|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 2-8
Candida and calcofluor white: Study in precancer and cancer
Rashmi Santosh Kumar1, SM Ganvir2, VK Hazarey2
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Narketpalli - 508254, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, GDC and H Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Rashmi Santosh Kumar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Narketpalli - 508 254, Andhra Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: The interest in oral candidosis has waxed and waned from the period of Hippocrates. The acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic has certainly bolstered these figures on oral candidosis, with diabetes and oral cancer being no exception. A need for rapid detection of Candida is made possible by the use of Calcofluor - White (CFW) stain when examined under a fluorescence microscope. The present study was aimed at assessing the efficacy of CFW is compared to Gram stain and periodic acid Schiff (PAS) in detection of Candida in oral precancer and cancer.
Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of patients with precancer (n=45), cancer (n=45), and control group (n=45). Presence of Candida was confirmed by culture inoculation along with a germ tube and carbohydrate fermentation test. The cytopathological smears were analyzed by papanicolaou - CFW and Gram staining, whereas, tissue sections were stained by PAS and CFW staining.
Results: Candida albicans was the predominant species identified. A highly significant association of Candida was seen more often in cancer than in precancer. Both in cytology and histopathology Candida detection by CFW was higher. In precancer it was 48.88% in smears and 40% in tissue sections, whereas, in cancer 60% in smears and 55.55% in histopathology.
Conclusion: Among the various diagnostic tools used in the present study, the use of CFW is seen to be a simple, effective, rapid, and reliable method, both in cytopathology and histopathology.
Keywords: Cancer, Candida , calcofluor white, precancer
|How to cite this article:|
Kumar RS, Ganvir S M, Hazarey V K. Candida and calcofluor white: Study in precancer and cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2009;13:2-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Kumar RS, Ganvir S M, Hazarey V K. Candida and calcofluor white: Study in precancer and cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Aug 6];13:2-8. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2009/13/1/2/44575
| Introduction|| |
Mycotic infections have become a major cause of morbidity and mortality in clinically debilitated or immunocompromised patients.  The co-existence of Candida species within humans either as commensals or pathogens has been a subject of interest, among physicians.  Also the association of Candida with various precancer and cancer lesions has been reported as a causative agent. ,,,
With the increasing importance of candidosis, there is a need for a practical method for identification of fungus. A new technique for the rapid identification of fungi in tissues has been described by Monheit and co-workers. ,,
Calcofluor White (CFW) is a disodium salt of 4,4'-bis-[4anilino-bis-diethyl-amino-S-tri-azin-2-ylamino]-2,2'-stilbene-disulfonic acid, a colorless dye that is used in the textile and paper industries as a whitening agent. ,,
It has the ability to bind to β 1-3, β 1-4 polysaccharides (i.e., cellulose and chitin), and exhibits fluorescence when exposed to long - wavelength ultraviolet and short - wavelength visible light. It has been used as a biological marker to stain the cell walls of plants, and is therefore valuable in delineating fungal elements. 
The use of CFW in clinical mycology was first described by Hageage and Harrington,  and has found extensive use in this area for rapid detection of microorganisms. CFW is a nonspecific fluorochrome stain that binds to fungi, and depending upon the filter system employed, fluoresces either an apple green or blue white color when exposed to ultraviolet light. ,, It can be used on fresh, frozen, fixed, paraffin embedded, and clinical specimens. 
CFW has also been incorporated in the Papanicolaou stain procedure, to enhance the recognition of yeasts in smears. 
The study was planned with the following aims and objectives:
- To determine the presence of Candida in oral precancer and cancer patients, using various laboratory tests, such as culture, germ tube (GT) test, and carbohydrate fermentation test.
- To detect Candida in oral precancer and cancer lesions by using CFW staining in cytopathology and in histopathology under a fluorescence microscope.
- To compare the diagnostic efficacy of a cytopathological smear with that of the histological sections.
- To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of the fluorescence microscopic evaluation of a CFW stain used in direct smears and tissue sections.
- To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CFW staining in cytopathology and histopathology, in the detection of Candida as compared to Gram staining and periodic acid schiff (PAS) staining.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The sample for the present clinical study comprised of a total of 135 patients of both sexes. The patients were selected from among those visiting the Outpatient Department of Oral Pathology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur.
The study group comprised of 90 cases of oral precancer and cancer, diagnosed on the basis of clinical and histological features, were selected. The precancer group comprised of oral leukoplakia (OL), oral lichen planus (OLP), and oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). The control group comprised of 45 cases of normal patients. The distribution of study group and controls are tabulated in [Table 1].
A complete medical history was obtained including accompanying systemic conditions, ongoing medication, and prescribed therapy for their lesions.
Specimen collection: Culture inoculation was done for each patient by the swab method. Smears were prepared by scrape cytology using a wooden stick moistened in normal saline. For histopathological examination, a tissue was obtained by using a 7mm punch.
Method of identification: Swabs were inoculated immediately on the Sabouraud's slope. The growth was subcultured on a new slope of Sabouraud's agar and the pure colony was subjected to the GT test and carbohydrate fermentation test [Figure 1],[Figure 2].
For each patient, two smears were prepared on the center of the slide. For the study group, smears were prepared from the lesional site, and for the control group, smears were obtained from the tongue and buccal mucosa of normal healthy individuals.
One of the two smears was air-dried by passing through the flame, two to three times, and was Gram stained and observed under a light microscope where Candida was seen as dark blue colored hyphae and yeasts [Figure 3],[Figure 4]. Another smear was wet-fixed by dipping the slide in 95% ethyl alcohol for one hour and was subsequently stained with papanicolaou (PAP)-CFW staining [Table 2] . 
The CFW solution consisted of a 0.1% (w/v), distilled water solution of (disodium salt of 4.4' -bis - [4 - anilino - bis - diethyl-amino-s-triazin-2ylamino] -2, 2- stilbene - disulefonic acid]. During incorporation of CFW into the PAP - stain sequence, CFW was introduced after acid eosin, as was determined by Monheit in 1986.  When observed under the fluorescence microscope, Candidal hyphae appeared apple green in color, with a dark orange background [Figure 5],[Figure 6].
Clinical photographs were taken in selected cases prior to contemplating the biopsy procedure. Anesthesia was achieved by infiltration / block technique; given away from the biopsy site. Punch biopsies were obtained by using a 7mm punch. For the control group, only one biopsy could be obtained as it was not ethically possible to obtain biopsy from all the 45 normal subjects.
Tissues were processed to obtain the paraffin embedded sections both for PAS and CFW staining. Sections of 5µm were cut from each block, deparaffinized, hydrated to water, and stained with PAS, and observed under light microscope [Table 3]. Candida could be seen in the superficial layer of the epithelium as magenta, red-colored hyphae penetrating the epithelium both vertically and horizontally [Figure 7].
Additional 5µm sections were cut from each block, deparaffinized, hydrated to water, and coverslipped with a solution of 0.1% (w/v) CFW in distilled water containing 0.05% Evans blue More Details as a counter stain to suppress the background fluorescence.  One or two drops of 0.1% CFW was placed on tissue sections on the slides for 1min and then coverslipped and examined microscopically [Table 4],  although the solution was relatively stable it was kept in actinic (red) glassware to prevent photoisomerization and degradation. The procedure was performed under fluorescent room lighting, and slides were immediately placed in cardboard slide holders. All section were examined with a Olympus Fluorescent Microscope equipped with plan achromatic lenses, episcopic-fluorescence attachment BX-FLA, a high-pressure mercury light source and a UV filter cassette containing a 330to 380nm excitation filter, a 400nm dichroic mirror, and a 420nm absorption filter. Candidal hyphae were seen as green to yellow in colour against a background of dark orange background [Figure 8].
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were calculated according to the following formulae: Sensitivity=[a/(a+c)]×100; specificity=[d/(b+d)]×100; positive predictive value =[a/(a+b)]×100; and negative predictive value =[d/(c+d)]×100; where a is the number of true positives, b is the number of false positives, c is the number of false negatives, and d is the number of true negative samples. 
Correlation between the staining procedures was determined by the Kappa test.  The interpretation of results was as follows: If K<0 No agreement; 0-0.19 Poor agreement; 0.20-0.39 Fair agreement; 0.40-0.59 Moderate agreement; 0.60-0.79 Substantial agreement; 0.80-1.00 Almost perfect.
The Z-test evaluated the difference in proportion of cytological smears of Gram and PAP-CFW staining and histopathological staining of PAS and CFW stain. Chi square (χ2 ) test was applied to assess the association between Candida and oral precancer and oral cancer.
| Results|| |
Distribution of males and females among the study and control groups are tabulated in [Table 5]. The mean age of males in the oral precancer and oral cancer groups were lower than that of females [Table 5].
Candidal growth was observed from the primary culture medium of Sabouraud's dextrose agar as smooth, shiny or dull, cream-colored colonies at room temperature, that is, at 37 o C [Figure 1]. Among the 90 samples of study groups, 45 samples (50%) showed Candidal colonies, fulfilling all the diagnostic criteria, whereas, only two samples (4.44%) from the control group were positive for Candidal growth [Table 6].
Among the 45 culture-positive samples of the study group, 39 (86.66%) samples and both culture-positive samples of the control group were GT test positive. By using the carbohydrate fermentation test and GT test, the species identified was predominantly Candida albicans , whereas, the remaining six cases belonged to Candida tropicalis .
Evaluation of cytological smears showed that among that PAP-CFW was more effective in detection of Candida compared to Gram stain [Table 6]. Similarly evaluation of the histopathological sections showed a higher detection rate of Candida by CFW compared to PAS [Table 6].
PAP-CFW staining showed high sensitivity (85.10%) with a high specificity (88.63%) [Figure 9], and a positive predictive value of 80% and negative predictive value of 91.76%. Kappa test (K = 0.7266) suggested substantial agreement of PAP-CFW with culture. Z test (Z = 3.1504) showed a highly significant probability of detection of Candida by PAP-CFW procedure; and K test (k = 0.5138) suggested a moderate agreement between two staining methods.
Sensitivity evaluated by PAS was low (i.e., 66.66%) compared to CFW, but showed a higher specificity (91.11%) [Figure 10], with positive and negative predictive values of 88.23% and 73.21% respectively. K test (k = 0.5777) suggested a substantial agreement of PAS with culture. Sensitivity of CFW was high (82.22%) with a specificity of 86.66% and positive predictive value of 86.04% and negative predictive value of 82.97%. Kappa test (K = 0.6888) suggested substantial agreement of CFW with culture. But Z test (Z = 1.0585) suggested the equivalence of PAS and CFW procedures. K test (K = 0.7519) showed the substantial agreement of both detection methods. Chi square test showed a highly significant association of Candida in both oral precancer (χ2 = 17.386; P <0.001) and oral cancer (χ2 = 25.608; P <0.001).
| Discussion|| |
With the increasing importance of candidosis, there is a need for identification of Candida . The various species can be identified with the help of a germ tube test, identifying characteristic morphology on cornmeal Tween 80 agar and sugar fermentation reactions. But, today there is a need for a rapid detection of Candida , which is made possible by the use of Calcofluor-White under a fluorescence microscope. ,, In the present study, the diagnostic efficacy of CFW in detection of Candida both in cytological smears and histopathological sections as compared to Gram stain and PAS.
In the present study, Candidal colonies were identified on Sabouraud's dextrose agar and species identified using germ tube and carbohydrate fermentation tests. In combination of morphological and biochemical observations, the species identified were predominantly C. albicans . The results were compatible with those of Krogh et al. ,  who found C. albicans to be the dominating species in oral leukoplakia and lichen planus.
Seto (1986)  and Lamey et al. ,  have used Gram stain as a basic stain for microbial identification of Candida . Monheit  introduced the addition of CFW to PAP stain, without altering or destroying the diagnostic cytopathological features, while still allowing the fungi to be identified. The ability to use CFW in this manner allowed pathologists to confirm the presence of fungi without delay. In the present study, CFW was incorporated into the PAP stain after acid eosin and was observed under the fluorescence microscope. PAP-CFW staining showed a sensitivity and specificity of 85.10% and 88.63%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 80% and 91.76%, respectively. Also, higher percentage of Candida was detected with the use of PAP-CFW stain in oral precancer and oral cancer, when compared with that of Gram stain.
Many studies, such as those by Seto,  Fotos et al. ,  and Barrett et al.  recommended the use of PAS stain for the detection of fungi. Cawson  and Cawson and Lehner  demonstrated the presence of Candida in oral Candidal leukoplakia by using PAS was investigated.. In the present study, PAS showed a high specificity (91.11%), and a low sensitivity (66.66%) towards detection of Candida .
Darken  reported that CFW stains fungi. Hageage and Harrington  used CFW to demonstrate hyphae and yeasts in the paraffin-embedded tissues of mycotic lesions and disclosed that CFW, rapidly stains fungi. In the present study, it was observed that CFW had a higher Candidal detection capacity than PAS.
Renstrup  reported 32% of homogenous leukoplakia with no atypia were positive for Candida , whereas, 60% of speckled leukoplakia showed Candida hyphae with cellular atypia. In the present study, although 12 cases of leukoplakia were positive by culture, Gram stain and PAP-CFW stain could detect only seven and eight cases respectively, in cytopathology. Similarly PAS and CFW identified seven and eight cases respectively, in histopathology.
In the present study, culture was positive only in one case of lichen planus for Candida , but Gram stain and PAS were negative for Candida in the same case. However, PAP-CFW and CFW staining of the same case showed the presence of Candida . Although, seven of 24 (29.16%) cases of OSMF cases were culture positive for Candida growth, Gram staining and PAP-CFW staining was positive for Candida in 8 (33.33%) and 13 (54.16%) cases respectively. Similarly, in histopathology, 8 (33.33%) and 9 (37.5) cases were positive for Candida by PAS and CFW staining respectively. The lack of published data on the occurrence of Candida in oral submucous fibrosis makes comparison of our data with other studies difficult.
A statistically significant association has been found between Candida and precancer in the present study (χ2 = 17.386, where P < 0.001). Similarly Candidal association in oral cancer was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Horstein et al. ,  investigated the presence of Candida in oral cancer by mycological culture and found the incidence of oral fungi in 71.5% of oral carcinoma cases. In the present study, 55.55% of oral cancer cases were culture positive, whereas, cytopathology using PAP-CFW revealed the presence of Candida in 60% of oral cancer cases. In tissue microscopy, CFW and PAS revealed the presence of Candida in 55.55% and 42.22% of cases. Association of Candida with leukoplakia has been noted in earlier studies, but its association with oral submucous fibrosis has not been declared in many studies. It needs to be establish the role of Candida in the causation of precancer and oral cancer.
The use of Calcofluor-White stain in Candidal detection, not only has a myriad of advantages like rapid detection, higher sensitivity, and specificity over Gram and PAS staining, but is also a unique stain that can detect Candida both in smears and tissues, without disturbing the cellular details, under the fluorescence microscope.
| Conclusion|| |
As arriving at the diagnosis of Candida is a complex subject, this study evaluates the utility of the Calcofluor-White fluorescence method for easy and rapid diagnosis of Candida , both in cytopathology and histopathology in precancer and cancer. Calcofluor White staining has a number of advantages over traditional methods. The technique is extremely rapid, requiring less than 30 seconds from preparation of hydrated specimen to viewing of the slide. No specific techniques are required other than routine histological processing and it does not disturb the cellular details. CFW staining also does not interfere with the subsequent Gram or PAS staining when required.
However, further study is definitely required to grade the Candida in tissue sections and to find the correlation between presence of Candida and epithelial dysplasia in precancer and cancer cases, as also to determine the nature of Candida ; whether it is one of the causal factors or is it a sole etiological agent for precancer and cancer patients.
| References|| |
|1.||Wiesner SM, Bendel CM, Hess DJ, Erlandsen SL, Wells CL. Adherence of yeast and filamentour forms of Candida albicans to cultured enterocytes. Crit Care Med 2002;30:677-83. |
|2.||Samarnayake LP, MacFarlane TW. Oral candidiosis. Butterworth and Co Publishers Ltd; 1990. |
|3.||Field EA, Field JK, Martin MV. Does Candida have a role in Oral epithelial neoplasia? J Med Vet Mycol 1989;27:277-94. |
|4.||Gerson SJ. Oral Cancer. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1990;13:153-66. |
|5.||Gold JW. Opportunistic fungal in fungal infections in patients with neoplastic disease. Am J Med 1984;76:458-63. |
|6.||Meunier-Carpentier F. Treatment of mycoses in cancer patients. Am J Med 1983;74:74-9. |
|7.||Lynch DP, Gibson DK. The use of Calcofluor white in the histopathologic diagnosis of oral candidiasis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:698-703. |
|8.||Monheit JE, Cowan DF, Moore DG. Rapid detection of fungi in tissues using calcofluor white and fluorescence microscopy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1984;108:616-8. |
|9.||Monheit JG, Brown G, Kott MM, Schmidt WA, Moore DG. Calcofluor white detection of fungi in cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol 1986;85:222-5. |
|10.||Maeda H, Ishida N. Specificity of binding of hexopyranosyl polysaccharids with fluorescent brightness. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1967;62:267-78. |
|11.||Harington BJ, Rasper KB. Use of fluorescent brightener to demonstrate ellulose in ther cellular slime molds. Appl microbial 1968:16;106-13. |
|12.||Hageage GJ, Harrington BJ. Use of calcofluor white in clinical mycology. Lab Med 1984;15;109-12. |
|13.||Harrington BJ, Hageage GJ. Calcofluor white: Tips for improving its use. Clin Microbial News 1991;13:3-5. |
|14.||Mahajan BK. Methods in Biostastics. 4 th ed. Smt. Indu Mahajan Publications; 1984. |
|15.||Krogh P, Homstrup P, Thorn JJ, Vedtofte P, Pindberg JJ. Yeast species and biotypes associated with oral leukoplakia and lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:48-54. |
|16.||Seto BG, Tsutsui P. Invasive Candida albicans infections of the oral cavity in Immunocomprised Patients. J Oral Med 1986;41:9-13. |
|17.||Lamey PJ, Darwazeh AM, Muirhead J, Rennie JS, Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW. Chronic hyperplastic candidosis and secretor status. J Oral Pathol Med 1991;20:64-7. |
|18.||Fotos PG, Vincent SD, Hellstein JW. Oral candidosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:41-9. |
|19.||Barrett AW, Kingsmill VJ, Speight PM. The frequency of infection in biopsies of oral mucosal lesions. Oral Dis 1998;4: 26-31. |
|20.||Cawson RA. Chronic oral candidiasis and leukoplakia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966;22:582-91. |
|21.||Darken MA. Absorption and transport of fluorescent brightners by microorganisms. Appl Microbiol 1962;10:387-93. |
|22.||Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam R, editor, Shafer's textbook of Oral Pathology. 5 th ed. New Delhi; Elsevier A division of Reed Elsevier India Private Limited; 2006. |
|23.||Horstein OP, Grassel R, Schirner E, Schell H. Oral candidiasis in leukoplakia and carcinoma of the oral cavity. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1979;104:1033-6. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]
|This article has been cited by|
||Genome-wide profiling identifies Saccharomyces cerevisiae response in PKC-SLT2 signaling and glycogen metabolic pathways to antifungal compound calcofluor white
| ||Juan Zhou,Chuan-sheng Hu,Xiao-lin Li,Ming Cheng,Yan Guo,Zhi-feng Shao |
| ||Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science). 2014; 19(5): 574 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Anti-Candida albicans activity and pharmacokinetics of pogostone isolated from Pogostemonis Herba
| ||Yu-Cui Li,Hai-Chun Liang,Hai-Ming Chen,Li-Rong Tan,Yu-Yang Yi,Zhen Qin,Wei-Min Zhang,Dian-Wei Wu,Chu-Wen Li,Rong-Feng Lin,Zi-Ren Su,Xiao-Ping Lai |
| ||Phytomedicine. 2012; 20(1): 77 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Efficacy of Fungiflora Y staining for the diagnosis of oral erythematous candidiasis : Fungiflora Y stain for candidiasis
| ||Mariko R. Okamoto, Miho Kamoi, Shigeo Yamachika, Akihisa Tsurumoto, Takahiro Imamura, Ken Yamamoto, Shinichi Kadomatsu, Ichiro Saito, Nobuko Maeda, Yoichi Nakagawa |
| ||Gerodontology. 2012; : no |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
||Oral Candida carriage, quantification, and species characterization in oral submucous fibrosis patients and healthy individuals : Oral submucous fibrosis and Candida
| ||Mamata S. Kamat, Shrinivas S. Vanaki, Rudrayya S. Puranik, Surekha R. Puranik, Ramanpreet Kaur |
| ||Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry. 2011; : no |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|