Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 285
 

Oral rhabdomyosarcoma in an adult male: A rare case report


Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission16-Jan-2017
Date of Acceptance03-Dec-2017
Date of Web Publication2-Aug-2018

Correspondence Address:
Tabita Joy
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai - 400 001, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_11_17

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Rhabdomyosarcoma is a malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal cells, showing varying degrees of striated muscle cell differentiation. It predominantly occurs in children while rarely found in adults and involvement of the oral cavity accounts for only 10%–12% of all head-and-neck cases. Herewith, we present a rare case of spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma in a 52-year old male, involving the mandibular gingiva, and describe the clinical, radiological, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings.


Keywords: Immunohistochemistry, mandibular gingiva, rhabdomyosarcoma, striated muscle


How to cite this article:
Joy T, Tupkari JV, Hanchate AV, Siwach P. Oral rhabdomyosarcoma in an adult male: A rare case report. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2018;22:285

How to cite this URL:
Joy T, Tupkari JV, Hanchate AV, Siwach P. Oral rhabdomyosarcoma in an adult male: A rare case report. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 15];22:285. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2018/22/2/285/238265





   Introduction Top


Sarcomas of the head-and-neck region are found only in 1% of all head-and-neck malignancies.[1] Among the soft-tissue sarcomas, rhabdomyosarcoma predominantly occurs in children (60%) while is rarely found in the adults (2%–5%).[2],[3] Rhabdomyosarcoma is a malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal cells, showing varying degrees of striated muscle cell differentiation.[4] The common sites of occurrence are the head-and-neck region (35%), genitourinary tract (23%), retroperitoneum and the extremities (17%).[5] Rhabdomyosarcomas of the oral cavity are extremely rare, accounting for only 10%–12% of all head-and-neck cases.[2] In the oral cavity, it mostly involves the tongue followed by soft palate, hard palate and the buccal mucosa, may also involve the gingiva in very rare cases.[2],[5]

Rhabdomyosarcoma often poses difficulty in diagnosis, as it exhibits a spectrum of histologic appearance which includes embryonal, botryoid, spindle cell, alveolar and undifferentiated variants.[6]

In 1992, Cavazzana et al. in their study reported 21 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas composed predominantly (>80%) of elongated spindle cells which mimicked the fetal myotubes, at the late stage of cellular differentiation. On immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, the cells showed a high degree of skeletal muscle differentiation. The term spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma was coined to distinguish this entity from the usual embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma due to its more favorable clinical course.[7] This variant of rhabdomyosarcoma was first reported in adults by Rubin et al.[1] These adult-type spindle cell lesions have several distinctive features, including a predilection for the head-and-neck region, a greater degree of cytologic atypia in the spindled cells, focal areas resembling pseudovascular sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma and a more aggressive clinical course than pediatric lesions.[7]

Herewith, we report a rare case of spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma of mandibular gingiva in a 52-year-old male.


   Case Report Top


A 52-year-old male patient reported to the Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, with the chief complaint of growth in the left lower back region of jaw for the past 4 months. The patient gave the history of caries in 36 which led to the fracture of crown 8 months back. He had habit of gutkha chewing 2–3 times a day and alcohol intake for 20 years.

On extra-oral examination, a diffuse swelling was noticed, [Figure 1]a extending anteroposteriorly from corner of the mouth to 1 cm anterior to the angle of the mandible and superoinferiorly from the corner of the mouth to the inferior border of the mandible. The left submandibular lymph node was palpable, mobile and nontender.
Figure 1: (a) Diffuse swelling seen on the left side of the mandible. (b) Intra-oral view shows exophytic, lobulated, sessile growth on left lower buccal gingiva

Click here to view


Intraoral examination revealed an exophytic, lobulated, sessile growth on buccal gingiva [Figure 1]b measuring 4 cm × 2.5 cm extending from the left mandibular first molar to the distal of third molar, obliterating buccal vestibule. Expansion of buccal cortical plate was noticed. 37 and 38 showed Grade-1 mobility.

Orthopantomogram revealed an irregular bone loss [Figure 2]a extending from 35 to 38 region. Root pieces of 36 and floating teeth appearance with 37 and 38 was noted. Cone beam computed tomography showed the destruction of both buccal and lingual cortical plates [Figure 2]b along with erosion of superior border of mandibular canal.
Figure 2: (a) Orthopantomogram shows an irregular bone loss in 35 to 38 region. (b) Cone beam computed tomography shows destruction of buccal cortical plate and thinning of lingual cortical plate

Click here to view


Incisional biopsy was performed under local anesthesia after obtaining patient's written consent.

The H and E stained section showed a highly cellular connective tissue stroma covered by parakeratotic stratified squamous epithelium. The connective tissue consisted of three types of cells as follows: (1) cells with vesicular nuclei (2) hyperchromatic spindle-shaped nuclei and (3) large polyhedral cells with hyperchromatic condensed nuclei at periphery [Figure 3]a. High power magnification view showed cellular and nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear hyperchromatism and abnormal mitotic figures [Figure 3]b.
Figure 3: (a) Highly cellular connective tissue stroma covered by parakeratotic stratified squamous epithelium (H&E, ×4). (b) High power magnification view showed cellular and nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear hyperchromatism and abnormal mitotic figures (H&E, ×40)

Click here to view


Immunohistochemistry revealed focally positive cells for both cytokeratin and vimentin in the connective tissue. Based on the above findings, a diagnosis of spindle cell variant of squamous cell carcinoma was given.

The patient was then referred to the higher center for further treatment. Positron emission tomography scan was performed to rule out any metastatic foci. Left hemimandibulectomy with radical neck dissection was done and the excised mass was sent for histopathological evaluation. The H and E stained section of excisional biopsy showed highly cellular connective tissue stroma composed of elongated spindle-shaped cells with hyperchromatic nuclei, arranged in fascicles [Figure 4]a. Marked cellular and nuclear pleomorphism were noted [Figure 4]b. Numerous large eosinophilic cells with vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli resembling rhabdomyoblast were also noted. The overlying stratified squamous epithelium, however, did not show any dysplasia.
Figure 4: (a) Hyper-cellular connective tissue showing spindle cells arranged in fascicular pattern. (b) Marked cellular and nuclear pleomorphism seen. (c) On immunohistochemistry, tumor was strongly and diffusely positive for desmin. (d) Shows diffusely and focally positive for MyoD1. (e) Shows diffusely and focally positive for myogenin. (f) Shows weak positivity for AE1/AE3. (g) Shows negativity for P63

Click here to view


Further immunohistochemistry was performed, tumor was strongly and diffusely positive for desmin [Figure 4]c; diffusely and focally positive for MyoD1 and myogenin [Figure 4]d and [Figure 4]e; Tumor also showed weak positivity for AE1/AE3 [Figure 4]f; while negativity for CK5/6, P63 [Figure 4]g; S100 and SMA. Based on the above findings, the diagnosis of spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma was given.

The patient is subjected to chemotherapy for the past 1 year and postoperative follow-up did not reveal any recurrence.


   Discussion Top


Rhabdomyosarcoma was initially described by Weber in 1854 in a tongue lesion,[8] but first documentation was published by Arthur Purdy Stout in 1946.[9] Horn and Enterline devised the first classification scheme in 1958, based on the clinical and pathologic features of these tumors. This scheme, also known as the “conventional scheme,” recognized embryonal, botryoid, alveolar and pleomorphic subtypes. From 1987 to 1991, the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (now recognized as the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group) conducted a comparative study of the various classification systems for rhabdomyosarcoma. Based on the reproducibility and prognostic significance of each of these systems, this group proposed a classification scheme, known as the International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma.[7]

International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma (1994) as follows:[10]

  • Superior prognosis
  • Botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Intermediate prognosis
  • Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Poor prognosis
  • Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Undifferentiated sarcoma
  • Subtypes whose prognosis is not presently evaluable
  • Rhabdomyosarcoma with rhabdoid features.[7]


According to this classification, our case can be placed as a spindle cell RMS having superior prognosis than the embryonal RMS.

Histopathology of RMS is analogous to myogenesis in the developing embryo, yielding clues to the biology of these lesions.[11] As the skeletal muscle fibers are permanent cells that do not divide after birth, it is unlikely for rhabdomyosarcoma to arise from skeletal muscle fibers themselves.[12] Thus, RMS is considered as a tumor derived from primitive mesenchyme, exhibiting a profound tendency toward myogenesis.[11]

Little is known about the underlying cause of the rhabdomyoblastic proliferations and the stimulus that induces their growth. Genetic factors are implicated by the association of RMS with other neoplasms such as congenital retinoblastoma, familial adenomatous polyposis, multiple lentigines syndrome, type 1 neurofibromatosis, Costello syndrome, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and a variety of congenital anomalies.[7],[13]

Each of the rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes occur in a characteristic age group.[7] The embryonal type presents the subtypes including classic, spindle cell and botryoid and is the most common variant, occurring in children between birth to 15 years of age. However, our case was reported in a 52-year-old male patient, which falls in the rare age group. The embryonal RMS contains a mixture of spindle and undifferentiated round cells and immature striated muscle-like cells (rhabdomyoblasts) with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm either tightly or loosely packed in a myxoid stroma. The botryoid tumor is named so because of gross resemblance to cluster of grapes. Histologically, a multilayered band of cells just below the surface epithelium called the cambium layer is a special finding of this variant.[7] The alveolar type presents in the older children (10–25 years old) and contains clusters of small round cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm separated by fibrovascular septa. Pleomorphic type occurs in older people between the age group of 50–60 years and is characterized histologically by large bizarre cells of racquet, strap, ribbon and spindle types in a haphazard arrangement.[14]

Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma is composed of almost exclusively of elongated fusiform cells with cigar-shaped nuclei and prominent nucleoli. The tumor cells have eosinophilic fibrillar cytoplasm with distinct cellular borders, closely resembling late-stage fetal myoblasts. Cytoplasmic cross-striations may be observed. The collagen-rich form is characterized by spindle cells separated by abundant collagen fibers arranged in a storiform or whorled growth pattern. The collagen-poor form is a more cellular proliferation of cells arranged in bundles, or fascicles, reminiscent of fibrosarcoma,[7] (as seen in our case).

Males are affected more commonly than females by a ratio of approximately 1.5:1, but the male predominance is less pronounced during adolescence and young adulthood.[7]

The presenting signs and symptoms of RMS are variable and are influenced by the site of origin, the age of the patient and the presence or absence of distant metastases. In affected patients, the tumor expands and infiltrates the muscle from which it arises, presenting first as a well demarcated nodule or polypoid lesion with a soft or gummy consistency. Patient in the present case, presented with lobulated, painless growth on the buccal gingiva.[8]

A site predilection within oral regions has not been well established; some authors have stated that the tongue is the most common site. As rhabdomyosarcoma is considered to be derived from primitive mesenchymal cells,[11],[15] it has been reported in areas where the striated muscle is absent such as the common bile duct or the urinary bladder and may be the gingiva in the oral cavity. Furthermore, a case of multifocal RMS occurring in bone marrow has been reported, which suggests the pluripotentiality of this tissue. Although mandibular lesions are rare, our case and the documentations in the literature suggest that rhabdomyosarcoma should be considered in differential diagnosis.[15]

It is a challenge to diagnose RMS, both clinically and histopathologically, due to its varied appearances. Further, rhabdomyoblasts may adopt numerous appearances, including small round cells to ribbon- or strap-shaped to large and pleomorphic cells. Rhabdomyoblasts with cross-striations are infrequently identified and their absence does not exclude the diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma.[4],[16] Second, an associated benign inflammatory infiltrate may predominate, overrunning and masking the presence of the neoplastic cells. In the presence of a poorly differentiated neoplasm lacking evidence of cross-striations, special stains and immunohistochemistry are invaluable in confirming the diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma.[16] A careful histological examination is required to differentiate such lesions from other poorly differentiated round and spindle cell sarcomas such as Ewing's sarcoma, neuroblastoma, peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors and malignant lymphomas.[6],[13]

Many immunohistochemical markers have been applied to the diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma, but their diagnostic value, sensitivity and specificity vary substantially.[7] Commitment and maintenance of skeletal muscle differentiation during normal skeletal muscle myogenesis, as well as in rhabdomyosarcoma, is regulated by a family of closely related genes (e.g. MyoD1, myogenin, myf5 and MRF4), termed the MyoD family.[6],[8] These genes encode a series of DNA-binding proteins that control the activation and transcription of genes encoding muscle enzymes and proteins, such as creatine kinase and desmin. Therefore, desmin, MyoD1 and myogenin are considered useful markers in diagnosing rhabdomyosarcomas and for differentiating it from other soft-tissue tumors.[8],[10]

Inadequately treated tumors grow in an infiltrative, destructive manner and recur in a high percentage of cases. Bone does not constitute an effective barrier to the growth of the tumor, and bone invasion is a frequent finding, particularly with RMS in the head-and-neck region.[7]

Metastases develop during the disease and are present at the time of diagnosis in about 20% of cases.[7] Major metastatic sites include the lung, lymph nodes and bone marrow.[3] However, the present case showed only regional lymph node metastasis.

Treatment and prognosis

Since the early 1960s, overall 5-year survival rate of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma increased from 25% to 73% due to a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach that consists of surgical removal of the neoplasm and multi-agent chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy.[13]


   Conclusion Top


The ubiquitous distribution and diverse histologic pattern of RMS possess a challenge to the diagnosis; judicious use of immunohistochemical markers may help in diagnosis by ruling out other differential diagnosis.[4] RMS is a rare disease in adulthood and therefore, the clinic-pathological characteristics, natural history and treatment options are not as well established in this population. However, recognition of the correct diagnosis and histological subtype of RMS is of critical importance in the treatment and prognosis of this disease.[3]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Hartmann S, Lessner G, Mentzel T, Kubler AC, Richter DM. An adult spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma in the head and neck region with long term survival: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2014;8:208-13.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Arul AS, Verma S, Arul AS, Verma R. Oral rhabdomyosarcoma-embryonal subtype in an adult: A rarity. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2014;5:222-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ram H, Gupta S, Mohammad S, Chandra A. Aggressive rhabdomyosarcoma of palate: A case report and literature review. J Orofac Sci 2014;6:137-40.  Back to cited text no. 3
  [Full text]  
4.
Muala HA, Alaboudy A. Embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma case report and literature review. Internet J Head Neck Surg 2009;4:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shrutha SP, Vinit GB. Rhabdomyosarcoma in a pediatric patient: A rare case report. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6:113-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Arya K, Vij H, Vij R, Rao NN. Rhabdomyosarcoma of mandible: A diagnostic predicament. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2011;15:320-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
  [Full text]  
7.
Goldblum JR, Weiss SW, Folpe AL, editors. Rhabdomyosarcoma. In: Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.; 2014. p. 601-38.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Tandon A, Sethi K, Pratap Singh A. Oral rhabdomyosarcoma: A review. J Clin Exp Dent 2012;4:e302-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Rajasekhar G, Vura N, Kant S, Dhanala S, Srikanth D. Rhabdomyosarcoma – Report of two cases and review. Int J Clin Dent Sci 2011;2:16-20.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Cobanoglu B, Simsek M, Senol S. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the upper lip in an adult patient. Case Rep Med 2015;2015:508051.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sudhakar S, Geethika V, Rao N, Smitha B, Kiran ChS. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma on the left maxillary alveolus: A unique presentation. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZD07-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Chen SY, Thakur A, Miller AS, Harwick RD. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the oral cavity. Report of four cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:192-201.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Radzikowska J, Kukwa W, Kukwa A, Czarnecka A, Krzeski A. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck in children. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2015;19:98-107.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Parviz D, Saeideh K. Oral rhabdomyosarcoma: A case report. J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;4:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Peters E, Cohen M, Altini M, Murray J. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the oral and paraoral region. Cancer 1989;63:963-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Wenig BM, Pilch BZ. Tumors of upper respiratory tract. In: Fletcher CD, editor. Textbook of Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 123-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,135 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed103    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded45    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007