Home About us Editorial board Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact Us Login 
An Official Publication of the Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 183-188
 

Histopathological correlation of oral squamous cell carcinoma among younger and older patients


1 Division of Oral Pathology and Oral Biology, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission11-Oct-2013
Date of Acceptance30-Jul-2014
Date of Web Publication17-Sep-2014

Correspondence Address:
Syed Mukith Ur Rahaman
Head of Division of Oral Pathology and Biology, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, P.O. 31906, Al Mahjar, Jeddah - 21418, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-029X.140734

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Background: Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is commonly noted in elder men, when occurring in younger individuals, its aggression and prognosis is questioned due to biased data in literature. Traditionally, various histopathological grading systems have been used for assessing aggression and prognosis of OSCC. However, multifactorial grading of Anneroth et al., is considered effective. Materials and Methods: In this retro-prospective study, files of 75 OSCC patients were retrieved from Oral Pathology Department; among this 50 patients were >40 years and 25 patients were ≤40 years of age. Archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks of these patients were used to prepare hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) stained sections for grading OSCC based on Broder's and Anneroth et al., criteria. Further, recurrence of OSCC among study subjects within 5 years of treatment was evaluated. Chi-square test was used to compare the disease in patients who were >40 years with ≤40 years. Results: Comparison according to Broder's classification didn't show any relevant variation. Three of the six parameters and overall grading according to Anneroth et al., criteria showed statistically higher grades of OSCC in the younger age-group; however, there was no significant difference in 5-year recurrence rate. Interpretation and Conclusion: Results of the study are suggestive of aggressive OSCC among young patients when compared to older. Conversely, this aggression didn't affect the recurrence in younger patients. Further studies on genetics, diet and demographics of patients below 40 years of age affected by OSCC will be of greater value.


Keywords: Anneroth et al. grading, multifactorial histopathological grading, oral squamous cell carcinoma, young patients


How to cite this article:
Ur Rahaman SM, Ahmed Mujib B R. Histopathological correlation of oral squamous cell carcinoma among younger and older patients. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2014;18:183-8

How to cite this URL:
Ur Rahaman SM, Ahmed Mujib B R. Histopathological correlation of oral squamous cell carcinoma among younger and older patients. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2017 Dec 15];18:183-8. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2014/18/2/183/140734



   Introduction Top


Oral cancer is one of the most familiar forms of cancers in the Indian subcontinent. [1],[2] From the beginning of twentieth-century, frequency of oral cancer is known to be high in India. [3] Histopathologically, over 95% of oral cancers are squamous cell carcinomas. [1],[4] Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is more commonly noted in men usually above 40 years of age [5] and only about 0.4 to 3.9% of the patients are affected by OSCC earlier than 40 years. [6]

Controversies exist in literature regarding aggression and prognosis of OSCC among young patients (below 40 years of age). [5] General view is that OSCC among young patients is more aggressive and has worse prognosis. [7],[8],[9] Few studies suggest that 5-year survival rate of patients below 40 years is better than that of patients above 40 years [10],[11],[12] and some other authors state that young patients have a similar clinical course and their survival rate is no different from other age-groups. [13],[14],[15]

Various histopathological grading systems of OSCC have been discussed in literature and Broder's grading has been popular since a long time. [16],[17] Advances in diagnostic technology has led to introduction of multifactorial histopathological grading systems such as Anneroth et al's grading system, which is considered appropriate since it provides valuable diagnostic and predictive information of OSCC. [18],[19] This study attempts to evaluate aggression of OSCC histopathologically by both Broder's and Anneroth et al's., (1987) grading in patients above forty and below forty years of age. Furthermore, an attempt is made to assess the prognosis of OSCC in younger patients by matching 5-year recurrence rate among patients >40 years with ≤40 years age-group.


   Materials and methods Top


Files of the patients reported with OSCC from 1997 to 2005 were retrieved from the records section of the Department of Oral Pathology of a Dental Institution in India. Only those patients whose archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded specimens were available for further processing were considered for this study. Patients who didn't take treatments, who had other systemic diseases and who were diagnosed with histopathological variants of OSCC were excluded from the study.

Final number of patients in the study was 75 of which 50 patients were >40 years of age were randomly selected to make group-I and 25 patients who were ≤40 years of age were similarly selected to make group-II. More patients in the elder group were used to increase the statistical power for comparison. Archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks of these patients were subjected to soft tissue microtomy for preparation of 5 μm thick tissue specimens. Subsequently they were stained by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) and microscopic examination was carried out for the purpose of histopathological grading based on

  • Broder's criteria to classify as well-differentiated squamous-cell carcinoma (WDSCC), moderately differentiated squamous-cell carcinoma (MDSCC) and poorly differentiated squamous-cell carcinoma (PDSCC)
  • Anneroth et al., (1987) criteria which include six parameters assessing are as follows:
    • Tumor cell population: Degree of keratinization, nuclear polymorphism and mitotic figures [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
    • Tumor-host relation: Pattern of invasion, depth of invasion and lympho-plasmacytic infiltration [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]. Each parameter was graded from 1-4 based on severity. [18] Further, individual patients were given an overall grade using the sum total grades of six parameters and classified into one of the following three grades; grade I: 6-12, grade II: 13-18 and grade III: 19-24. [19],[20]
Figure 1: Photomicrograph showing grade 1 keratinization of OSCC according to Anneroth et al., criteria (H&E stain, ×50)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Photomicrograph showing grade 2 nuclear polymorphism of OSCC according to Anneroth et al., criteria (H&E stain, ×400)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Photomicrograph showing grade 2 mitotic figures of OSCC according to Anneroth et al., criteria (H&E stain, ×1000)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Photomicrograph showing grade 1 mode of invasion of OSCC according to Anneroth et al., criteria (H&E stain, ×100)

Click here to view
Figure 5: Photomicrograph showing grade 3 depths of invasion of OSCC according to Anneroth et al., criteria (H&E stain, ×100)

Click here to view
Figure 6: Photomicrograph showing grade 3 Lympho-plasmacytic Infiltrate of OSCC according to Anneroth et al., criteria (H&E stain, ×50)

Click here to view


Recurrence of OSCC among study subjects within five years of treatment was also evaluated. Recurrent lesions are those, which showed local reappearance of OSCC or cervical lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis after treatment of the initial lesion. Comparison of all the parameters between group-I (>40 years) and group-II (≤40 years) was carried out statistically using Chi-square test.


   Results Top


Distribution of study subjects according to Broder's classification is shown in [Table 1]; OSCC comparison between the younger and older group of patients didn't demonstrate any relevant difference. According to Anneroth et al.'s six histopathological parameters, three parameters showed significant difference between the age-groups. Consequently, overall grading also showed similar difference. All the parameters which exhibited variations were in higher grades among younger age group ([Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]).
Table 1: Distribution of study subjects according to Broder's criteria


Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of subjects according to Anneroth et al., criteria - tumor cell population


Click here to view
Table 3: Distribution of subjects according to Anneroth et al., criteria tumor host relationship


Click here to view
Table 4: Distribution of study subjects according to overall grade from six parameters


Click here to view


Total number of patients reported with recurrence in 5 years was 17 out of 75 irrespective of the age-groups. Comparison of 5 years recurrence rate between group-I and group-II didn't appear statistically significant [Table 5] 24% of patients showed recurrence in group-I as against 20% in group-II.
Table 5: Distribution of study subjects according to recurrence in five years


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


While oral cancer accounts for only 2% of all malignancies in UK and USA, [21] it is one of the most common cancers in South East Asia, [2] and in India the incidence is as high as one third of all malignancies. [22],[23] About 95% of oral cancers are squamous-cell carcinomas [1],[4] and are commonly seen in elder adults (>40 years). [6] There is a long-standing debate over the aggression and prognosis of OSCC in young patients as compared to older patients and studies have suggested the need for additional research on this topic. [5]

Comparison of OSCC between younger and older age-groups in this study according to Broder's classification didn't show any significant difference. Most of the patients among young age groups were diagnosed with MDSCC (40%) followed by WDSCC (36%) and PDSCC (24%). Reports of similar studies such as Sasaki et al., in UK [5] , Farnaz et al., in Iran, [24] and Iype et al., in India [25] suggest WDSCC as the most common type of OSCC followed by MDSCC and PDSCC. The difference between WDSCC and MDSCC cases in these studies and the present study is only nominal suggesting that the common histopathological type of OSCC is either WDSCC or MDSCC irrespective of age.

Broder's grading of OSCC is a time-honored pathologic tool, [26] but it is slowly expelled from the standard therapeutic planning strategies due to lack of consensus regarding its prognostic value. [27],[28] Hence, grading of OSCC based only on Broder's criteria will be inconsistent and therefore needs to be reconfirmed with other acknowledged systems. There are various advanced grading systems of OSCC proclaiming to be better than Broder's but most of them are done at molecular level and are expensive [29],[30] therefore difficult to adopt in low socioeconomic strata where the incidence of this disease is high. [19] However histopathologic grading that is sensitive and provides valuable diagnostic information that can effectively be applied in the pastoral areas of Indian subcontinent is suggested by Anneroth et al. [18]

In the present study three of the six parameters according to Anneroth et al., criteria showed statistically significant difference between the younger and older groups. Differences in nuclear polymorphism, mitosis index and depth of invasion were more obvious in higher grades among young patients when compared to old patients. A study by Sasaki et al., (2005) [5] used five of the six parameters of Anneroth et al., excluding nuclear polymorphism and found no significant difference between the age-groups.

Furthermore, when the overall grades of Anneroth et al., parameters were evaluated maximum number of patients in study irrespective of age-groups fell under grade 2 (54.66%) followed by grade 1 (40%) and grade 3 (5.33%). Similar trends were reported by Akhter et al., [19] and Doshi et al. [20] Likewise, statistically significant difference in overall Anneroth et al., parameters were also noted with higher grades of disease among the young patients. Studies describe that the histopathological parameters of Anneroth et al., are key indicators of tumor aggressiveness and prognostication since they reflect the relationship of the tumor with the host, [5],[31] based on this our results are reminiscent of greater aggression of OSCC in younger patients when compared to the older.

Five-year recurrence rate irrespective of age in the study was lesser compared to other studies and the number of reported recurrences didn't show much variation between the groups. Pitman et al., (2000) have reported that 45% of their patients showed recurrence in 3 years period with older as well as younger age-groups showing equivalent distribution. [32] Similarly Pytinia et al., (2004) in their study on disease-free survival rates of patients <40 years and >40 years of age have not come across any difference. [33] Conversely, Lacy et al., (2000) have reported higher number of older patients with 5-years recurrence in their study (56% of older patients compare to 35% of younger patients). [34] These results are indicative of either similar or better survival rate for younger patients when compared to older.


   Conclusion Top


Outcomes of the study are evocative of more aggressive OSCC in younger patients which didn't affect the recurrence rate when compared with older patients. The question that needs to be answered is the actual relationship of aggression and prognosis of OSCC among young individuals when compared with old individuals. Hence, further studies and research on genetics, diet, demographics and tumor host factors will be of a greater value to unveil the reason associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma affecting younger patients.


   Acknowledgements Top


Mr. Javali, Department of Biostatistics, SDM Dental College, Dharwad. Dr. Keerthi Kumar Rai, Prof and Head, Department of Oral Surgery, Bapuji Dental College, Davangere. Dr. Shabbir Ahmed Sayeed, Head of General requirements, Ibn Sina National College and Hospital, Jeddah, KSA.

 
   References Top

1.Moore SR, Johnson NW, Pierce AM, Wilson DF. The epidemiology of mouth cancer: A review of global incidence. Oral Dis 2000;6:65-74.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Control of oral cancer in developing countries. A WHO meeting. Bull World Health Organ 1984;62:817-30.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Gupta PC, Nandakumar A. Guest editorial: Oral cancer scene in India. Oral Dis 1999;5:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.John G Batsakis. The histology of oral cancer. In: Shah JP, Johnson NW, Batsakis JG, editors. Oral cancer. London: Martin Duntiz; 2003.p. 129-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Sasaki T, Moles DR, Imai Y, Speight PM. Clinico-pathological features of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in patients <40 years of age. J Oral Pathol Med 2005;34:129-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Cuasumano RJ, Persky MS. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx in young adults. Head Neck Surg 1988;10:229-34.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Vargas H, Pitman KT, Johnson JT, Galati LT. More aggressive behavior of squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior tongue in young women. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1623-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Sarkaria JN, Harari PM. Oral tongue cancer in young adults less than 40 years of age: Rationale for aggresive therapy. Head Neck 1994;16:107-11.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Kuriakose M, Sankaranarayan M, Nair MK. Comparison of oral squamous cell carcinoma in younger and older patients in India. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1992;28:113-20.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Schantz SP, Yu GP. Head and neck cancer incidence trends in young Americans 1973-1997 with a special analysis for tongue cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:268-70.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Yamazaki H, Inoue T, Koizumi M, Yoshida K, Kagawa K, Shimomi H, et al. Age as a prognostic factor for late local recurrence of early tongue cancer treated with brachytherapy. Anticancer Res 1997;17:4709-12.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Davidson BJ, Root WA, Trock BJ. Age and survival from squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue. Head Neck 2001;23:273-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Siegelman-Danieli N, Hanlon A, Ridge JA, Padmore R, Fien DA, Langer CJ. Oral tongue cancer in patients less than 45 years old: Institutional experience comparison with older patients. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:745-53.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Atula S, Greman R, Laippala P, Syrjanen S. Cancer of the tongue in patients younger than 40 years of age. A distinct entity? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;16:107-11.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.McGregor AD, Rennie JS. Intra oral squamous cell carcinoma in patients under 40 years of age. A report of 13 cases and review of literature. Br J Plast Surg 1987;40:270-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Rajendran R. Benign and malignant tumors of oral cavity. In: Rajendra R, Shivapathasundaram B, editors. Shafer's Text Book of Oral Pathology. 5 th ed. New Delhi: Reed Elsevier India Private Limited; 2006. p. 143-78.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.The genetic and molecular basis of head and neck cancer. In: Shah JP, Patel SG, editors. Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology. 3 rd ed. London: Mosby Elsevier Limited; 2003. p. 679-93.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Review of literature and recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:229-49.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Akhter M, Hossain S, Rahman QB, Molla MR. A study on histological grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma and its co-relationship with regional metastasis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2011;15:168-76.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
20.Doshi NP, Shah SA, Patel KB, Jhabuawala MF. Histological grading of oral cancer: A comparison of different systems and their relation to lymph node metastasis. National Journal of Community Medicine 2011;2:136-42.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Cawson RA and Odel EW. Oral Cancer. In: Cawson RA, Odel EW, editors. Essentials of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine. 8 th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.p. 277-90.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Henk JM. Malignant Tumors of the Oral Cavity (Management of Malignant Diseases. Series). In: Langdon JD, editor. London: Edward Arnold; 1986. p. 2-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Shankarnarayan R. Oral cancer in India: A clinical and epidemiological review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:325-30.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Falaki F, Dalirsani Z, Pakfetrat A, Falaki A, Saghravanian N, Nosratzehi T, et al. Clinical and histopathological analysis of oral squamous cell carcinoma of young patient in Mashhad, Iran: A retrospective study and review of literatures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e473-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Iype EM, Pandey M, Mathew A, Thomas G, Sebastian P, Nair MK. Oral cancer among patients under the age of 35 years. J Postgrad Med 2001;47:171-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
26.Langdon JD, Henk JM. Classification and staging. In: Langdon JD, Henk JM. Malignant tumors of the mouth, jaws and salivary glands. 2 nd ed. London: Edward Arnold;1995.p. 36-49.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Roland NJ, Caslin AW, Nash J, Stell PM. Value of grading squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 1992;14:224-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Langdon JD, Patridge M. Expression of the tumor suppression gene p53 in oral cancers. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:214-20.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Kearslay JH, Furlong KL, Cooke RA, Waters MJ. An immunohistochemical assessment of cellular proliferation markers in head and neck squamous cell cancers. Br J Cancer 1990;61:821-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Tytor M, Frazen G, Olafsson J. DNA ploidy in oral cavity carcinomas with special reference to prognosis. Head Neck 1989;11:257-63.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Dantas DD, Ramos CC, Costa AL, Souza LB, Pinto LP. Clinical-pathological parameters in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Braz Dent J 2003;14:22-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Pitman KT, Johnson JT, Wagner RL, Myers EN. Cancer of the tongue in patients less than forty. Head Neck 2000;22:297-302.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Pytynia KB, Grant JR, Etzel CJ, Roberts D, Wei Q, Sturgis EM. Matched analysis of survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck diagnosed before and after 40 years of age. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:869-73.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Lacy PD, Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG, Zequeire MR. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Better to be young. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:253-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
            

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,829 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgements
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1166    
    Printed27    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded302    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th Aug, 2007