Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 244-251
 

Alteration of cellular metabolism in cancer cells and its therapeutic prospects


Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, S.C.B. Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India

Date of Submission28-Mar-2017
Date of Acceptance18-Jul-2017
Date of Web Publication18-Aug-2017

Correspondence Address:
Biranchi Narayan Biswal
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, S.C.B. Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack - 753 007, Odisha
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_60_17

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Transformation of a normal cell into a cancerous phenotype is essentially backed by genetic mutations that trigger several oncogenic signaling pathways. These signaling pathways rewire the cellular metabolism to meet the bioenergetic and biomass requirement of proliferating cell, which is different from a quiescent cell. Although the change of metabolism in a cancer cell was observed and studied in the mid-20th century, it was not adequate to explain oncogenesis. Now, equipped with a revolution of oncogenes, we have a genetic basis to explain the transformation. Through several studies, it is clear now that such metabolic alterations not only promote cancer progression but also contribute to the chemoresistance of cancer. Targeting specific enzymes and combinations of enzymes can improve the efficacy of cancer therapy and help to overcome the therapeutic resistance.


Keywords: Cancer cell, metabolic alterations, therapeutics


How to cite this article:
Biswal BN, Das SN, Das BK, Rath R. Alteration of cellular metabolism in cancer cells and its therapeutic prospects. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2017;21:244-51

How to cite this URL:
Biswal BN, Das SN, Das BK, Rath R. Alteration of cellular metabolism in cancer cells and its therapeutic prospects. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 13];21:244-51. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2017/21/2/244/213208



   Introduction Top


The relationship between cancer and altered cellular metabolism has been deciphered decades ago. However, the importance of tumor metabolism has dwindled over the past due to limited knowledge of tumorigenesis. It's only after the oncogenic revolution, the interest in tumor cell metabolism and signaling pathways is being renewed, and presently metabolic reprogramming is considered as a hallmark of cancer.[1]

The three basic requirements of cancer to sustain are rapid growth and proliferation of cancer cells, the capability of the tumor cells to evade the normal apoptotic pathways, thus favoring survival and unrestricted entry of the tumor cells into cell cycle progression even in the absence of growth signals. All these requirements are met by the tumor cell by acquiring a phenotype as a result of various host cell mutations that combine to alter the metabolic pathways. Many of these adaptations are also seen in rapidly proliferating normal cells, in which they represent appropriate response to physiological growth signals as opposed to constitutive cell autonomous adaptations.[2],[3] In case of cancer, this adaptability should also work in a stressful microenvironment which is deficit in nutrients.[4]

Energy and biomass requirement of proliferating cells are more than that of normal cells. In tumor cells when nutrients are abundant, the requirements are met by reprogramming pathways to increase acquisition and utilization of nutrients, and in case of nutrient stress, the metabolism is rewired to compensate for the scarcity of one nutrient by filling the metabolite pool with another nutrient.[5],[6],[7]

In this review, we will discuss the alterations in cellular metabolism that the transforming cells undergo to sustain and proliferate in all nutrient conditions. Further, how these alterations can produce opportunity to target specific enzymes or combination of enzymes will also be discussed.


   Nutrient Sufficiency State Top


In the presence of abundant nutrient, oncogenic RAS stimulates the uptake and utilization of glucose[8],[9] by activation of PI3K pathway [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].[10] PI3K pathway is one of the most commonly altered pathways in many human cancers. Apart from oncogenic RAS, this pathway is also activated by mutation in the tumor suppressor gene PTEN[11],[12],[13] or by aberrant signaling from receptor tyrosine kinase.[14] The activation of PIK3 in turn activates the downstream effectors AKT1 which strongly stimulates signaling through mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) by inhibiting tuberin.[15] At molecular level, mTOR indirectly causes metabolic changes by activating transcription factors such as hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1). HIF1 is a heterodimer that is stabilized in hypoxia.[16] However, it can also be activated in normal oxygen concentration by oncogenic signaling pathways such as PI3K.[17],[18] HIF1, once activated, amplifies transcription of gene encoding glucose transporter (GLUT1) and most glycolytic enzymes, increasing influx of glucose into cell.[19]
Figure 1: Glucose metabolism (represented by solid lines) in a quiescent cell

Click here to view
Figure 2: Genetic mutations of gene such as RAS and PTEN can trigger several oncogenic signaling pathways such as PI3K and mammalian target of rapamycin that in turn upregulate glucose transporters and enzymes that catalyze various steps of glycolysis, thus favoring aerobic glycolysis

Click here to view


High expression of MYC collaborates with HIF1 inactivation of glucose receptors and glycolytic enzymes.[20],[21] Increased MYC also enhances glutamine uptake and metabolism.[22],[23] Glutamine has an added advantage of providing its two nitrogen atoms for biomass synthesis.[24]

In terms of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation, one of the most characteristic metabolic alterations occurring in tumor cells is shift from ATP generation through oxidative phosphorylation to ATP generation through glycolysis, even in the presence of normal oxygen concentration (Warburg effect).[25] Although the ATP generation by this pathway is faster, it is inefficient in terms of number of ATPs produced per glucose molecule. Earlier it was hypothesized that this shift might an adaptation to defective mitochondria.[26] However, it was later appreciated that mitochondrial defects are rare,[27],[28],[29] and oxygen consumption of tumor cells remains same as that of normal cell. The faster rate of ATP production by this pathway can justify such switch, but this is possible only in an environment where nutrient supply is surplus. The most recent theory regarding the switch believes that aerobic glycolysis provides a biosynthetic advantage for tumor cells by a high flux of substrate through glycolysis.[2],[3]

AKT1, which is a downstream effector of PI3K activation, is an important driver of tumor glycolytic phenotype. It phosphorylates and activates glycolytic enzymes such as hexokinase and phosphofructokinase 2.[15],[30]

The subsequent activation of HIF1 decreases the flow of glucose-derived pyruvate into tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle[31],[32],[33] by activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase which inactivates mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Oncogenic MYC activates lactate dehydrogenase A that catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to lactate.[20],[21] Recently,13 C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements have shown that glioblastoma cells in culture convert as much as 90% of glucose and 60% of glutamine they acquire into lactate or alanine.[34]


   Adaptation to Nutrient Stress Top


For most of the mammalian cells in culture, glucose and glutamine are the only two molecules that are catabolized appreciably to meet most of the energy and biomass requirement of cell.[2] Tumor cell deprived of these nutrients are supposed to die of starvation. On the contrary, nutrient deprivation has been correlated with poor survival of patients[35] suggesting that scarcity of nutrient makes the cancer cell stronger. This may be attributed to the biochemical alterations leading to acquisition of necessary plasticity of cancer cells that is required to reprogram metabolism [Figure 3] in response to different nutritional conditions.
Figure 3: Reprogramming of metabolism in cancer cells, deprived of glucose and glutamine (reduced intake represented by dotted lines). Pool of amino acids and tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, required are maintained by activating pathways that promote autophagy, macropinocytosis and scavenging fatty acids

Click here to view


In most of the cancer cells, oxaloacetate (OAA) in TCA cycle is supplied by glutamine which compliment with acetyl-CoA from glucose. In case of glucose deprivation, carbon from glutamine has been seen to be rerouted to acetyl CoA in some cancers.[5] Similarly, glutamine deficiency can induce metabolic pathway changes. One of such changes is a loss of citrate synthase. Citrate synthase condenses OAA to acetyl-CoA to maintain TCA cycle.[35] However, in scarcity of glutamine, OAA is shunted toward asparagine formation to support cell survival.[36] Expression of asparagine synthetase has been seen to be associated with poor prognosis of glioma and neuroblastoma,[37] suggesting that maintenance of asparagine pool may provide an advantage to tumor cells.

In RAS expression, cancer, glutamine stimulates macropinocytosis.[38] In this process, extracellular matrix is captured and internalized. This allows starving cell to generate pools of glutamine and other amino acids supply to TCA cycle.[38] This process must be highly controlled as hyperactive macropinocytosis can lead to cell death in a process previously misidentified as autophagic cell death.

Along with scavenging on extracellular matrix, autophagic degradation of macromolecules is also active in cancer cells.[39],[40],[41],[42] During autophagy, the organelles and the macromolecules are degenerated to produce small molecule nutrients to feed intermediary metabolism.[38],[41],[43] This process has been seen to be crucial in tumor growth and survival of cancer cells in some RAS driven tumor.[44]

In the presence of oxygen and abundant nutrients, cell synthesizes fatty acids de novo.[45],[46] However, under nutrient stress, scavenging extracellular lipids become an adaptive mechanism for the cell.[47],[48] Scavenging instead of synthesizing spares the cell from the need to supply carbon to pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) for NADPH production which is required for lipid synthesis. In case of ovarian cancer, a cooperative mechanism exists between stromal cell and cancer cell. The stromal cells have been found to provide fatty acid to tumor cells. When ovarian cancer cells were cocultured with adipocytes, the transfer of fatty acid from adipocytes to tumor cells triggered activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase and fatty acid oxidation leading to enhanced cell proliferation.[49]

Deprivation of glucose or glutamine leads to activation of serine synthesis pathway (SSP) in tumor cells.[50] By this pathway, serine and glycine can be synthesized from glutamine by a process “reverse glycolysis.”[51] Serine driven one carbon metabolism produces reducing equivalent (NADPH) with a comparable importance to PPP.[52] Serine binding has also been related to activation of PKM2 enzymatic activation.[53] M2 is an isoform of pyruvate kinase which is present in self-renewing cells such as embryonic and adult stem cells.[54] It is found to be expressed in many tumor cells and therefore might be a useful biomarker for early detection of tumors.[4],[55],[56],[57] Unlike the other isoform PKM1, it is usually found inactive and is inefficient at promoting glycolysis.[58],[59],[60] Due to its nature of inhibiting Warburg effect and ATP production, which is unfavorable for tumor progression, presence of PKM2 in cancer cells was ignored for several years. However, recent work has produced evidences that PKM2 exerts a regulatory contribution to SSP.[61] Further work is required to understand the regulatory cascade completely.

Acetate is one of the smallest molecules available as nutrient in mammals. It is converted to acetyl-CoA by acetyl-CoA synthetase. Although acetate has a very low concentration in circulating fluid,[62] it can be taken up by tumor cells and oxidized.[63] However, the primary role of acetate utilization is still to be evaluated.

Depending on the tumor microenvironment, the tumor cells rewire their metabolism to ultimately direct the available nutrient into the synthesis of new biomass while maintaining adequate level of ATP for survival.


   Therapeutic Prospects Top


Over the past few decades, hundreds of genes have been identified that are mutated in cancer. Many of these genetic alterations that are known to promote cancer lead to a single converging metabolic phenotype that is characterized by reorganization of metabolic pathway in such a way that biosynthesis of macromolecules and ATP production to support cell survival are well balanced.[26],[64],[65] As all cancer cells are dependent on this alteration of metabolism, these altered pathways represent attractive therapeutic targets.[66],[67] Further, effective agents targeting many of the common driver mutation in cancer are not available. For example, mutation of RAS or dysregulated expression of MYC is frequent events in human cancer, yet no specific therapies exist to treat cancers based on either genetic event, and many RAS-driven cancers are nonresponsive to existing therapies.[68],[69] RAS-mutant cells are dependent on sufficient glucose uptake,[70] and MYC-dependent cells have a particular reliance on glutamine metabolism.[22],[23],[71] Small molecule inhibitors that disrupt glucose intake and metabolism has been found to decrease the growth of tumors that are derived from cells driven by these oncogenes in preclinical models.[70],[72],[73] Targeting metabolism may also be synergistic with many of the existing therapies such as kinase inhibitor and cytotoxic therapies which act by impairing glucose metabolism.[2],[74],[75]

Cancer development, progression and treatment outcomes are linked to whole body metabolism. Obesity, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance are all associated with an increased risk of developing cancer and worse clinical outcomes in patients suffering from cancer.[76],[77],[78],[79],[80] Insulin and insulin-like growth factor, which are capable of activating signaling pathways that drive cell growth, are increased in circulation of individuals suffering from obesity and insulin resistant. This suggests that obesity and insulin resistance promote cancer at least in part by activating pathways that drive cell growth.[77] These same signaling pathways also drive nutrient uptake into cells.[78] Further, elevated levels of glucose alone can promote increased glucose uptake in some cells, and lower glucose levels are seen to be associated with better cancer treatment outcomes.[81],[82],[83],[84] Hence, antidiabetic drugs are being explored for anticancerous activity. Retrospective clinical studies have shown decreased cancer mortality rate in patients on metformin.[85],[86] Metformin lowers level of glucose and insulin by inhibiting gluconeogenesis.[87] Other antidiabetic drugs which act by other mechanisms such as increasing the level of insulin in blood may worsen the clinical outcome in cancer.

Glutamine is an important nutrient source for cancer cell, and some cancers are addicted to glutamine. This increased reliance of some cancers on glutamine makes glutamine a prospective therapeutic target. Small molecules such as 2-amino-(2, 2, 1)-heptane-2-carboxylic acid that inhibits glutamine transporters have been shown to slow proliferation and tumor growth.[88],[89] Another potential therapeutic target is glutaminase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of glutamine to glutamate. The growth of transformed cells can be selectively inhibited by targeting glutaminase activity.[90],[91] Molecules such as bis-2-(5-phenylacetamido-1, 2, 4-thiodiazol-2-yl) ethyl sulfide have been shown to successful in inhibiting glutaminase.[91],[92]

Although biochemistry and metabolism of transforming cells are extensively studied for the past few decades, targeting cancer metabolism for therapy of cancer still remains as a challenge. As normal proliferating cells have same metabolic requirements as cancer cells, so finding a therapeutic window is difficult. Sometimes, it is assumed that a therapeutic window is obtained by chemotherapeutic agents because cancer cell proliferates more rapidly than normal cells. However, this is not always true. Proliferative cells of gut can have cell cycle as frequently as 10 h[93],[94] and hematopoiesis in human can generate 2 million red blood precursors per se cond.[95] Like the cancer cells, rapidly proliferating cells of immune system rely on aerobic glycolysis[96],[97],[98] and glutamine metabolism.[99],[100] Another challenge in targeting cancer metabolism is the metabolic flexibility of the transformed cell. Cancer cells often have a remarkable ability to shift fuel source when deprived of favored metabolic pathways.[101],[102],[103]


   Conclusion Top


The present cancer therapeutics that target DNA synthesis are not found to be promising because instead of a single tumor-specific metabolism, several metabolic programming exists that promotes proliferation of cancer cell. A better understanding of how metabolism is altered in specific genetic contexts that lead to cancer will guide to formulate strategies to target specific enzyme or combination of enzyme in cancers.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009;324:1029-33.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Newsholme EA, Crabtree B, Ardawi MS. The role of high rates of glycolysis and glutamine utilization in rapidly dividing cells. Biosci Rep 1985;5:393-400.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tatum JL, Kelloff GJ, Gillies RJ, Arbeit JM, Brown JM, Chao KS, et al. Hypoxia: Importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Biol 2006;82:699-757.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Le A, Lane AN, Hamaker M, Bose S, Gouw A, Barbi J, et al. Glucose-independent glutamine metabolism via TCA cycling for proliferation and survival in B cells. Cell Metab 2012;15:110-21.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Yang C, Sudderth J, Dang T, Bachoo RM, McDonald JG, DeBerardinis RJ. Glioblastoma cells require glutamate dehydrogenase to survive impairments of glucose metabolism or Akt signaling. Cancer Res 2009;69:7986-93.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cheng T, Sudderth J, Yang C, Mullen AR, Jin ES, Matés JM, et al. Pyruvate carboxylase is required for glutamine-independent growth of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:8674-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ying H, Kimmelman AC, Lyssiotis CA, Hua S, Chu GC, Fletcher-Sananikone E, et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell 2012;149:656-70.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Flier JS, Mueckler MM, Usher P, Lodish HF. Elevated levels of glucose transport and transporter messenger RNA are induced by ras or src oncogenes. Science 1987;235:1492-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rodriguez-Viciana P, Warne PH, Dhand R, Vanhaesebroeck B, Gout I, Fry MJ, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase as a direct target of Ras. Nature 1994;370:527-32.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, Podsypanina K, Bose S, Wang SI, et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science 1997;275:1943-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Liaw D, Marsh DJ, Li J, Dahia PL, Wang SI, Zheng Z, et al. Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:64-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Steck PA, Pershouse MA, Jasser SA, Yung WK, Lin H, Ligon AH, et al. Identification of a candidate tumour suppressor gene, MMAC1, at chromosome 10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple advanced cancers. Nat Genet 1997;15:356-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wong KK, Engelman JA, Cantley LC. Targeting the PI3K signaling pathway in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2010;20:87-90.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Robey RB, Hay N. Is Akt the “Warburg kinase”?-Akt-energy metabolism interactions and oncogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol 2009;19:25-31.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bertout JA, Patel SA, Simon MC. The impact of O2 availability on human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:967-75.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Plas DR, Thompson CB. Akt-dependent transformation: There is more to growth than just surviving. Oncogene 2005;24:7435-42.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Inoki K, Corradetti MN, Guan KL. Dysregulation of the TSC-mTOR pathway in human disease. Nat Genet 2005;37:19-24.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Semenza GL. HIF-1: Upstream and downstream of cancer metabolism. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2010;20:51-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kim JW, Gao P, Liu YC, Semenza GL, Dang CV. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and dysregulated c-Myc cooperatively induce vascular endothelial growth factor and metabolic switches hexokinase 2 and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:7381-93.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Dang CV, Kim JW, Gao P, Yustein J. The interplay between MYC and HIF in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:51-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Wise DR, DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Sayed N, Zhang XY, Pfeiffer HK, et al. Myc regulates a transcriptional program that stimulates mitochondrial glutaminolysis and leads to glutamine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:18782-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Gao P, Tchernyshyov I, Chang TC, Lee YS, Kita K, Ochi T, et al. c-Myc suppression of miR-23a/b enhances mitochondrial glutaminase expression and glutamine metabolism. Nature 2009;458:762-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
DeBerardinis RJ, Cheng T. Q's next: The diverse functions of glutamine in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene 2010;29:313-24.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956;123:309-14.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Cairns RA, Harris IS, Mak TW. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:85-95.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Frezza C, Gottlieb E. Mitochondria in cancer: Not just innocent bystanders. Semin Cancer Biol 2009;19:4-11.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Fantin VR, St-Pierre J, Leder P. Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell 2006;9:425-34.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Moreno-Sánchez R, Rodríguez-Enríquez S, Marín-Hernández A, Saavedra E. Energy metabolism in tumor cells. FEBS J 2007;274:1393-418.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Elstrom RL, Bauer DE, Buzzai M, Karnauskas R, Harris MH, Plas DR, et al. Akt stimulates aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. Cancer Res 2004;64:3892-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Papandreou I, Cairns RA, Fontana L, Lim AL, Denko NC. HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption. Cell Metab 2006;3:187-97.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Kim JW, Tchernyshyov I, Semenza GL, Dang CV. HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: A metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab 2006;3:177-85.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lu CW, Lin SC, Chen KF, Lai YY, Tsai SJ. Induction of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-3 by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 promotes metabolic switch and drug resistance. J Biol Chem 2008;283:28106-14.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, Nissim I, Yudkoff M, Wehrli S, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: Transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:19345-50.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Le QT, Chen E, Salim A, Cao H, Kong CS, Whyte R, et al. An evaluation of tumor oxygenation and gene expression in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:1507-14.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Zhang J, Fan J, Venneti S, Cross JR, Takagi T, Bhinder B, et al. Asparagine plays a critical role in regulating cellular adaptation to glutamine depletion. Mol Cell 2014;56:205-18.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Deberardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Thompson CB. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent modulation of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A expression regulates lipid metabolism during hematopoietic cell growth. J Biol Chem 2006;281:37372-80.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Commisso C, Davidson SM, Soydaner-Azeloglu RG, Parker SJ, Kamphorst JJ, Hackett S, et al. Macropinocytosis of protein is an amino acid supply route in Ras-transformed cells. Nature 2013;497:633-7.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Goldsmith J, Levine B, Debnath J. Autophagy and cancer metabolism. Methods Enzymol 2014;542:25-57.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Mariño G, Niso-Santano M, Baehrecke EH, Kroemer G. Self-consumption: The interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014;15:81-94.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Rabinowitz JD, White E. Autophagy and metabolism. Science 2010;330:1344-8.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Lum JJ, Bauer DE, Kong M, Harris MH, Li C, Lindsten T, et al. Growth factor regulation of autophagy and cell survival in the absence of apoptosis. Cell 2005;120:237-48.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Lum JJ, DeBerardinis RJ, Thompson CB. Autophagy in metazoans: Cell survival in the land of plenty. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:439-48.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Yang S, Wang X, Contino G, Liesa M, Sahin E, Ying H, et al. Pancreatic cancers require autophagy for tumor growth. Genes Dev 2011;25:717-29.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Swinnen JV, Brusselmans K, Verhoeven G. Increased lipogenesis in cancer cells: New players, novel targets. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2006;9:358-65.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Bauer DE, Hatzivassiliou G, Zhao F, Andreadis C, Thompson CB. ATP citrate lyase is an important component of cell growth and transformation. Oncogene 2005;24:6314-22.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Kamphorst JJ, Cross JR, Fan J, de Stanchina E, Mathew R, White EP, et al. Hypoxic and Ras-transformed cells support growth by scavenging unsaturated fatty acids from lysophospholipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:8882-7.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Young RM, Ackerman D, Quinn ZL, Mancuso A, Gruber M, Liu L, et al. Dysregulated mTORC1 renders cells critically dependent on desaturated lipids for survival under tumor-like stress. Genes Dev 2013;27:1115-31.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Nieman KM, Kenny HA, Penicka CV, Ladanyi A, Buell-Gutbrod R, Zillhardt MR, et al. Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth. Nat Med 2011;17:1498-503.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Sun L, Song L, Wan Q, Wu G, Li X, Wang Y, et al. cMyc-mediated activation of serine biosynthesis pathway is critical for cancer progression under nutrient deprivation conditions. Cell Res 2015;25:429-44.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Ma L, Tao Y, Duran A, Llado V, Galvez A, Barger JF, et al. Control of nutrient stress-induced metabolic reprogramming by PKCζ in tumorigenesis. Cell 2013;152:599-611.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Fan J, Ye J, Kamphorst JJ, Shlomi T, Thompson CB, Rabinowitz JD. Quantitative flux analysis reveals folate-dependent NADPH production. Nature 2014;510:298-302.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Chaneton B, Hillmann P, Zheng L, Martin AC, Maddocks OD, Chokkathukalam A, et al. Serine is a natural ligand and allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase M2. Nature 2012;491:458-62.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Mazurek S, Boschek CB, Hugo F, Eigenbrodt E. Pyruvate kinase type M2 and its role in tumor growth and spreading. Semin Cancer Biol 2005;15:300-8.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Schneider J, Neu K, Grimm H, Velcovsky HG, Weisse G, Eigenbrodt E. Tumor M2-pyruvate kinase in lung cancer patients: Immunohistochemical detection and disease monitoring. Anticancer Res 2002;22:311-8.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Cerwenka H, Aigner R, Bacher H, Werkgartner G, el-Shabrawi A, Quehenberger F, et al. TUM2-PK (pyruvate kinase type tumor M2), CA19-9 and CEA in patients with benign, malignant and metastasizing pancreatic lesions. Anticancer Res 1999;19:849-51.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Lüftner D, Mesterharm J, Akrivakis C, Geppert R, Petrides PE, Wernecke KD, et al. Tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase expression in advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2000;20:5077-82.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Mazurek S, Zwerschke W, Jansen-Dürr P, Eigenbrodt E. Metabolic cooperation between different oncogenes during cell transformation: Interaction between activated ras and HPV-16 E7. Oncogene 2001;20:6891-8.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Zwerschke W, Mazurek S, Massimi P, Banks L, Eigenbrodt E, Jansen-Dürr P. Modulation of type M2 pyruvate kinase activity by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:1291-6.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Christofk HR, Vander Heiden MG, Wu N, Asara JM, Cantley LC. Pyruvate kinase M2 is a phosphotyrosine-binding protein. Nature 2008;452:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Ye J, Mancuso A, Tong X, Ward PS, Fan J, Rabinowitz JD, et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 promotes de novo serine synthesis to sustain mTORC1 activity and cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:6904-9.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Psychogios N, Hau DD, Peng J, Guo AC, Mandal R, Bouatra S, et al. The human serum metabolome. PLoS One 2011;6:e16957.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Mashimo T, Pichumani K, Vemireddy V, Hatanpaa KJ, Singh DK, Sirasanagandla S, et al. Acetate is a bioenergetic substrate for human glioblastoma and brain metastases. Cell 2014;159:1603-14.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: Metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab 2008;7:11-20.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Locasale JW, Cantley LC, Vander Heiden MG. Cancer's insatiable appetite. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:916-7.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Luo J, Solimini NL, Elledge SJ. Principles of cancer therapy: Oncogene and non-oncogene addiction. Cell 2009;136:823-37.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Tennant DA, Durán RV, Gottlieb E. Targeting metabolic transformation for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10:267-77.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Linardou H, Dahabreh IJ, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Murray S. Somatic EGFR mutations and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009;6:352-66.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Normanno N, Tejpar S, Morgillo F, De Luca A, Van Cutsem E, Ciardiello F. Implications for KRAS status and EGFR-targeted therapies in metastatic CRC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009;6:519-27.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Yun J, Rago C, Cheong I, Pagliarini R, Angenendt P, Rajagopalan H, et al. Glucose deprivation contributes to the development of KRAS pathway mutations in tumor cells. Science 2009;325:1555-9.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Yuneva M, Zamboni N, Oefner P, Sachidanandam R, Lazebnik Y. Deficiency in glutamine but not glucose induces MYC-dependent apoptosis in human cells. J Cell Biol 2007;178:93-105.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Clem B, Telang S, Clem A, Yalcin A, Meier J, Simmons A, et al. Small-molecule inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase activity suppresses glycolytic flux and tumor growth. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:110-20.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Le A, Cooper CR, Gouw AM, Dinavahi R, Maitra A, Deck LM, et al. Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and inhibits tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:2037-42.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Engelman JA, Chen L, Tan X, Crosby K, Guimaraes AR, Upadhyay R, et al. Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med 2008;14:1351-6.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Zhou R, Vander Heiden MG, Rudin CM. Genotoxic exposure is associated with alterations in glucose uptake and metabolism. Cancer Res 2002;62:3515-20.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: Epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:579-91.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Pollak M. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:915-28.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
Wellen KE, Thompson CB. Cellular metabolic stress: Considering how cells respond to nutrient excess. Mol Cell 2010;40:323-32.  Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.
Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1625-38.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.
Jee SH, Ohrr H, Sull JW, Yun JE, Ji M, Samet JM. Fasting serum glucose level and cancer risk in Korean men and women. JAMA 2005;293:194-202.  Back to cited text no. 80
    
81.
Weiser MA, Cabanillas ME, Konopleva M, Thomas DA, Pierce SA, Escalante CP, et al. Relation between the duration of remission and hyperglycemia during induction chemotherapy for acute lymphocytic leukemia with a hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone/methotrexate-cytarabine regimen. Cancer 2004;100:1179-85.  Back to cited text no. 81
    
82.
Meyerhardt JA, Catalano PJ, Haller DG, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Benson AB 3rd, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes in patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:433-40.  Back to cited text no. 82
    
83.
Maestu I, Pastor M, Gómez-Codina J, Aparicio J, Oltra A, Herranz C, et al. Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in small-cell lung cancer: A new prognostic index and validation of three known prognostic indices on 341 patients. Ann Oncol 1997;8:547-53.  Back to cited text no. 83
    
84.
Eschwège E, Balkau B. Hyperglycaemia: Link to excess mortality. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2001;123:3-6.  Back to cited text no. 84
    
85.
Evans JM, Donnelly LA, Emslie-Smith AM, Alessi DR, Morris AD. Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ 2005;330:1304-5.  Back to cited text no. 85
    
86.
Bowker SL, Majumdar SR, Veugelers P, Johnson JA. Increased cancer-related mortality for patients with type 2 diabetes who use sulfonylureas or insulin: Response to Farooki and Schneider. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1990-1.  Back to cited text no. 86
    
87.
Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D, Koo SH, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA, et al. The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science 2005;310:1642-6.  Back to cited text no. 87
    
88.
Kaira K, Sunose Y, Ohshima Y, Ishioka NS, Arakawa K, Ogawa T, et al. Clinical significance of L-type amino acid transporter 1 expression as a prognostic marker and potential of new targeting therapy in biliary tract cancer. BMC Cancer 2013;13:482.  Back to cited text no. 88
    
89.
Wang Q, Tiffen J, Bailey CG, Lehman ML, Ritchie W, Fazli L, et al. Targeting amino acid transport in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Effects on cell cycle, cell growth, and tumor development. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1463-73.  Back to cited text no. 89
    
90.
Wang JB, Erickson JW, Fuji R, Ramachandran S, Gao P, Dinavahi R, et al. Targeting mitochondrial glutaminase activity inhibits oncogenic transformation. Cancer Cell 2010;18:207-19.  Back to cited text no. 90
    
91.
Seltzer MJ, Bennett BD, Joshi AD, Gao P, Thomas AG, Ferraris DV, et al. Inhibition of glutaminase preferentially slows growth of glioma cells with mutant IDH1. Cancer Res 2010;70:8981-7.  Back to cited text no. 91
    
92.
Emadi A, Jun SA, Tsukamoto T, Fathi AT, Minden MD, Dang CV. Inhibition of glutaminase selectively suppresses the growth of primary acute myeloid leukemia cells with IDH mutations. Exp Hematol 2014;42:247-51.  Back to cited text no. 92
    
93.
Potten CS, Kellett M, Rew DA, Roberts SA. Proliferation in human gastrointestinal epithelium using bromodeoxyuridine in vivo: Data for different sites, proximity to a tumour, and polyposis coli. Gut 1992;33:524-9.  Back to cited text no. 93
    
94.
Rew DA, Wilson GD. Cell production rates in human tissues and tumours and their significance. Part II: Clinical data. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000;26:405-17.  Back to cited text no. 94
    
95.
Chen K, Liu J, Heck S, Chasis JA, An X, Mohandas N. Resolving the distinct stages in erythroid differentiation based on dynamic changes in membrane protein expression during erythropoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:17413-8.  Back to cited text no. 95
    
96.
Macintyre AN, Gerriets VA, Nichols AG, Michalek RD, Rudolph MC, Deoliveira D, et al. The glucose transporter Glut1 is selectively essential for CD4 T cell activation and effector function. Cell Metab 2014;20:61-72.  Back to cited text no. 96
    
97.
Michalek RD, Gerriets VA, Jacobs SR, Macintyre AN, MacIver NJ, Mason EF, et al. Cutting edge: Distinct glycolytic and lipid oxidative metabolic programs are essential for effector and regulatory CD4+T cell subsets. J Immunol 2011;186:3299-303.  Back to cited text no. 97
    
98.
Caro-Maldonado A, Wang R, Nichols AG, Kuraoka M, Milasta S, Sun LD, et al. Metabolic reprogramming is required for antibody production that is suppressed in anergic but exaggerated in chronically BAFF-exposed B cells. J Immunol 2014;192:3626-36.  Back to cited text no. 98
    
99.
Takenaka M, Noguchi T, Sadahiro S, Hirai H, Yamada K, Matsuda T, et al. Isolation and characterization of the human pyruvate kinase M gene. Eur J Biochem 1991;198:101-6.  Back to cited text no. 99
    
100.
Christofk HR, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Ramanathan A, Gerszten RE, Wei R, et al. The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth. Nature 2008;452:230-3.  Back to cited text no. 100
    
101.
Raimundo N, Baysal BE, Shadel GS. Revisiting the TCA cycle: Signaling to tumor formation. Trends Mol Med 2011;17:641-9.  Back to cited text no. 101
    
102.
Choo AY, Kim SG, Vander Heiden MG, Mahoney SJ, Vu H, Yoon SO, et al. Glucose addiction of TSC null cells is caused by failed mTORC1-dependent balancing of metabolic demand with supply. Mol Cell 2010;38:487-99.  Back to cited text no. 102
    
103.
Chen V, Shtivelman E. CC3/TIP30 regulates metabolic adaptation of tumor cells to glucose limitation. Cell Cycle 2010;9:4941-53.  Back to cited text no. 103
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,615 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Nutrient Suffici...
    Adaptation to Nu...
    Therapeutic Pros...
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1299    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded224    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007