah Muthiah Dental College and Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Web Publication||2-Feb-2018|
Dr. J Nandhini
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Rajah Muthiah Dental College and Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram - 608 002, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Angiofibroma is a locally advancing immensely vascular tumor that essentially arises from the nasopharynx. The clinical characteristics of extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma (ENA) do not accord to that of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma and can present a diagnostic confront. We describe a case of primary juvenile ENA in a 19-year-old patient who presented with a rapidly enlarging mass of the cheek region. The case is unusual because of its anatomic location. The diagnostic and management particulars are sketched.
Keywords: Cheek swelling, extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma, masticator space, vascular tumor
|How to cite this article:|
Nandhini J, Ramasamy S, Kaul RN, Austin RD. Juvenile primary extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma, presenting as cheek swelling. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2018;22, Suppl S1:73-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Nandhini J, Ramasamy S, Kaul RN, Austin RD. Juvenile primary extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma, presenting as cheek swelling. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 13];22, Suppl S1:73-6. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2018/22/4/73/224628
| Introduction|| |
Angiofibroma is histologically benign, but locally aggressive highly vascular tumors that virtually always arise from the nasopharynx in the region of the sphenopalatine foramen and pterygopalatine fossa, accounting for 0.05%–0.5% of all head-and-neck neoplasms. Angiofibromas have been sporadically described in extranasopharyngeal locations that occur in other areas apart from the nasopharynx. As on 2004, a total of 65 patients with atypical localizations of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma have been reported, with the maxillary sinus being the most commonly involved site. The masticatory space is an uncommon location for these tumors, and our research indicates that no case has been reported in that location.
The clinical characteristics of extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma (ENA) do not conform to that of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Therefore, they can present diagnostic challenges. We, therefore, present a rare case of juvenile ENA that was confined predominantly to the masseter muscle region, with neither sphenopalatine foramen nor nasopharynx involvement, presenting as a cheek swelling.
| Case Report|| |
A 19-year-old male patient reported to an outpatient Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology in a dental college and hospital, with a 2-month history of rapidly enlarging painful swelling in the left cheek region. There was a history of trauma on the left side of the face before a couple of months due to an external force and had immediate pain. A small swelling was noticed around 15 days later by his friends and neighbors, and this gradually grew to reach the present dimension. The swelling seems to increase in size after waking up from the bed and while bending downward and mildly reduced in size while under heavy work. The patient consulted various local physicians, and there was no reduction in the size of the swelling in spite of taking medications prescribed by them. His past medical, surgical and dental history was not contributory.
On extraoral examination, there was a diffused swelling on the left side of the face [Figure 1], which measured about 8 cm × 6 cm that extended superoinferiorly from temple region to 1 cm short of the base of the mandible and anteroposteriorly 1 cm short of ala of the nose to tragus of ear, which was mildly warm, tender and had variable consistency, i.e. firm to hard in center and soft to firm at the periphery. The right submandibular lymph node was palpable and tender. On intraoral soft-tissue examination, erosive areas were noted on the posterior part of buccal mucosa and vestibule from 25 to 28 regions and obliteration of buccal vestibule with tenderness evident in the 25–28 regions. On hard-tissue examination, grade I mobility was present from 24 to 27.
|Figure 1: Clinical photograph of the patient showing swelling of the left cheek|
Click here to view
Routine hematological investigations were found to be within the normal limits.
Ultrasonogram [Figure 2]a of the left cheek showed a hypoechoic focus of size 4 cm in intramuscular plane in masseter muscle extending up to the buccal space. Minimal color uptake was noted on color Doppler.
|Figure 2: (a) Ultrasonogram shows 4 cm hypoechoic foci. (b) Computed tomography shows soft-tissue mass with positive Holman–Miller sign in the lateral wall of the left maxillary sinus. (c) Magnetic resonance imaging shows isointense soft-tissue mass in T1-weighted images in the left masticator space|
Click here to view
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) [Figure 2]b showed a lobulated, 6 cm soft-tissue dense mass in the left masticator space, abutting lateral pterygoid and masseter muscles, with extension craniocaudally from the infratemporal fossa to the buccal space, anteriorly to the lateral wall of orbit and zygomaticus major, medially to the pterygomaxillary fissure and para maxillary space; posteriorly, it is confined within the masseter muscle. The mass showed heterogeneous enhancement with minimal central necrosis in the inferior aspect. Bowing of lateral wall of the left maxillary sinus was noted (Holman–Miller sign).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [Figure 2]c performed a month later showed a relatively well-defined 7 cm isointense mass with T1-weighted images, isotense to hyperintense in T2-weighted images and short tau inversion recovery (STIR). The epicenter and extent of the mass were almost the same as noted in CT. There were multiplanar linear flow voids within the lesion. Postcontrast, lesion shows intense heterogeneous enhancement. On digital subtraction angiography, the left superficial temporal artery was prominent and few branches from it supplied the lesion.
Fine-needle aspiration was nondiagnostic as it showed only formed elements of blood.
After obtaining the consent, photographs were taken and diagnostic and therapeutic excision was executed on July 2015 under general anesthesia through extraoral approach, and the mass was removed in toto by applying countertraction [Figure 3]a, [Figure 3]b, [Figure 3]c, [Figure 3]d, [Figure 3]e. Owing to massive bleeding which was met intraoperatively of about 300 ml, a unit of fresh blood transfusion was made. Postoperative recovery was uneventful.
|Figure 3: (a) Preoperative patient preparation. (b) Extraoral incision and exposure of the mass. (c) Soft-tissue mass after excision. (d) Cut section of the excised mass. (e) Postoperative profile after 2 months|
Click here to view
Histopathological examination showed parts of tumor composed of thin- and a few thick-walled ectatic vascular channels lined by attenuated endothelial cells set in a fibroblastic stroma composed of uniform spindle-shaped cells. There is no increase in mitotic figures or evidence of atypia [Figure 4]a and [Figure 4]b, and the features were compatible with the pathohistological diagnosis of angiofibroma.
|Figure 4: (a and b) Histopathological picture showing fibrous tissues along with scattered vascular channels ×50 and ×100, respectively|
Click here to view
Immunohistochemistry showed positive for vimentin [Figure 5]a, and CD 34 highlights the vascular channels [Figure 5]b.
|Figure 5: (a) Immunohistochemical stain of angiofibroma showing vimentin-positive fibroblastic stroma ×100. (b) Immunohistochemical stain of angiofibroma showing CD 34 shows positive for vascular channels ×100|
Click here to view
The patient is under regular follow-up and no recurrence was noted.
| Discussion|| |
Majority of the Studies Have Reported That the Head-And-Neck Region Is the Common Site for Vascular and Fibrous Tumors Whether Benign or Malignant. Hippocrates Described a Vascular Tumor That Predominantly Had Fibrous Stroma in the 5Th century Bc, but Chauveau first Used the Term Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma (Jna) in 1906. Jna Is a Relatively Rare Tumor With an Incidence Ranging between 1:6000 and 1:55,000 of the Population. Although They Occur Almost Exclusively in Male Adolescent, There Have Been Occasional Reports of Juvenile Angiofibroma Occurring De Novo In Adult Men and Women.
Although many theories have been put forward for its origin, current evidence indicates that angiofibroma does not originate in the nasopharynx, as assumed, but rather from a fibrovascular nidus in the posterolateral wall of the nasal cavity in the vicinity of the sphenopalatine foramen.
Despite their characteristically benign histopathologic appearance, juvenile angiofibroma tends to be locally aggressive tumors that have a propensity to extend some distance from their primary site of origin from the nasopharynx, nearby the area of sphenopalatine foramen, often encountered extending well beyond the nasopharynx along natural tissue planes, foramina, and fissures that interconnect the defined compartments of the head and neck typically by submucosal extension. Lateral extension from the pterygopalatine fossa into the pterygomaxillary fissure and infratemporal fossa is also frequent whereas intraorbital and superior intracranial invasion is less frequently observed but not uncommon.
In a review of 704 cases of angiofibroma by Tasca and Compadretti, 13 cases presented outside the nasopharynx, suggesting extranasopharyngeal possibility. In 2004, Windfuhr and Remmert reviewed the literature and compiled 65 cases of ENAs where four cases had an oropharyngeal origin and the maxilla was the most commonly affected site. Reports of primary ENAs, especially those originating in the buccal space , and infratemporal space,,,,, have appeared exceptionally in the literature. Besides the different location, Celik et al. also opined that typical clinical characteristics of ENAs, such as symptoms, age and sex, do not conform to a great extent with that of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma and henceforth should be referred to as “atypical angiofibroma.”
Angiofibroma is composed of a rich vascular network within a fibrous stroma. The smaller vessels in the central part of the lesion typically lack muscular elastic laminae, and the absence of muscular coat contributes to the capacity for massive bleeding that occurs with angiofibroma. This feature of massive bleeding in angiofibroma was encountered intraoperatively in our case by blood loss of about 300 ml which necessitated transfusion of a unit of whole blood. There is immunohistochemical evidence to suggest that juvenile angiofibroma has abundant noradrenergic innervation  and appears to contain an angiogenic growth factor. Vascularization arises most frequently from the maxillary artery branch of external carotid, with background vascularization arising from blood vessels in the ascending pharyngeal artery and internal carotid artery. In our case, the tumor was supplied by the superficial temporal artery.
Although atypical in location (masticator space), our case showed typical and characteristic features and radiologic finding, including strong contrast enhancement on CT and MRI, signal-void areas representing tumor vessels visible on MRI images, as well as intensive vascular blush. CT and MRI scans have been advocated as optimal diagnostic techniques for evaluation of ENAs. However, signs of suspected hypervascularity indicate the need for arteriography and carotid angiography before surgical procedures to arrange the necessary precautions, such as embolization, and reduce the risk of brisk bleeding during tumor removal.
Although surgical approach with preoperative transarterial embolization through super-selective catheterization of supplying arterial pedicles with polyvinyl alcohol particles remains the standard conventional endovascular therapeutic approach to these tumors, direct puncture techniques with liquid adhesives injected directly into the tumor neovasculature have been successfully used. Other methods of treatment that have been employed are irradiation, hormone therapy, cryotherapy, arterial ligation and use of sclerosing agents. Future therapy for JNA may include intra-arterial immunotherapy and the use of certain agents that inhibit angiogenesis.
| Conclusion|| |
ENA is a very rare tumor to be found within the masticator space. By virtue of their location, they can have variable presenting signs and symptoms, which can present a diagnostic challenge. However, it must be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of cheek swelling suggestive of vascular nature and should be regarded as a potential, though exceptional, site of origin for these neoplasms. A very strong index of suspicion is required to diagnose an ENA.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Witt TR, Shah JP, Sternberg SS. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. A 30 year clinical review. Am J Surg 1983;146:521-5.
Windfuhr JP, Remmert S. Extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma: Etiology, incidence and management. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:880-9.
Chauveau UC. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Arch Int Laryng 1906;21:889.
McDaniel RK, Houston GD. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with lateral extension into the cheek: Report of case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:473-6.
Neel HB 3rd
, Whicker JH, Devine KD, Weiland LH. Juvenile angiofibroma. Review of 120 cases. Am J Surg 1973;126:547-56.
Gullane PJ, Davidson J, O'Dwyer T, Forte V. Juvenile angiofibroma: A review of the literature and a case series report. Laryngoscope 1992;102:928-33.
Tasca I, Compadretti GC. Extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma of nasal septum. A controversial entity. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2008;28:312-4.
Dere H, Ozcan KM, Ergul G, Bahar S, Ozcan I, Kulacoglu S, et al.
Extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma of the cheek. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:141-4.
Vineet S, Ramesh V, Kshitiz R, Sriram KJ. Angiofibroma masquerading as a cheek swelling – A diagnostic dilemma. J Int Med Sci Acad 2013;26:111-2.
Hora JF, Weller WA. Extranasopharyngeal juvenile angiofibroma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1961;70:164-70.
Whitlock RI. Angiofibroma of the cheek. Br Dent J 1961;111:372-4.
Irby WB. Angiofibroma of cheek and infratemporal fossa. J Oral Surg 1961;19:296-301.
Isherwood I, Dogra TS, Farrington WT. Extranasopharyngeal juvenile angiofibroma. J Laryngol Otol 1975;89:535-44.
Gupta M, Motwani G, Gupta P. Extranasopharyngeal angiofibroma arising from the infratemporal region. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;58:312-5.
Celik B, Erisen L, Saraydaroglu O, Coskun H. Atypical angiofibromas: A report of four cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:415-21.
Mariño-Enríquez A, Fletcher CD. Angiofibroma of soft tissue: Clinicopathologic characterization of a distinctive benign fibrovascular neoplasm in a series of 37 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2012;36:500-8.
Wang HW, Su WY, Wang JY. Noradrenergic innervation of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1994;251:123-6.
Dillard DG, Cohen C, Muller S, Del Gaudio J, Reichman O, Parrish B, et al.
Immunolocalization of activated transforming growth factor beta1 in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:723-5.
Lloyd G, Howard D, Phelps P, Cheesman A. Juvenile angiofibroma: The lesson of 20 years of modern imaging. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:127-34.
Mehmet A, Orhan S, Suphi M. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: Radiological evaluation and preoperative embolization. KBB Forum 2006;5:58-61.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]