|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 149-152
Hyalohyphomycosis of maxillary antrum
Sachin Rai1, Rajiv Tiwari2, Simarpreet V Sandhu3, Yuvika Rajkumar1
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Moga Road, Ferozepur, Punjab, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Moga Road, Ferozepur, Punjab, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Moga Road, Ferozepur, Punjab, India
|Date of Web Publication||17-Feb-2012|
Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Fungal infection of the paranasal sinuses is an increasingly recognized entity, both in normal and immunocompromised individuals. The recent increase in mycotic nasal and paranasal infections is due to both improved diagnostic research and an increase in the conditions that favor fungal infection. Although fungal infections of the paranasal sinus are uncommon, 3-5% of incidence is reported. Aspergillus, Candida, and Mucor species are the most common causative agents of fungal sinusitis, but infection with lesser known species have been reported across the world infrequently. This article reviews and presents a case report of chronic fungal sinusitis in an immunocompetent adult male infected with two species of Hyalohyphomycosis group namely, Paecilomyces and Scopulariopsis which are opportunistic soil saprophytes, uncommon to humans.
Keywords: Fungal sinusitis, hyalohyphomycosis, mycosis, opportunistic infection
|How to cite this article:|
Rai S, Tiwari R, Sandhu SV, Rajkumar Y. Hyalohyphomycosis of maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2012;16:149-52
|How to cite this URL:|
Rai S, Tiwari R, Sandhu SV, Rajkumar Y. Hyalohyphomycosis of maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2016 May 6];16:149-52. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2012/16/1/149/92996
| Introduction|| |
Fungal infection of the paranasal sinuses with uncommon species is an increasingly recognized entity, both in normal and immunocompromised individuals. , The pattern of fungal infection of the sinuses can be divided into invasive, noninvasive, and semi-invasive based on the presence of fungal hyphae in the tissue with associated granulomatous reaction or tissue necrosis [Table 1].  Although fungal infections of the paranasal sinus are uncommon, 3-5% of cultured sinus samples are positive for fungi.  Aspergillus species are the most common causative agents of fungal sinusitis followed by Candida and Mucor.  Hyalohyphomycosis (Gk. Hylos-glass) is an infection caused by a number of species in which the basic tissue form of fungi is hyaline without any pigment in their cell wall. Important human pathogens of this clinical entity are Pseudallescheria, Fusarium, and Penicillium species. The disease may present as cutaneous, subcutaneous or systemic infection in the immunocompetent or immunocompromised patients.  This article presents a case report of maxillary sinus hyalohyphomycosis caused by two opportunistic soil saprophytes of Paecilomyces and Scopulariopsis species.
| Case Report|| |
A 40-year-old adult male reported to the outpatient department with the chief complaint of a firm mass in the left cheek region. The duration of the swelling was approximately 6 months and the growth was continuous, slow, and painless. The patient was a farmer by profession and had no history of illness. On further probing, the patient gave the history of decay and infection in the left maxillary second molar a year ago. He underwent an unwarranted and irregular course of antibiotics and other drugs for almost 2-3 months prescribed by traditional practitioners in his village followed by extraction. The swelling appeared on the left cheek after approximately 2 months of extraction.
On examination, the swelling was firm, nontender, sessile, mobile and oval in shape. It measured 4 × 3 cm and was not fixed to the surrounding soft tissue. There was no paraesthesia over the distribution of infraorbital nerve and the overlying skin was unaffected. Intraorally, the left maxillary teeth were vital on pulp testing with no periapical radiolucency in dental radiographs.
Radiology and clinical diagnosis
An occipito-mental view (OMV) of skull showed generalized opacification of the left maxillary sinus. The computerized tomography (CT) scan showed evidence of well-defined, homogeneously enhancing soft tissue mass lesion seen in the left maxillary sinus [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. No evidence of any necrosis or calcification was seen. The lesion was causing lytic destruction of anterior wall of the sinus and also the erosion of left floor of orbit. However, no intraorbital/intracranial extension was noted. Nasal septum was deviated mildly toward the right with relative inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Routine hematological evaluation showed mild leucocytosis with eosinophilia and an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [Table 2]. The chest x-ray was normal. A differential diagnosis of a chronic sinusitis, benign cyst or tumor, and maxillary antrum mycosis was made, and an incisional biopsy was performed under local anesthesia. The pathological tissue was creamish in color, firm in consistency, and hyalinized in texture [Figure 3].
Histopathological and microbiological findings
The histopathological picture showed diffuse areas of fibrosis and granulation tissue with patchy infiltrate of acute and chronic inflammatory cells. There were few septate organisms, giant cells, macrophages, epitheloid cells, and foci of hemorrhage. The report was suggestive of a fungal granuloma. Microbiological studies included KOH (potassium hydroxide) wet mount, LCB (Lactophenol Cotton Blue) preparation, and culture on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (SDA). Growth on SDA showed two types of colonies. One thin and white at first and then became gray tan in color and second golden colored, fast growing and powdery. Microscopic finding in the first culture showed chains of single-celled conidia produced in basipetal succession from annellide (basocatenate). Annellide were solitary with globose, truncate, smooth, and brown colored conidia [Figure 4]. Microscopic finding of second colony showed conidiophores bearing dense, verticillately arranged branches bearing phialides. Phialides were ellipsoidal tapering abruptly into long cylindrical neck. Conidia were spherical, smooth walled, yellowish, and in long divergent chains. Chlamydospores were present in short chains, brown, sub spherical and thick walled [Figure 5]. Based on all these findings, the isolates were identified as Paecilomyces and Scopulariopsis species.
|Figure 4: Pictomicrograph showing Paecilomyces species (KOH ×10 × ×40 magnification) having elongated and tapering phialides with ovoid conidia in basipetal succession|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Pictomicrograph showing Scopulariopsis species (KOH ×10 × ×40 magnification) having basipetal globose to pyriform conidia on annellides (solitary and in groups)|
Click here to view
Further course of treatment
The patient was put on oral itraconazole 200 mg twice daily for a week which resulted in a significant reduction of the extraoral swelling. A thorough sinus debridement and lavage was planned under general anesthesia. The sinus was approached by the standard Caldwell-Luc method because of the evident bony erosion of the anterior wall which had to be removed simultaneously [Figure 6]. A plastic drain was fixed oroantrally for irrigation after sinus clearance. In the postoperative phase, the patient was again put on oral itraconazole 200 mg twice daily and the sinus was irrigated with 1% acetic acid once daily for 7 days. The patient is been followed regularly for the last 1 year and a check OMV x-ray of skull confirmed repneumatization of the left maxillary sinus with complete resolution of clinical sign and symptoms.
| Discussion|| |
Chronic indolent fungal sinusitis can occur in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individual and was first described by Hora in 1965.  It is mostly invasive and is characterized histologically by a chronic granulomatous inflammation surrounding broken fungal hyphae. This type of fungal sinusitis may extend beyond the bony confines of the sinuses to the orbit or even to the anterior cranial fossa. Therefore, clinically it may mimic a malignant neoplasm, Wegener's granulomatosis, osteomylitis, tuberculosis, and rhinoscleroma. Paranasal sinus mycoses are common in north India, northern Sudan, and south-western states of the North America which have warm and humid climate. 
Saprophytic fungi are ubiquitous and omnipresent in nature, mostly surviving on dead organic plant matter. Some species survive as commensals within the body cavities of humans, including the nose and paranasal sinuses.  When a favorable situation (immunocompromised status) arises as in prolonged steroid or antibiotic therapy or postsurgical exposure of raw areas, these dimorphic fungi metamorphosize into invasive forms and present themselves in a panoramic spectrum of clinical manifestations [Table 3].  An unwarranted and uncontrolled misuse of drugs, especially antibiotics, steroids, and antihistamines, in semi-urban and rural population is an important factor to contribute to this disease in developing countries such as India. The maxillary and ethmoid sinuses are more commonly involved because drainage depends on mucocilliary propagation in these sites.
During the recent decades, paranasal sinus mycosis has been recognized more frequently in different parts of the world mainly because of the following reasons: (1) increased awareness among clinicians; (2) improved diagnostic tools; and (3) increased host susceptibility. , Successful treatment of such indolent mycotic infections largely depends on the accurate identification of the pathogen and early, appropriate intervention by surgical debridement and sinus ventilation, supported with antifungal medications as per standardized regimen.
| References|| |
|1.||Ellison MD, Hung RT, Harris K, Campbell BH. Report of the first case of invasive fungal sinusitis caused by Scopulariopsis acremonium: Review of scopulariopsis infections. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:1014-6. |
|2.||Nayak DR, Balakrishanan R, Nainanai S, Siddique S. Paecilomyces fungal infection of the paranasal sinuses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000;52:183-7. |
|3.||deShazo RD, O'Brien M, Chapin K, Soto-Aguilar M, Gardner L, Swain R. A new classification and diagnostic criteria for invasive fungal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:1181-8. |
|4.||Grewal RS, Khurana S, Aujla KS, Goyal SC. Incidence of fungal infections in chronic maxillary sinusitis. Indian J Pathol Micobiol 1990;33:339-43. |
|5.||deShazo RD, Chapin K, Swain RE. Fungal sinusitis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:254-9. |
|6.||Ajello L. Hyalohyphomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis: Two global disease entities of public health importance. Eur J Epidemiol 1986;2:243-51. |
|7.||Hora JF. Primary aspergillosis of the paranasal sinuses and associated areas. Laryngoscope 1965;75:768-73. |
|8.||Chakrabarty A, Sharma SC, Chandler J. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of paranasal sinus mycoses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:745-50. |
|9.||El-Gindy AA, Saad RR. Fungi of virgin and cultivated soil of Salhiah desert, Egypt. Zentralbl Mikrobiol 1990;145:547-51. |
|10.||Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, Bennett JE, Bille J, Crokaert F, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: An international consensus. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:7-14. |
|11.||deShazo RD, O'Brien M, Chapin K, Soto-Aguilar M, Gardner L, Swain R. A new classification and diagnostic criteria for invasive fungal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:1181-8. |
|12.||Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, Bennett JE, Bille J, Crokaert F, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: An international consensus. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:7-14. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Evaluation and treatment of isolated maxillary sinus disease
| ||Stephens, J.C. and Saleh, H.A. |
| ||Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2013; 21(1): 50-57 |