|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 56-59
Mandibular canine index as a sex determinant: A study on the population of western Uttar Pradesh
Vandana M Reddy, Susmita Saxena, Puja Bansal
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, India
Vandana M Reddy
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Subharti Dental College, Meerut-250 002, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Objective: To establish the effectiveness of mandibular canine index in predicting sex in Western Uttar Pradesh population.
Materials and Methods: 200 subjects belonging to Western Uttar Pradesh population (100 males; 100 females) in the age group of 17-25 yrs were included. Impressions were made with alginate and study models prepared with dental stone. Maximum mesiodistal diameter of mandibular canines and the linear distance between tips of mandibular canines were measured using a Vernier caliper. Observed mandibular canine index (MCIo) was calculated as the ratio between the maximum mesiodistal width of mandibular canine and canine arc width.
Results: Left canine exhibited greater sexual dimorphism i.e. 9.05% as compared with right canine i.e. 8.782%. Sex could be predicted correctly in approximately 70% of subjects examined.
Conclusion: With the standard MCI it was possible to detect sex in the population of Western Uttar Pradesh to an extent of about 72%. Hence it is considered as a quick, easy and reproducible method for determining the sex of an individual.
Keywords: Canine, mesio-distal dimension, Northern India, sexual dimorphism
|How to cite this article:|
Reddy VM, Saxena S, Bansal P. Mandibular canine index as a sex determinant: A study on the population of western Uttar Pradesh. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2008;12:56-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Reddy VM, Saxena S, Bansal P. Mandibular canine index as a sex determinant: A study on the population of western Uttar Pradesh. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2016 May 30];12:56-9. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/text.asp?2008/12/2/56/44577
| Introduction|| |
Gender determination of skeletal remains is part of archaeological and many medico-legal examinations. The methods vary and depend on the available bones and their condition. The only method that can give a totally accurate result is the DNA technique, but in many cases for several reasons it cannot be used. Anthropological measurements of the skeleton and the comparison with existing standard data must then be applied and may help to differentiate between male and female remains. On an individual basis however, gender differences are not always distinctive, but taken collectively they can give a good indication in the majority of cases.
When jaws are at hand, teeth may be used for gender determination with the aid of odontometric analysis. Mandibular canines are found to exhibit the greatest sexual dimorphism amongst all teeth. , The mandibular canines are not only exposed to less plaque, calculus, abrasion from brushing, or heavy occlusal loading than other teeth, they are also less severely affected by periodontal disease and so, usually are the last teeth to be extracted with respect to age.  These findings indicate that mandibular canines can be considered as the 'key teeth' for personal identification.  Studies performed on the lower canines using the ratio between the maximum crown width and inter-canine width, resulting in a mandibular canine index (MCI), have shown an ability to determine gender with an accuracy of 84.3% in males and 87.5% in females and 83.3% in males and 81% in females by comparing the observed MCI with a standard MCI value , respectively. Mandibular canine index was employed in numerous studies on large populations as it is simple, reliable, inexpensive and easy to perform.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy with which gender can be differentiated by using the mandibular canine index on the Western Uttar Pradesh population, and to correlate with other studies.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study group consisted of 100 males and 100 females of Western Uttar Pradesh origin between the age group of 17-25 years. The inclusion criteria for the study are as follows:
- Healthy state of gingiva and periodontium
- Caries free canine teeth
- Normal overjet and overbite (2-3 mm)
- Absence of spacing in the anterior teeth
- Class I molar and canine relationship
Maxillary and mandibular impressions of all the samples were made with alginate and study models were prepared in dental stone. Mandibular study models were used for the analysis. On the study model the following measurements were taken for all the subjects using a digital Vernier's calipers.
Mandibular canine width was measured as the greated mesio-distal dimension of mandibular canine on either side of the jaw using a Vernier caliper [Figure 1]. The inter canine distance was measured as the linear distance between the cusp tips of right and left mandibular canine [Figure 2].
The observed mandibular canine width and intercanine width were subjected to statistical analysis to assess sex difference using unpaired t-test. Intraobserver error was assessed using paired student t-test on 50 randomly selected casts.
The observed mandibular canine index (MCI o ) was calculated using the formula below:
The standard MCI value is used as a cut-off point to differentiate males from females, which is obtained from the measurements taken from the samples by applying the following formula:
The observed MCI was then compared with the standard MCI value obtained in this study and correlated with previous studies like Rao et al. and Muller et al . ,
| Results|| |
The results have been depicted in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. From [Table 1] it is evident that the various parameters (inter-canine distance, mandibular canine width, MCI) measured for males and females when compared are statistically different. There is no statistically significant difference between the right and left mandibular canines amongst males or females so the maximum crown width was considered, but when comparing between males and females there is highly statistically significant difference. The intra-observer error was assessed at p<0.05 level and showed no statistically significant differences. The calculated standard MCI for both males and females were found to be 0.256. With these calculations, we could predict sex correctly at 72.5% in this study.
On comparing the MCI o values of this study to the standard MCI S values of Rao et al.(5), (0.274) and Muller et al.(7), (0.269) the percentage of sex prediction was low at average of 35 and 52% respectively [Table 3].
| Discussion|| |
Canines differ from other teeth with respect to survival and sex dichotomy. These differences are probably related to their function, which is different on an evolutionary basis from other teeth. In present day humans, it is not coincidence that the mandibular canines are the teeth that show the greatest sex difference in size and in prominence and eruption age. Although canine sex differences and enhanced canine survival probably are not related to each other, both are probably related to the need for successful use of canines as weapons for total body survival. Canine separation is influenced by the width of the incisors and canines, and significant correlations were found in both sexes between canine separation and canine widths. 
The present study establishes the existence of a definite statistically significant sexual dimorphism in mandibular canines. It is consistent with the findings of Hashim and Murshid  who conducted a study on Saudi males and females in the age group of 13-20 years and found that only the canines in both jaws exhibited a significant sexual difference while the other teeth did not.  Similar findings were given by Lew and Keng  in their study on an ethnic Chinese population with normal occlusions. 
In general, the difference in size between male and female teeth has been explained as part of the genetic expression of the male being larger than the female. The reason for the high level of dimorphic differences between male and female canines is uncertain, and consequently a large number of theories have been proposed. A popular theory has been to ascribe this to their function, which on evolutionary basis differs from other teeth. Eimerl and Devore postulated that in the evolution of primates there was a transfer of aggressive function from canines in apes to the fingers in man and that until this transfer was complete, survival was dependent on the canines, especially those of the males. The usefulness of the canines as an aid in gender determination by odontometric analyses, in forensic dentistry for example, is supported by their high level of survival in the dentition. The notable difference between canine in determining sex was noted to be due to the influence of the Y chromosome which was not uniform in all teeth. On the other hand the X-linked genetic influence on tooth width was rather uniform for all teeth.
Studies performed on the lower canines using the ratio between the maximum crown width and canine arc width, resulting in a mandibular canine index (MCI), have shown an ability to determine gender when performed on 384 females and 382 males of the South Indian population in the age-group of 15-21 years with an accuracy of 84.3% in males and 87.5% in females by comparing the observed MCI with a standard MCI value.  In a similar study by Muller et al .  the population involved the students enrolled in the University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis. Two hundred and ten girls and 214 boys were randomly sampled (1/20). The results were found to be statistically significant. In the present study both these parameters as measured in males and females were compared and the difference was found to be statistically significant. It is the Y chromosome which intervenes most in the size of teeth by controlling the thickness of dentine, whereas the X chromosome, for a long time considered to be the chromosome responsible, only comes into play concerning the thickness of enamel. 
The percentage dimorphism (the percent to which the tooth size of males exceeded that of females) expressed as the male/female ratio minus 1.00 was also calculated and according to the present study the left mandibular canine was found to exhibit greater dimorphism (9.058%). Garn and Lewis  and Lysell and Myrberg  concluded that the mandibular canine exhibited the greatest sexual dimorphism amongst all teeth (6.47% and 5.7% respectively). Nair et al. ,  in their study on South Indian subjects reported that the left mandibular canine exhibited a sexual dimorphism of 7.7% and the right mandibular canine 6.2%.
Any measurement of teeth unaccompanied by information about age, race and sex must be treated with great caution. In the present study, sex could be predicted to an extent of about 70%. But such a method of sex determination has its limitations due to variations of this parameter with geographic distribution. This implies that it is necessary to make up a random sample of the population from this geographical area to calculate the corresponding standard MCI.
| Conclusion|| |
MCI is a quick and reliable method for sexual identification when a standard for the population is available. Sex determination using the pelvis and skull bones show an accuracy of 95% and above.  As the accuracy of MCI in identification of sex have never exceeded 87.5%, it can only be used as a supplement tool.
| References|| |
|1.||Kaushal S, Patnaik VV, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canines in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2003;52:119-24. |
|2.||Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. J Dent Res 1967;46:963-72. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|3.||Anderson DL, Thompson GW. Interrelationships and sex differences of dental and skeletal measurements. J Dent Res 1973;52:431-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|4.||Dahlberg AA. Dental traits as identification tools. Dent Prog 1963;3:155-60. |
|5.||Rao NG, Rao NN, Pai ML, Kotian MS. Mandibular canine index: A clue for establishing sex identity. Forensic Sci Int 1989;42:249-54. [PUBMED] |
|6.||Yadav S, Nagabhushan D, Rao BB, Mamatha GP. Mandibular canine index in establishing sex identity. Indian J Dent Res 2002;13:143-6. [PUBMED] |
|7.||Muller M, Lupipegurier L, Quatrehomme G, Bolla M. Odontometrical method useful in determining gender and dental alignment. Forensic Sci Int 2001;121:194-7. |
|8.||Hashim HA, Murshid ZA. Mesiodistal tooth width: A comparison between Saudi males and females. Egypt Dent J 1993;39:343-6. [PUBMED] |
|9.||Lew KK, Keng SB. Anterior crown dimensions and relationship in an ethnic Chinese population with normal occlusions. Aust Orthod J 1991;12:105-9. [PUBMED] |
|10.||Nair P, Rao BB, Annigeri RG. A study of tooth size, symmetry and sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Med Toxicol 1999;16:10-3. |
|11.||Lysell L, Myrberg N. Mesiodistal tooth size in deciduous and permanent dentitions. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:113-22. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Canine Index – A Tool for Sex Determination
| ||Shankar M. Bakkannavar,S. Manjunath,Vinod C. Nayak,G. Pradeep Kumar |
| ||Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2014; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Validity of the mandibular canine index (MCI) in sex prediction: Reassessment in an Indian sample
| ||Ashith B. Acharya, Punnya V. Angadi, Sudeendra Prabhu, Shweta Nagnur |
| ||Forensic Science International. 2011; 204(1-3): 207.e1 |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|